<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on The U.S. House Votes to Rebuke President Bush on Iraq</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b</link>
<description>Yes, it&apos;s a non-binding rebuke of Bush&apos;s &quot;surge,&quot; but it&apos;s a big rebuke nonetheless. Still waiting to see the vote count, and whether this will be cast by the mainstream media as a &quot;bipartisan rebuke,&quot; or just a Democratic rebuke. UPDATE: The House resolution passed 246 to 182, with 17 votes from Republicans. FURTHER UPDATE: Here&apos;s how the Washington delegation voted: Yea: McDermott (D), Smith (D), Inslee (D), Dicks (D), Larsen (D) Nay: McMorris (R), Hastings (R), Reichert (R) No vote: Baird (D)...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:27:32 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:23:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I see Sheriff Fake-o Reichert is still thinking independently just like all of his supporters said he would.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635417</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635417</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:05:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yo, Bush, you been p0wned!</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635428</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635428</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:17:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike in MO</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I know I'm being a dick, but so what? I know symbolism has its place in politics, but doesn't this fit under the catagory of "Barely better than nothing"?</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike in MO</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635434</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635434</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:19:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by golob</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm kinda with you Mike, except this might set the stage for tougher resolutions, like a new AUMF or refusal to fund the addition of new troops.</p>

<p>Call me hopeful. In the least, it removes one more fig-leaf from Bush.</p>]]></description>
<author>golob</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635438</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635438</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by keshmeshi</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ew, I don't want to see that bastard naked.</p>]]></description>
<author>keshmeshi</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635493</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635493</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rave Deichert</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thinking is not in the requirement list for the current crap crop of Rebumblekins.   A vote for Reichert is a vote for the current Reich.</p>]]></description>
<author>Rave Deichert</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635514</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635514</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:31:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cascadian</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What's Brian Baird's excuse?</p>

<p>Inslee's people posted a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-CUQVR-GMI" rel="nofollow">video of his speech</a> on YouTube. </p>]]></description>
<author>Cascadian</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635551</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635551</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by COMTE</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Eli, Eli, Eli, according to Uncle Jim, we're not to call it a "surge", it's an "escalation", remember?</p>]]></description>
<author>COMTE</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635576</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c635576</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:17:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by old timer</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@ 7  Brian Baird's 'excuse'</p>

<p>According to one of the local TV news programs, Mr. Baird was attending the funeral of a family member.</p>

<p>IMO, he's always been a good rep for WA and has my $$ even tho he's out of my district.</p>]]></description>
<author>old timer</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c636285</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c636285</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jytcoznw ulsdhxca</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>rpucyskwf inxftq vbzfuie bsnjqevdr mjtro asrnpw ltov</p>]]></description>
<author>jytcoznw ulsdhxca</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652898</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652898</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jytcoznw ulsdhxca</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>rpucyskwf inxftq vbzfuie bsnjqevdr mjtro asrnpw ltov</p>]]></description>
<author>jytcoznw ulsdhxca</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652911</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652911</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:22:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jytcoznw ulsdhxca</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>rpucyskwf inxftq vbzfuie bsnjqevdr mjtro asrnpw ltov</p>]]></description>
<author>jytcoznw ulsdhxca</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652921</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652921</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:22:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jytcoznw ulsdhxca</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>rpucyskwf inxftq vbzfuie bsnjqevdr mjtro asrnpw ltov</p>]]></description>
<author>jytcoznw ulsdhxca</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652949</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_us_house_votes_to_rebuke_president_b#c652949</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>