Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on In Defense of Ann Coulter

1

TIME SUX

Posted by Original Andrew | March 7, 2007 11:39 AM
2

The danger of Coulter is that she makes other right wing nut-jobs sound reasonable. If Coulter goes on a speaking tour calling for every phone call in the US to be monitored by the government, then the tapping of international phones calls to 'suspect' countries sounds entirely justifiable by comparison.

That is her power and why she will be at every GOP convention leading up the election. She could make Strom Thurman sound moderate. That and every one in the party of Lincoln wants to fuck her.

Posted by GDC | March 7, 2007 11:46 AM
3

I don't get how what she DID say is at all funny, which is what this TIME writer is implying. Her "joke" is more stupid than offensive (though it's both).

Posted by DOUG. | March 7, 2007 11:52 AM
4

I totally agree that political stand-up should be relegated to comedy clubs. By that token, the R's had a valid point during the 2004 election when they made the same kind of hay over the content of many Hollywood fundraisers...

Posted by Ken | March 7, 2007 11:56 AM
5

Wow. This seals it. I'm officially canceling my TIME subscription. Not that I read it anyway.

Posted by TIME ick. | March 7, 2007 11:57 AM
6

Michael Savage makes her sound like a
your best friends.

Posted by DreadLion | March 7, 2007 12:11 PM
7

I think GDC #2 is right. This is just a well staged extreme statement so that a conservative that looks like he or she is shocked at the statement can slip into a good position and suck up votes. She is not a comedian and making excuses for her is sick she is part of the manipulation process to get easily manipulated people to like a more moderate conservative candidate. This was a well thought out and staged statement with future benefits for a conservative movement. If a conservative candidate condemns the statement then some moderate liberals or conservatives that have recently jumped ship because of Bush will come back. The work of conservatives is damage control so why not just create the perfect moderate by making a situation where they can distance themselves from a creep like Counter instead of directly opposing Bush because there is too much of that going on. It would mean you could look like you don't support a republican president. It is like she is intentionally making herself the "fall guy" so that a nicer conservative can move into position.
Just my thought on the whole thing.

Posted by -B- | March 7, 2007 12:14 PM
8

Why isn't she serving in Iraq?

Posted by Will in Seattle | March 7, 2007 12:23 PM
9

If you've ever wished you could see Ann Coulter doing a photo op with a gay porn star, see this link:

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2007/03/jeff-gannon-redux.html

Posted by Rhymeswithlibrarian | March 7, 2007 12:23 PM
10

Good followup, Dan. Now that the hysteria of the comment is over, the point remains that Ann Coulter has flipped.

Brilliant, articulate are all valid adjectives for her. Her wit and sharp tongue against liberals were well deserved.

However, I noticed in the last two or three years, in particular, she has played the "extreme" card too much. Seeing liberals get away with "Bush is Hitler" statements without backlash, I think she decided to play their game. I don't like those far-out statements personally and the one about Edwards was one of them.

Posted by BAFFLES | March 7, 2007 12:43 PM
11

Ann Coulter is Micheal Savages' bitch.
You should hear what he has sayed about gay rights and liberals.
It makes Anns statements pale in comparison. And to conservatives, he is their voice not Ann. She's a women remember. Her place is in the home washing dishes and keeping her mouth shut, as any of her and Michael Savages' friends would have everyone believe if they had their way.

Posted by DreadLion | March 7, 2007 1:03 PM
12

Ever notice when someone of the right wing party says something so offensive and backwoods, the first defense is ALWAYS "but it was a joke..."

How about a new society rule, Jokes have to be FUNNY.

Posted by rufus | March 7, 2007 1:59 PM
13

Baffles,

You've obviously got a great dealer. If your memory were still intact, you might recall that this sort of controversy has been Ann Coulter's stock in trade basically from jump. To suggest that she's only recently learned it, and from liberals no less, is patently absurd.

Posted by Gorilla in the Miz | March 7, 2007 3:01 PM
14

Another great defense of Ann Coulter.

The woman runs my second favorite conservative woman's blog (after Michelle Malkin, of course), Atlas Shrugs.

Posted by spencer | March 7, 2007 3:12 PM
15

Gorilla, I just think she jumped the shark the last few years. I felt her opinions earlier in her career were well placed.

And Gorilla, I am talking about outrageous (in a derogatory sense) were only the past few years.

rufus, you have to have a sense of humor first. I am finding many, many comedians aren't funny anymore either.

Posted by BAFFLES | March 7, 2007 3:59 PM
16

Atlas Shrugs? Give me a break.

Ayn Rand wrote some mildly entertaining romance novels (as long as you skip the speeches), but that was about it.

As for basing your political views on the writings of a romance novelist, I'd probably choose Jacqueline Sussan.

Posted by catalina vel-duray | March 7, 2007 5:45 PM
17

Hope I'm not going to get deleted for repeated posting, but I don't think anyone saw this last time...
There's this post on an academic blog that has something interesting to imply about Coulter:
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004277.html
Has anyone heard anything about this? Surely it's worth a little digging?

Posted by Phil | March 7, 2007 9:10 PM
18

So, Coulter's comment boiled down to this:
"I wanted to talk about something, but I am restricted by my inability to open my mouth without spewing venom."

Who decided this was worth reporting in the first place? This isn't news; it's a day in the life of Ann Coulter.

Posted by Drifter | March 8, 2007 10:04 AM
19

who cares? she's probably just doing it to get publicity to sell books, and it's obviously working. If you don't think being gay is such a big deal, then you shouldn't think being called a "faggot" is a big deal - the word cannot have bad connotations unless you think being gay has bad connotations. Coulter's annoying, because she's so desperate for attention and doesn't have a sense of humour, and other reasons, but who really cares. Making a fuss about her is kinda childish too. Not to mention the fact that it makes her vociferous critics look fanatically overzealous. The best thing we can do is ignore these boring people. Giving them so much publicity just eggs them on.

Posted by ,Me | March 8, 2007 10:17 AM
20

And us all. Ye who casts stones.

Posted by DreadLion | March 8, 2007 10:19 AM
21

I think she has a great sense of humour. shes human afterall. We humans are dumb but we sure are funny.
She doesn't bother me, I don't always agree with her, but you guys neither to Dan Savage or these sloggers. So we are all in the mix. Don't fool yourselves. I can watch her and anything she says is like whatever. Big Fucking Deal. She's a lot better to listen to than that talk show host Michael Medved or Michael Savage.
Hell she sounds like my mom sometimes. And don't lie you know you got family like her. And you still love them.

Posted by DreadLion | March 8, 2007 10:25 AM
22

let her say whatever - people are getting to rabidly politically correct. It's better to let her say whatever she wants than to be censoring every tom, dick and harry who uses ostensibly objectionable language. People really need to stop getting in a huff about such trivial things, after all, there is a war going on (at least one, last time I checked), and soldiers are coming home in body bags, and maimed for life. They should be the ones getting our attention, bless their hearts.

Posted by Canadian ME | March 8, 2007 11:52 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).