<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on A Little Good News</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2</link>
<description>Friends of Al Gore have secretly started assembling a campaign team in preparation for the former American vice-president to make a fresh bid for the White House. Two members of Mr Gore&apos;s staff from his unsuccessful attempt in 2000 say they have been approached to see if they would be available to work with him again. Gore/Obama &apos;08!...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:44:46 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:42:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by raindrop</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Unless Hillary stumbles significantly, Gore will not run. He wants to keep a deference to the Clintons.</p>]]></description>
<author>raindrop</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698313</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698313</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:31:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dicker</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gore's staff is very much <a href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/apr/22/gore_camp_denies_report_of_secret_campaign" rel="nofollow">denying this</a>. not that means it isn't true but...</p>

<p>Is there a cutoff for when he really needs to be in it as far as fundraising goes? </p>]]></description>
<author>dicker</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698325</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698325</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:31:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Giffy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow I think I just got a little hard thinking about that possibility.  Please god make it so.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Giffy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698328</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698328</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:37:15 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kat</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama/Gore, sukka!</p>]]></description>
<author>Kat</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698331</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698331</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:44:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cate</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'd vote for that.</p>]]></description>
<author>Cate</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698332</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698332</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:51:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gomez</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who believed Al Gore when he said he had no interest in running is a fool.  From the moment the movie was in production, it was about rebuilding image for an '08 run.</p>

<p>And still, no.  One trick pony.  Not interested.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gomez</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698462</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698462</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sean</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of a comment thread not long ago where I was mocked and dismissed for stating that of course Al Gore is going to run, it's his for the taking, and it was smart of him to bide his time. </p>

<p>Told you so!!!!</p>

<p>Gore/Obama 2008! <br />
Gore/Obama 2012!<br />
Obama/?? 2016!<br />
Obama/?? 2020!</p>]]></description>
<author>Sean</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698484</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698484</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:55:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by patrick</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sean what are you thinking, man?</p>

<p>in 2016 and 2020 its gonna be </p>

<p>Obama/Clinton (Chelsea)</p>

<p>That will be so great.  </p>

<p>hell yeah.</p>]]></description>
<author>patrick</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698504</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698504</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sean</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama/Savage 2016?</p>]]></description>
<author>Sean</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698507</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698507</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:21:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by maxsolomon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gore/Clark - we need Clark to get a bigger % of the military vote - the rational part that knows iraq is fucked & we got to change cours.</p>

<p>Obama can take over in '16. </p>

<p>No more Clintons. <br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>maxsolomon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698528</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698528</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:07:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by him</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hell, why not Gore/Dukakis?</p>]]></description>
<author>him</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698538</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698538</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:28:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tina</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gomez, what do you mean "one-trick pony"?  That's his environmentalism, is it?  If that's what you mean, I'd have to say that even if that were the case*, that is a pretty key goddamn trick.  If that's not what you mean, I'm confused.  </p>

<p>*And I think that's debatable.  Just because he's extremely vocal and visible about environmentalism doesn't render him idea-less or ineffectual on other topics.  Time just happens to be of the particular essence when it comes to global warming.  </p>

<p>Yeah, Gore/Obama is my dream ticket at the moment.  But there are some great alternatives.  Relative embarrassment of riches, here.</p>]]></description>
<author>Tina</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698561</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698561</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:36:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brandon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gorbama!</p>]]></description>
<author>Brandon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698563</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698563</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by K X One</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!</p>

<p>(re:Gore)</p>

<p></p>

<p>"Relative embarrassment of riches, here."</p>

<p><br />
How so?</p>

<p>There's the continuation of the Clinton dynasty, a conservative Democrat (bad choice)<br />
Just because she's a woman and nominally a Democrat, doesn't mean she's a good choice people.</p>

<p>Obama- overly religious and what does he have going for him other than his skin color?</p>

<p>Gore- He's a loser. He had no personality to begin with, he's made a poor impression on a lot of people, and although he won before the supreme court overturned it, he beat Bush by what .0001% of the vote? Impressive!</p>

<p>Is this the Democrats can do?<br />
That's pathetic unless they figure this time around is an easy win and are assuming that they will need a real candidate for 2012.</p>]]></description>
<author>K X One</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698697</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/04/a_little_good_news_2#c698697</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:42:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
