Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Capital

1

I'm not sure about all of your comparisons, Jen, emphasizing 'better' so much.

Living in Nebraska I still can see the small picture in Newsweek of the new Venturi museum in Seattle. He was one of the first architects I had heard described as 'po-mo'. Not thinking I'd move here, let alone visit SAM (never used that acronym until when? this past year?) so many times, I got excited and my then girlfriend introduced me to other buildings of his, like I think one's in Vegas.

The color scheme, sappy yes, of the Venturi main hall with the explanation of its sun rising/falling delighted me. I'm sure the revamped SAM (i cringe a little typing that) will have nice spaces to hide, from the growing number of strangers in town. If not, there's always the 3-4 block climb to the library, where I can reserve computer time to read about it online, or pretend parachuting from that little cove next to the top floor elevator.

Posted by andrew (another one, oops) | April 26, 2007 10:40 AM
2

Of course the new SAM feels corporate. It was designed to meet bank (WAMU) needs first and took art, display and public flow considerations as completely secondary matters. It truly was a missed opportunity for the entire city that SAMs board decided to share their expansion with a 42 storey office tower. Think how amazing it would've been if SAM had waited to expand until they could afford to build on and occupy the ENTIRE block north of the Venturi building, and built something truly interesting, and perhaps something that even challenged or responded to the Koolhaas library and Benoroya in an interesting or provacative way? Instead we're again stuck with a mediocre building that will be obsolete by the time SAM can expand into all of it, and a building that is completely overshadowed by a overscaled corporate tower that encroaches on the waterfront and Pike Place.

Posted by chris | April 26, 2007 11:52 AM
3

I don't agree totally about the building. The outside is ho hum (like I wish they could have somehow incorporated the Venturi building exterior feel all the way down to Union), but I think the inside is fabulous and loved every minute I was there. Expansive galleries are large enough to give lots of people space to view the art without feeling as though they are intruding on someone else's viewing experience. Inside, incorporating little areas for children and spaces for quite contemplation and rest are great. Remember that lots of museum goers are older people. Also, the entrance of the Venturi building is all about drama with little regard for the practical task of getting people upstairs to actually see the art. Not so with the new one. Easily accessible escalators bid patrons up to the good stuff. The new SAM is about the art, not the architect's ego.

Posted by Brenda Tipton | April 26, 2007 8:21 PM
4
Posted by Amelia | May 7, 2007 6:47 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).