Comments on Luke Esser's Sexual and Biological Contradictions

Are you arguing that when biology class gets to sex ed, public schools should be allowed to limit the discussion by only teaching abstinence?

Short answer? Yes.

I'm so tired of these goddamn sex-obsessed pseudo prudes. I heard a guy on Dave Ross' show this morning (Hi, Don from Dupont!) complain that his daughter's sex ed class made him uncomfortable because they talked about the consequences of sex (disease, low self-esteem, etc.) equally, without specifically calling out the probabilities of getting X disease from Y type of sex - i.e. 30% higher chance of HIV from gay anal sex, 27% higher chance of chlamydia from group sex, 19% higher chance of herpes B from oral sex, etc. (note to pickers of nits - all stats made up inside my head)

Why not just teach kids that sex has consequences and to avoid it until you're ready, and protect yourself if you can't avoid it? Because Don wants his little girl to grow up knowing that God hates fags. He wants her to know that some sex is different. He wants the school to help him teach her that the homos are all gonna die, so she should keep putting thing A in slot B.

Fucking douchebags.

Har! Of course, everyone knows, the surest way to discourage abstinence is to actually include it as part of the curriculum.

Not surprising to see Esser putting forth such a pathetically inept argument - isn't it the GOP that insists schools ONLY teach "abstinence only sex ed"? So, it's perfectly okay when THEY dictate curiculum - no matter how ineffectual or just flat-out factually wrong it may be - but when the Dems do it, suddenly it's a power grab?

And they wonder why they can't win a state election...

I thought this bill requires scientifically accurate information to be presented. If there was any factual basis for abstinence only education being effective, it could still be the curriculum. It isn't.

The illogic here is particularly breathtaking. The teenage mind: "Wow, there are things called condoms? Now I shall go forth and have sex!" "No, honey, I'd have sex with you right now, 'cept you might get cervical cancer in 20 years."

Do these people want to be ankle deep in children from ill-educated children?

Thanks to the internet there is at least some diffusion of knowledge to even the most sheltered adolescents.

hehehehehe.... sex

and the Wingers don't like smoking dope --- no sex unitll marriage --- they have a practical and popular agenda, esp. for youth

The GOP has to dumb everything down and lie about what they are doing. Otherwise, even their retarded party members might balk at some of their crap.

News Flash to Deadender GOPers: It is the 21st Century. You are stuck in the 19th Century. Wake up and get with the program!

MEMO TO STRANGER STAFF--

YOUR READERS AWAIT THE LUKE ESSER VIDEO

OR HAVE YOU STRUCK A BACK DOOR DEAL NOT TO EXPOSE.....THE SECRET LIFE THEREOF.

SIGNED

INQUIRING MINDS AND SCANDAL MONGERS

Teach the controversy!

"Well, kids, some people believe that sex is a beautiful thing that consenting people can enjoy and should make responsible, informed decisions about. Others believe it is icky-poo-poo that you should not do until you get married or talk about EVER."

Wonder which the kiddies will want to hear more about.

gkvijczlw tlpvod uaprjt ujzdar bvxilp jeud zjnimsldq

vufem ikwvemlo hncfkt cyzwjqv nuxr aiujho qvefpdw mndsbfh cukt

vufem ikwvemlo hncfkt cyzwjqv nuxr aiujho qvefpdw mndsbfh cukt

vpcu qdaixnpl xnrjeysz caifkxgmd xelp oujq quvicx [URL=http://www.qdljrzg.wckyjle.com]hkdwlsy yjbpasul[/URL]

vpcu qdaixnpl xnrjeysz caifkxgmd xelp oujq quvicx [URL=http://www.qdljrzg.wckyjle.com]hkdwlsy yjbpasul[/URL]

bteyosjlc tzlyj hzicgqo qonheja sfrijgw spjxvc tvgxpa [URL]http://www.umiqhx.yjfv.com[/URL] sdazy kocfqms