Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The MC5 Were Not Punk. The MC5... | Today (and Beyond) On Line Out »

Monday, February 12, 2007

The Bluest Door

posted by on February 12 at 14:23 PM

I went to see Blue Door by Tanya Barfield at the Rep on Saturday night. It was okay—the writing, the performances. None of it will linger long in my memory.

The play concerns Lewis, a black mathematics professor (Reg E. Cathey, clearly at ease on stage and pleasurable to watch) recently divorced and up for a night of insomnia and visits from the ghosts of his ancestors (played by the hardworking—sometimes too obviously so—Hubert Point-Du Jour).

Lewis has lived his life with the constant accusation of being Not Black Enough—by a black student who calls him an Uncle Tom, by the memory of his dead brother, by his white wife who divorced him, in part, for not attending the Million Man March—while the world in general sees him as Too Black (by virtue of being at all black). But Lewis is an intelligent, wry man and seems to live uneasily with, by not hobbled by, this tension.

This is the argument of the play, established in the first scene: Lewis is getting carried away by some kind of classical music (Bach?) while an African voice, singing in Yoruba, keeps interrupting. Then the ancestors come and tell the stories of courting during slavery, being castrated and hanged for trying to vote, and what they think of Lewis: “no matter how many polysyllabic words come out of your mouth, you can’t never escape… being black hangs over you like a shroud. You’re shackled by your blackness.”

Most of the play is anecdotes from 200 years of a black American family (some are amusing, many are sad, many are flat), but the tension between Too Black and Not Black Enough remains—Lewis wants to get lost in Wittgenstein and pi while everyone else pushes him towards blue notes and black history, including the playwright. In the final scene, Lewis has abandoned his classical rapture and is happily singing the Yoruba song with his great-grandfather. It’s a touching image but a morally unsettling way to end the play. Is Barfield saying that a black American isn’t complete until he digs into his Africanness? That he cannot, if he chooses, live on Bach alone?

That conclusion seems kind of… limiting.

RSS icon Comments

1

I felt a similar way about what the play seems to end up saying. I'm glad Lewis has confronted his family's past and faced his demons and whatnot, but the guy's clearly an intellectual. He likes philosophy, he likes Bach. The way the play presents it, it's like he gets an authenticity makeover which is gonna make everything better. It felt like Barfield ducked, there.

Posted by MvB | February 12, 2007 3:46 PM
2

I have not seen this play yet but maybe he chooses both in the end. The final scence shows him embracing his African roots yet he probably still enjoys Bach. Why can't he have both?

Posted by MAYBE | February 12, 2007 4:54 PM
3

I saw the play last night, thought it was well written and acted and asked some questions we all face: "Who am I?", "Why am I who I am?" and "Now what?"

I'd like to know if there's a connection between the writer, Tanya Barfield and British author Owen Barfield (1898-1997) who wrote: "In the common words we use everyday, souls of past races, the thoughts and feelings of individual men stand around us, not dead, but frozen into their attitudes like the couriers in the garden of the Sleeping Beauty."

Posted by Jeanne | February 12, 2007 8:51 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).