Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Day One at the Watada Court-Martial

1

Generals speak out against our war policy and other military policies all the time, and they don't have to give up their commission to do so? Why is Watada prosecuted for that charge while others are not?

Posted by Brendan | February 5, 2007 11:35 PM
2

Retired generals do.

I'm still just shocked that the giant puppets can't save the Lieutenant.

Posted by Fnarf | February 6, 2007 7:56 AM
3

i don't think it was the speaking out that got him in trouble initially. he got attention by refusing to go to iraq.

Posted by konstantconsumer | February 6, 2007 8:03 AM
4

Part of the UCMJ (Uniformed Code of Military Justice) states clearly that officers cannot speak out against the government, commander in chief, or any other ranking offical. Officers learn this in the required OCS (Officer Candidicy School). And no, you can't just resign your commission. That's like saying, "why can't enlisted soldiers leave the military?" They sign a contract, and that stipulates how long they have to serve. Its extremely hard to get out of your military contract. So no, I don't think he should be allowed to "get out of it" or even serve 6 months in jail. He went AWOL, made public statements against the government, and made statements against his command.


And no. An officer does not have the right to an opinion. It sounds harsh, but he knew that when he signed up. There is a reason for that, and if you have not been in a command structure, then you would not understand the necessity. There is no sympathy on the obvious bus that has left stupid town.

Posted by Monique | February 6, 2007 9:09 AM
5

Even Sean Penn being there to activate his Wonder Twin powers with the giant puppets can't save the Lieutenant. I'm positively floored.

Posted by Form of...a waste of skin | February 6, 2007 9:13 AM
6

Generals speak out against our war policy and other military policies all the time, and they don't have to give up their commission to do so? Why is Watada prosecuted for that charge while others are not?

Because Watada refused military orders. Those who speak out normally still go.

I think he's going to jail. The trump card: he enlisted AFTER we began war in Iraq. He had to know what he was signing up to do. If he had a problem with going to Iraq, then he shouldn't have enlisted. No one put a gun to his head and made him sign up, and that everyone here supports him in this little stunt speaks volumes about how fractured and simple-minded your dogma is, and why Republicans have run this country for the last several years.

Posted by Gomez | February 6, 2007 10:12 AM
7

It is required in court martial hearings that all members of the jury be higher ranking officers than the accused. A jury of your peers indeed.

That is the thing about the UCMJ. You give up certain civil rights when you enlist or accept a commission. One of those is the right to a jury of your peers. No reason to be snide about it. Sage.

It simply is what it is.

Posted by Brian | February 6, 2007 12:05 PM
8

Watada is still the most honorable man whose words and convictions we have heard in a while, though. Good luck, and thanks to him.

Posted by Grant Cogswell | February 7, 2007 2:50 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).