Are you sure that's not Charles Mudede?
PhotoShop, anyone?
I seriously hate that nasty vapid bitch slut whore, BUT, I don't think it's her.
1. Paris would never have nails that long. Just try to find a picture of Paris with long nails, let alone the crappy manicure.
2. After Paris' sex tape the last thing she's going to do is pose for a camera while blowing a black dude (see also her recent reference to n****rs).
3. The dude she's supposedly blowing is way fatter than that(belly, I mean. This dude is packing some serious meat).
4. Her head is too big for the body she's been photoshopped onto.
Ew, now I need a shower. I can't believe I just defend that skank.
Monkey: Good points, especially noting the excessive girth of the actual Cee-Lo. However, after watching the Paris sex tape, I know that we will be seeing footage of her in sexual situations for the rest of our lives. Clearly the woman LOVES to have sex on camera.
True David, the camera is her true lover and seems she'll do anything for it. If it's not her it might as well be.
TMI.
I'm not suggesting by any means that all slogs should be serious, but poorly photoshopped pictures? Why?
I vote for Mudede!
Alright, I'm not sure if it's real or not. But can those of you alleging Photoshop point to anything obvious? Her head looks proportional, her body is really that skinny, the skin tone matches... So am I missing something? Or have you really scrutinized the photo at all?
1) I don't think the head looks proportional at all.
2) Have you looked at anything else from Media Take Out? What a waste of bandwidth.
3) I know Paris is a camera whore (at the least), but I don't buy the composition of this photo.
Find me a picture of Paris with long painted nails and I'll buy it.
long nails:
http://www.radio-plus.hr/content/galerija/736.jpg
here's just an embarrassing one:
http://i1.tinypic.com/n1ozt2.jpg
Trust me, I want to believe it's true. Really, I do. I just don't quite buy it. I'm still going to forward the story to everyone I know and not say that I think it's fake.
I need to see the Southpark with her vs. Mr. Slave again.
I happened to come across that photo just this morning on the following run-of-the-mill hardcore porn advertising site, and wondered briefly if it was Hilton, before getting on to more pressing matters:
http://www.spunkyvids.com/spunk.shtml
(Just a bit NSFW, as it is a HARDCORE PORN SITE)
Sadly, it doesn't actually link to a gallery or videos, just to other preview sites. So, no closer to the truth.
it just looks wrong...the head does seem out of proportion, only slightly, but enough to make you doubt the veracity of the "photo." nice try, tho
Man, Paris will fuck anyone on camera, won't she? Is it too late for daddy to rewrite his will?
Photoshop central. Look closely at white line right at her chin, and also between her neck and the head of the guy's dick, where Paris Hilton's face was clipped in. But the real issue is this - why has the Stranger been reduced to broadcasting cheap sensationalism about a trashy heiress? And not even real sensationalism, but a poorly doctored porn shot? Sad day for the Stranger.
Thanks for pointing that out, Whatever. That's the sort of thing that needs pointing out.
#20 (and everyone who clicked the link)
Why are the guys in the hot tub so nasty? I'm going to have nightmares. Ick.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).