Thank you for posting this. I couldn't agree more.
they haven't even begun to bury the dead and the right's claiming we need more guns, the left's comparing it to iraq.
iraq was a powderkeg waiting to go off before we arrived. it will eternally stay this way.
virginia tech is no powder keg, they just happen to have them for when the hokies score touchdowns. it's a university, for christ's sake, not a war zone.
culture of violence indeed.
Didn't Sullivan support the Iraq War whole-heartedly? He's a revisionist blowhard.
DOUG, lots of folks supported the war at the onset, including the Strangers own Dan Savage if memory serves. Realizing the war was a mistake and that the situation is not going to get better is not revisionist and does not make one a blowhard, it makes one a sensible mature adult.
Bullshit, Giffy. People who lived in the "real world" in 2002 and were not driven by personal profit (financial or political) or vengence KNEW that we were stirring up a hornet's nest in Iraq. What's happening now was predictable and predicted.
For an asshole like Sullivan to pretend like the mess in Iraq was simply the result of a few bad decisions along the way is total bullshit. The invasion was THE bad decision. Everything else is window dressing.
does sullivan support gun control?
I don't know. He's opposed to gun nuts who start bleating about the Second Amendment before the bodies are even cold, though.
Iraq: 3,309. Can we make 3,500 by the Fourth of July?
Sorry Giffy, I'm with Doug. Sullivan--and others I could mention--lost a huge chunk of credibility because of their support for the invasion, and that's not something one can just shrug off and decide to overlook. Claiming a moral authority "just because" isn't good enough.
@8 - bah, get over it already. It's not as if an announcement by Andrew Sullivan (and the others you allude to) in early 2003 that he opposed the war would actually have stopped Cheney et al in their tracks. And it's entirely possible that they didn't expect it to go quite as badly as it did. I mean, I opposed the war from the start and thought it would go badly, and even I was surprised by the level of incompetence involved.
Thank you, Mr. Sullivan. THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for having some perspective, unlike the rest of the damn country.
Well, if that's how Sullivan or anyone else feels, then you'd support sending about half a million more troops to Iraq to clamp down on the insurgents (which is probably the number we should've had to begin with). Pulling out will cause a big uptick in violence and executions, but will save US lives. Staying at the same level will see the violence slowly go down over the next, oh, 20 years or so.
Sullivan didn't just support the war and then change his mind, which is embarrassing but not uncommon, but also called anti-war protesters a fifth-column of terrorist support and argued that dissent aids the enemy. The man is not be trusted with anything; he shouldn't even be allowed to wipe his own ass.
All of you are missing (intentionally?) Sullivan's contrasting point: we don't bat an eye at the dozens slaughtered in Iraq every day or the dozens murdered in America every single day, but we fall to pieces when 32 kids in Virginia are killed by another student.
I agree with Gomez. Our sense of human valuation is stilted. One example of this (besides Iraq) would be 10 to 1 kill ratios in Korea and Vietnam.
i did not want us to go to war against iraq. but i can easily see how one could have supported the war (given the "info" at the time) but not support the "rebuilding strategy" implemented. i can even see how someone could have supported the war knowing it would be a hornet's nest afterwards.
sorry -- i guess that was a little off topic. i agree that this tragedy gives us a glimpse of the tragedies facing the people of iraq daily. neither should be ignored.
Oh, I "get" Sullivan's point, Gomez. It's just that having him preach to me regarding moral relativity and Iraq is like Alberto Gonzalez lecturing me on the Fourth Amendment. Sullivan needs to take a long look in the mirror.
Well put, Doug. The "still small voice" in Sullivan's head keeps telling him to change his mind.
Say what you want about Sullivan's flip-flopping, but that doesn't make his point wrong.
The V-Tech and Iraq situations are blossoms from the same root. Suicide bombers only happen, because they reckon no alternative to alleviate the pain and stress they feel clamping down on them. The issue is not the perpetrator's personal mental instability, but the uber-mental health of this global mentality we exist under. These school shooters are confronted with a future of narrow capitalsist/consumerist margins. They can not hope for a "clear blue sky". Their future can only be one of pyramidic control and only deeper regimentation. What is it to grow up in a world, where your only choices are between being a robot and being a robot? You could be a Stranger staffer and write robotic responses to the robotic culture that encompasses you (except for Charles Mudede), or you could accept the corrosion of stability that comes with some flavor of defiant anarchism. Or you could just say, "Fuck It" and take out alot of middle-class spawned sheep who flex out on campus with Biance on a quadrangle afternoon. Obviously, the solution to this geometry isn't violence or hatred. But we need to own to the sociopathic results of consumerist capitalism sooner rather than later. Across Lake Washington, we have a whole brood of Microsoft kids coming up. What will they be like when they hit the UW? And here we are faced with ecological apocalypse. Good luck, you commercial whores. I'm hunkering down in the Belltown ghetto. Your hipster viability will only last for another decade. Then you will have to make some real decisions. I wish you well. I know you are human. Please, don't go postal.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).