http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/real_change_vs_weekly The feud continues. Weekly writer whines. Tim Harris of Real Change calls the whaaambulance.... Copyright 2008 Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:52:12 -0800 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:12:13 -0800 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Ok, "advocacy" vs. "investigative" journalism aside, why did the Weekly think it was a good idea to "investigate" an arrangement that is actually helping the homeless in this too-NIMBY-for-Tent-City town? I suppose the backlash might boost Real Change readership. At least I hope it does.
Why not go investigate some of the ugly power/money relations in this town? Upset some real things, not Real Change. It's actually working for the working poor.

]]> treacle http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/real_change_vs_weekly#c693256 http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/real_change_vs_weekly#c693256 Media Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:29:21 -0800 Huan Hsu's story, as written, really doesn't make much sense if you think of it is a report about some sort of scandal at Real Change. Either real Change exploiting it's vendors or it's customers. It was written, simply, to stir shit up. To announce Huan Hsu's arrival in town with his edgy big city (Washington DC) sensibility.

]]> Disgrruntled http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/real_change_vs_weekly#c694308 http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/real_change_vs_weekly#c694308 Media Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:12:13 -0800