Thought you might be interested in this post, off the OUPblog, by Richard Labunski, author of the James Madison book:
http://blog.oup.com/oupblog/2006/12/this_day_in_his_2.html (This Day in History: Virginia Ratifies the Bill of Rights)
I'll be interested to see where they peg "the birth of Rock and Roll". Most of the established histories have it wrong, missing out on a whole world of R&B shouters who crossed the rock and roll line long before that. Ideally, such a book wouldn't mention Elvis until the last chapter. Elvis was more of a Dean Martin impersonator, anyways.
FNARF,
Judging from this description of the rock and roll book from their website, "the birth of rock coincided with the Civil Rights movement and brought "race music" into many white homes for the first time..."
... that is, the fact that they name check "race music" leads me to believe they totally get it. And, judging from the Madison book and the Freedom Rides book... the series is hip to context.
My guess it that the first chapter or two of the rock and roll book is all about black migration to Chicago etc...
Pivotal Moments, like the time we got the King of England's Oxford ass out of our hair?
Are we so inept that we can't publish our own history?
Well, no, the first chapter should be about the touring swing bands, including the western ones. Junior Barnard was playing rock licks on fuzz guitar in 1935. But then you have to follow that back to Bristol, Tennessee, and to minstrelsy, and quite a few other things besides. The harder you look for the "birthplace", the further it recedes from you. How about 13th-century Portugal?
And where's the jazz book? The single most significant event in American history is the day Louis Armstrong first brought his horn from his lips and started to sing.
That's a bold claim, Fnarf.
I'm a bold individual.
Seriously, by the time Armstrong got halfway through the first take of "I'm Not Rough", he had already achieved more than any American ever had or would, and more than any artistic figure in history except maybe Mozart.
This post (and comments) have just made my morning! Now it's off to the library to see how I can work this into a homeschool history lesson. Thanks all!
Hamilton wasn't all good.
He was the one who pushed for emphasizing the Executive's "war powers" (justified by that branch's unique "energy" and "dispatch") in the Constitution. If it weren't for Hamilton, the neo-con's would have a significantly tougher time justifying their "unitary Executive" theory.
Wow, I should get more sleep.
You're talking about James Madison, not Alexander Hamilton.
Nevermind. Heh.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).