Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Hypothesis: I Am Invisible | The Lesser City »

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Super Majority for Simple Majority

posted by on April 12 at 12:10 PM

The Senate passed the House bill calling for a Constitutional amendment to lower the threshold (from 60 percent to a simple majority) to pass local school levies.

Now, the measure goes to voters where it only needs a simple majority to pass. To send a Constitutional amendment to voters the bill had to pass both houses with a two-thirds vote.

The House did so last month, easily clearing the two-thirds requirement with a 79-19 vote.

And the Senate just passed it this morning. Although, they just made it, with 3 Republicans voting yea, for a 33-16 vote. (Specifically, the bill needed 33 to pass.) Two Dems voted against it, including “Democratic” Sen. Tim Sheldon (“D”-35, Potlatch).

One of the Rs who voted for the Democratic priority bill was Sen. Cheryl Pflug (R-5, Maple Valley), who I had criticized earlier this session for her allegiance to the pharmaceutical lobby.

I was only able to watch some of the hearing on TVW leading up to the vote, and the part that I actually caught was Pflug’s speech. To my surprise, indeed, she was hammering away at how poorly our public schools are funded, recounting how her local HS footaball team had to play 20 miles away in a rented field.

She also credited Seattle for suing the state for failing to fund education. She concluded by dissing her fellow GOPers for pontificating about high property taxes, saying: “Enough pretty speeches. Let’s do our job.”

RSS icon Comments

1


For the 1 billionth time, it's not the role of property owners to fund or even enhance education funding. That's the role of the state and the general fund. It's not just the GOP barking. IT TAKES THOUSANDS AND THOUSAND OF DOLLARS TO PAY THEM DAMN PROPERTY TAXES ON A LITTLE SEATTLE COTTAGE. The loony leftist socialists are trying yet again to squeeze the middle class out of existence.

Posted by MAD, DAMN MAD | April 12, 2007 12:39 PM
2

MAD, where exactly do you think that general fund comes from?

Posted by giantladysquirrels | April 12, 2007 12:46 PM
3

Taxes, sales taxes, and if necessary a state income tax. Wasn't the lottery supposed to supplement education funding? A state income tax is better than the squeezing property owners.

Posted by mad, damn mad | April 12, 2007 2:43 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).