Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Re: Dennis Johnson, RIP | Pride Doesn't Pay »

Friday, February 23, 2007

The Contenders: Wesley Clark

posted by on February 23 at 9:33 AM

Sure, November 2008 is nearly two years away, but it’s
apparently never too early to declare one’s intention to run for president, and thus it’s never too early to get to know the people who might be the next leader of the free world. This month we’ll be taking a brief look at them.

clark.jpg

Wesley Clark

Party: Democrat

Age: 63

Status: Undeclared

www.securingamerica.com

When asked about his initial support for the Iraq war and the early intelligence indications of weapons of mass destruction, retired four star General Wesley Clark explained: “Well, I think when you look at intelligence, you get indicators. It’s like a sort of gray goo as you look at it. You can’t see through it, exactly, and if you try to touch it, it gets real sticky and you might actually interfere with the information that you’re getting back.” Which means that he’s yet another Democrat struggling to square his earlier statements about the war with what turned out to be the reality.

Wesley Kanne Clark was born in Chicago, IL in 1944. His mother was a Methodist bank secretary, and his father, Benjamin Kanne, was a Jewish Lawyer and Democratic Alderman. Upon the sudden death of Benjamin when Clark was 4 years old, his mother moved them to Little Rock, Arkansas. There his mother met and soon married a banker by the name of Viktor Clark. When he was 16, Wesley Clark officially took his step-father’s last name. Clark was raised a Baptist, and did not find out about his Jewish heritage until he was in graduate school in England, when a member of his father’s family tracked him down.

When he was 15, Clark was sent to a Military Boarding school in Tennessee for the year because Little Rock public schools were closed due to the desegregation battles there. In 1962, he went to West Point, where he graduated as the Valedictorian. He met his wife, Gertrude Kingston, while he was cadet at West Point. Clark then went on to a Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford, where he studied Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. After basic training, he was promoted to captain, assigned to a position in the 1st Infantry Division, and then sent to Vietnam on May 21st, 1969.

In Vietnam, he first worked in a staff position, where he was awarded a Bronze star. A month into his first command, Clark was shot in a battle four times and was sent to Valley Forge Hospital in Pennsylvania to recuperate. He was awarded the Silver star for his conduct during that battle. He had converted to his wife’s faith of Catholicism while in Vietnam.

Clark then embarked on a long military career in which he commanded a number of different battalions in a number of different locations, including Kentucky, Colorado, Germany, and DC (where he worked for the Army Chief of Staff). Clark was promoted to full Colonel when he graduated from the National War College in 1983 and to Brigadier General in 1989 when he was in command of the National Training Center at Fort Irwin. He held this and other training command posts in Virginia and Texas throughout the Gulf War. He was promoted to Lieutenant General in 1994 and served as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff until 1996 when he was promoted to full General and named to the United States Southern Command, where he notably supported the notorious School Of the Americas (a combat training school for Latin American soldiers known for its graduates’ extreme brutality).

In 1997, Clark was appointed by Bill Clinton to the post of Supreme Allied Commander Europe which put him in charge of all of NATO’s forces in Europe during the time of the Kosovo war. Following a UN resolution, Clark led the 1999 bombing campaign on Serbia which ended with the resignation of Slobodan Milošević. Though the campaign had been successful, Clark was forced out of the military due to a personality conflict with his superiors, or possibly because another general needed his post in order not to be forced to retire himself.

In 2000, Clark took a position with an investment firm in Little Rock. He also served as a military commentator for CNN. Since 2005, he has served as a military and foreign affairs analyst for Fox news and, in 2006, he joined the Burkle Center for International Relations at UCLA as a senior fellow.

Clark is pro-choice, pro-death penalty, and against de-criminalizing marijuana. He thinks the surge is a mistake, and believes the UN should be in control in Iraq. Clark had a lot of support in his 2004 bid for Democratic nomination, most notably from liberal documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, billionaire philanthropist George Soros, and Madonna. Although early polls showed him leading the democratic field of candidates, Clark chose not to attend the Iowa primaries because of Howard Dean’s assumed win there. After Dean and Gephart both stumbled in Iowa, Kerry and Edwards picked up steam, and Clark’s campaign was never fully able to recover.

Here’s one of his 2004 campaign ads in which he discusses the hip-hop group Outkast:

Posted by Eli’s Intern: Sage Van Wing

Previously: John Edwards, John McCain, Bill Richardson, Mitt Romney, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Barack Obama, Sam Brownback, Christopher J. Dodd, Newt Gingrich, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Huckabee, Tom Vilsack, Joe Biden, Duncan Hunter, Tommy Thompson, Ron Paul, James Gilmore III, and Tom Tancredo.

RSS icon Comments

1

Why is the L in "Jewish Lawyer" capitalized? It makes it look like that's some kind of special category or something. "Lawyer" is not a proper noun and doesn't want capitalizing except at the beginning of a sentence, unlike "Realtor (tm)" which should always be capitalized and accompanied by a (tm) and an audible snicker.

Posted by Fnarf | February 23, 2007 10:12 AM
2

It's interesting watching that ad right after having read that book Welcome to the Homeland - he's a candidate who could potentially play well with the "homelanders," but that's the most metro ad I think I've ever seen.

Posted by Levislade | February 23, 2007 10:17 AM
3

Lede graf is categorical bullshit. What's the underlying agenda?

Posted by RonK, Seattle | February 23, 2007 10:18 AM
4

I really like Clark but I think he would make a better VP spot or Secretary of Defense. I think he would Better serve America if he was running the Department of Defense.

Posted by Jake of 8bitjoystick.com | February 23, 2007 10:22 AM
5

I'd rather be Waiting for Gore.

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 23, 2007 12:14 PM
6

I'd rather be Waiting for Gore.

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 23, 2007 12:16 PM
7

Do you think he's a Speakerboxxx or Love Below kinda guy?

Posted by thegrizzle | February 23, 2007 12:22 PM
8

@Will in Seattle: I am with you about Gore. But the question is HOW to get him to run (with Osama as his running mate). My idea is to kidnap the former VP and "make him an offer he can’t refuse". Hell, to avoid Hillary becoming the nominee and subsequently loosing the general election I think that forcing Gore to run is a viable option.

Maybe Gore is just hanging out in the wings until everyone is sick of Hillary avoiding taking responsibility for her vote for amounted to a blank check to the town drunk of Crawford Texas. Then will he come into the race as the liberal’s saving grace? He has won the White House before you know. He can do it two more times. It just makes sense. America can have a flash back to the prosperity of the 90’s since Gore was part of that. AND not have to deal with the soap opera that was the Clintons. PLUS, we get Obama working as VP for 8 years and BAM! He is all ready for his 8 years in the Oval Office.

In closing, can any of us really get thrilled about Hillary? And with Nader promising to run if Hillary is the nominee just pushes the White House back to the Republicans. So come on SLOG! Let’s push/force/coerce Gore to run for the White House. We have to show Gore that he may not want to run, but the country needs him NOW!

Posted by Andrew | February 23, 2007 12:33 PM
9

#8--Osama?

Gore's not running, and frankly, remembering his 2000 campaign, I'm OK with that. He'd be about number 5 on my list even if he was running.

Posted by Cascadian | February 23, 2007 12:40 PM
10

Sorry about the Typo on his name. That was really bad and again I am sorry. But #9 are you really really fine with Hillary? She had the test of her judgement on the Iraq vote. She failed that test and people died. It is game over for her. Hillary could have been honest about the mistake when she was first questioned about it but instead she play "trianglation politics". She puts her political goals ahead of all else. Look at her smear attack on Obama this past week!

Posted by Andrew | February 23, 2007 12:51 PM
11

Sept 23, 2002

Senator Max Cleland: ...if you took out Saddam Hussein and the Baath party, the secularist party, don't the Sunnis and the Shiite Muslims make up a majority of the population in Iraq, and wouldn't that give Iran a strong hand there and we ultimately end up creating a Muslim state even under Democratic institutions?

Wesley Clark: Are you asking..

Senator Max Cleland: Yes Sir.

Wesley Clark: Yes Sir, I think there's a substantial risk in the aftermath of the operation that we could end up with a problem which is more intractable than we have today. One thing we're pretty clear on is that Saddam has a very effective police state apparatus. He doesn't allow challenges to his authority inside that state. When we go in there with a transitional government and a military occupation of some indefinite duration, it's also very likely that if there is an effective Al-Quaeda left, and there certainly will be an effective organization of extremists, they will pour into that country. Because they must compete for the Iraqi people. The Wahabis with the Sunnis, the Shias from Iran working with the Shia population. So it's not beyond consideration that we would have a radicalized state even under a US occupation in the aftermath.

YouTube Link..

Posted by RP | February 23, 2007 1:19 PM
12
Posted by RP | February 23, 2007 1:21 PM
13

The Primaries are nearly a year away not two. Change your header.

Posted by Eric | February 23, 2007 2:41 PM
14

November 2008 is still about two years away, Eric. Since the Washington primary is one of the last and hence least important, it's still going to be roughly 2 years before most of us vote on these guys.

Posted by Megan | February 23, 2007 3:10 PM
15

@8 - I'm thrilled about Sen. Clinton as the Ambassador to the UN, actually.

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 23, 2007 3:29 PM
16

So... Is Clark actually showing any real interest in running? Or are we now getting down to purely speculative candidates?

Oh, and the idea of Nader making another independent run makes me want to hit myself on the forehead with a hammer. Have we learned nothing?

Posted by SDA in SEA | February 23, 2007 5:29 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).