Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Olympia: My Two Personal Favorite Pieces of Legislation After the First Month of Session. (And My Least Favorite.)

1

Woof!

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 12, 2007 12:24 PM
2

Josh,
Tell the truth, big guy. It's much more than not being "into" dogs. You are afraid of dogs. C'mon big guy. Tell us why before Joel Connelly works you into his next column.

Posted by Face the truth, tough guy | February 12, 2007 12:55 PM
3

The city workers are going to haul the dog shit anyway, whether it's from my residential trash or the cans in the dog parks.

Posted by Eric F | February 12, 2007 1:04 PM
4

You're right Eric, that crap would have been hauled off with the residential trash- which YOU PAY the city to collect. It isn't about hauling shit, it is about us non-dog owners subsidizing your little companion more than we already do. I don't have a dog because I live in a city and don't want to deal with picking up shit. Your comment makes me think of all the folks who don't want to pick up shit- even though they got a dog and they're now responsible for it. I don't have a problem with dogs, just their owners.

Posted by pileocrap | February 12, 2007 2:27 PM
5

Thanks for paying for my (licensed) dog, Josh, pileocrap, and every other citizen of Seattle. I'm also grateful for you paying for my son's education, whether you have a kid or not. Cheers!

Posted by Eric F | February 12, 2007 2:56 PM
6

Eric - did you wake up on the wrong side of the park bench again?

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 12, 2007 3:57 PM
7

How about the god damn Pork for NASCAR
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/Summary.aspx?bill=2062&year=2007#history

That some of KING COUNTY's Elected officials are trying to cram down Kitsap County's throats?

Where is the coverage in the Stranger? Where is the outrage?

Posted by Jake of 8bitjoystick.com | February 12, 2007 4:34 PM
8

Josh whats the difference between setting aside park land for one use (soccer) or another (dog park).

And if you don't like going to bars with dogs then go to bars that won't allow dogs. Its not like the bill makes it mandatory. There will be bars for dogs and bars for not.

Posted by Giffy | February 12, 2007 6:50 PM
9

awgzpnsqt rvcpwubh mspqov sdfv imqbrz dhkjv iyavtrong

Posted by nzxwat lxni | March 2, 2007 12:25 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).