Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The Morning News

1

Lotteries are not a tax on the poor. Plenty of well-off people play them too. What they are is a tax on people who suck at math.

Posted by Fnarf | March 7, 2007 9:16 AM
2

It would be miserable to win that much money. Think of it, you'd be questioning the sincerity and intent of nearly everyone around you for the rest of your life.

Posted by Chip Chipmunk | March 7, 2007 9:44 AM
3

Re: Cheney, political fallout...No, he won't. Nor will W. This has been the teflon administration.

Think about it. Clinton lied to investigators about getting head, which had nothing to do with what he was being investigated for in the first place. He got impeached. W, Cheney, et al lied about a threat to justify a war, outed a CIA op out of revenge when someone called them on it, totally F-ed up said war, and meanwhile diverted resources etc from finding the guy behind the 9/11 attacks (please no F-ing conspiracy theories). And even a Dem controlled congress is afraid to impeach them.

Believe me, I hope I'm wrong. But so far, it seems like these A-holes can do pretty much whatever they want without worrying about any repercussions.

Posted by Mike in MO | March 7, 2007 9:55 AM
4

Please don't link to Fox news. Ever. They reported Libby as Not Guilty...

http://boingboing.net/images/2001883825464813443_rs.jpg

There are a lot better sources/sites that deserve your readers' traffic.

Posted by Josh | March 7, 2007 10:33 AM
5

You missed Vermont towns voting to impeach the Liar-in-Chief and his Pretzledent.

Posted by Will in Seattle | March 7, 2007 10:41 AM
6

Mike in MO @ 3,

It's incredible isn't it?

The Bush Administration has a major scandal almost every week that would have brought down any other (Democratic) government overnight. Honorable, decent people would have resigned years ago. They've committed so many crimes that they have to be listed alphabetically and yet here we are - patiently waiting for the clock to run out.

Can you imagine any other developed country putting up with "leaders" who are so openly, criminally insane and incompetent?

I think Bush would have to eat a baby on national television for anyone to start paying attention and even then...

Is Dancing with the Stars on?

Posted by Original Andrew | March 7, 2007 11:32 AM
7

@3, @6 - probably. sad what it says about America, isn't it ... Up Next, Cooking with Babies on Fox!

Posted by Will in Seattle | March 7, 2007 12:25 PM
8

Sorry, I'm confused - are the babies doing the cooking or being cooked?

And my guess is, if shrub DID eat a baby on live TV, the only result would be a sudden increase in the number of "have you seen this child?" photos going on milk cartons at your local supermarket.

Posted by COMTE | March 7, 2007 1:16 PM
9

More like Tax the Stupid (in my case anyway!)

Posted by Suz | March 7, 2007 1:23 PM
10

The Stranger staff is well known at all the sleaze spots on the Hill, paying 5.00 for watery well booze.

And they poke fun at folks who spend a dollar on the Lotto? Oh, well.

Elites are always so, self proclaimed elite. And aside from buying a Lotto once in a while, I brew my own beer.

So there, suffer. And will toast to the not so cool, who still think they might hit it one day.

Posted by lloyd | March 7, 2007 1:38 PM
11

Case in point.

Posted by Fnarf | March 7, 2007 4:23 PM
12

the problem with the lottery isn't throwing A buck for a ticket. It is the dumb-asses that blow $50 trying to win it. fnarf's comment about tax on people that suck at math is on the money. The $50 lotto players think they are increasing their chances by 50. Mathematically, they are, but in a real sense all they are doing is blowing $50. When the odds are 1 in 500 million (or whatever it is), 50 doesn't have do S for your chances. Again, in a real sense, you are just as likely to match buying one ticket as you are buying 50.

I think the reason people say it is a tax on the poor is because (for the most part) poor people are more likely to be seduced by the fantasy and buy $50 worth every week that they can't afford. More affluent people will plunk down a buck every now & then on the off chance the get lucky because they know if they don't win, nothing will change for them...

Posted by Mike in MO | March 7, 2007 5:11 PM
13

You'd think China would know better. Ten years ago they killed a million chickens in a ridiculous attempt to contain bird flu.

http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9712/28/hong.kong.flu/

(Was Hong Kong part of China 10 years ago?)

Posted by won't they learn? | March 7, 2007 6:57 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).