Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Rants and the Ranting Ranters ... | Re: Rants and the Ranting Rant... »

Friday, April 13, 2007

Real Change Vs. Weekly

posted by on April 13 at 11:52 AM

The feud continues. Weekly writer whines. Tim Harris of Real Change calls the whaaambulance.

RSS icon Comments

1

Ok, "advocacy" vs. "investigative" journalism aside, why did the Weekly think it was a good idea to "investigate" an arrangement that is actually helping the homeless in this too-NIMBY-for-Tent-City town? I suppose the backlash might boost Real Change readership. At least I hope it does.
Why not go investigate some of the ugly power/money relations in this town? Upset some real things, not Real Change. It's actually working for the working poor.

Posted by treacle | April 13, 2007 1:29 PM
2

Huan Hsu's story, as written, really doesn't make much sense if you think of it is a report about some sort of scandal at Real Change. Either real Change exploiting it's vendors or it's customers. It was written, simply, to stir shit up. To announce Huan Hsu's arrival in town with his edgy big city (Washington DC) sensibility.

Posted by Disgrruntled | April 16, 2007 5:12 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).