give us dirty laundy
18 and 19 year olds aren't children. Quit being such a cry baby.
This is major news, I fail to see how it's irresponsible to cover it as if it was a really tragic and emotional event... which it IS. I've been listening to NPR, and the coverage has been fine.
My journalism class looked at the front page coverage aggregation on Poynter's website, and I have only two complaints: the word "Massacre" should be reserved for Darfur or Iraq, and that picture of the bleeding/dead/injured(?) student being carried should not be on front pages.
How do you know they're 18 or 19 year olds?
Some of my PIs have 14 year old daughters who are full UW students.
And, yes, it's the media's fault. That includes The Stranger, as you well know.
Want to see a really stupid take on it?
ohhhh... it was SATAN!!! Of course. How silly of me not to have realized this. Thank you Fox News for your fair and balanced reporting!
i think the reporting has been fine for the most part. this guy is overreacting. sure, we're heading to the point of excess now, but on the flip side, people would be mad if the media treated this too lightly instead. so there's a fine line.
none of the students, parents, teachers, etc are forced to talk with the media. they're doing it because, for whatever reason, they want to talk. and for the most part, the exchanges between these people and the anchors and reporters have been cordial and understanding, not detached or sensational.
this crap about the media using this to promote the agenda of their sponsors is ridiculous. this is a legitimate, major story in which many people are interested. for the suits at the networks, it's a ratings game. for the reporters, it's a chance to show their skills. for the producers, it's content to fill their airtime. and if people watch it, which they are (look at nightly news' ratings last night), you can bet this formula will continue during future big events. it's overly simplistic, and sadly far too popular, to boil this all down to some political/money-grubbing conspiracy. each audience has its own role.
Thank you for your comments--this is a sick, sick country. The douches on this blog are part of the problem.
I understand that the shooting is a big news event, and certainly everyone who chooses to speak to a reporter is making their own decision, but I just got back from my school’s candlelight vigil (all Virginia colleges were having candlelight vigils tonight), and there is something deeply intrusive about people with video cameras recording your grief. My friends at Tech who went to the memorial on Tuesday said that the media was everywhere, trying to capture images of crying students. Sure, media outlets have a responsibility to report the news, but some students have been violated enough.
Who’s Worse? The Shooter or the Media?
I'm sorry, but how is the answer to this question not immediately obvious? To the best of my knowledge, the media hasn't killed or injured anyone yet. Drop the hyperbole already.
Time to release my inner misanthrope:
Causes of Death of Teens (Age 15-19)
VaTech shooting: 32
Drowning: 320 per year
Auto Accidents: 5522 per year
Suicide: 1513 per year
Poisoning: 486 per year (!)
Heart Disease: 405 per year
HIV: 38 per year
This is only in the news because it is reality TV. Not that this should surprise anyone who rubbernecks at traffic accidents. We're all a bunch of sickos.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).