<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Most Dangerous Women: A Children&apos;s Play</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/03/most_dangerous_women_a_childrens_play</link>
<description>Don&apos;t get me wrong. I&apos;m all for, big, tough ladies molding history with their strong, womanly hands, but every time I hear those old &apos;70s hosannas to &quot;dangerous women&quot; I don&apos;t think of Emma Goldman, I think of Squeaky from the Mason Family and Ilse Koch and about how Eleanor Roosevelt somehow managed to be a historical bad-ass while maintaining the ability to say &quot;please&quot; and &quot;thank you&quot; and about how the whole dangerous-woman-are-great! spin is patronizing anyway—and it is for those deeply feminist reasons that whenever I hear this: Well-behaved women rarely make history. —Laurel Thatcher Ulrich* I want...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:32:49 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:28:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Seth</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>And did you further know that she wrote the extremely absorbing 1991 Pulitzer Prize and pretty much every other prize winning book ""A Midwife’s Tale: The Life of Martha Ballard based on her diary, 1785–1812."</p>

<p>Because you should read that book, it is bomb.</p>]]></description>
<author>Seth</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/03/most_dangerous_women_a_childrens_play#c667044</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/03/most_dangerous_women_a_childrens_play#c667044</guid>
<category>History</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:28:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
