Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on "Blanket" Jackson: Unmasked and Undangled!

1

Whoa! You know you're rich when you can have Whitney Houston as your nanny! :p

Posted by Tsuki | February 2, 2007 3:47 PM
2

You know you are stupid assholes when you put beautiful innocent children in the foreground of you asshole silly shit.

ASSHOLES

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Oh, I know - such a boring Friday, and no pets to torture.

Posted by sammy | February 2, 2007 3:53 PM
3

Sammy needs a hug.

Posted by David Schmader | February 2, 2007 3:54 PM
4

As pointed out in the TMZ comments: these children do not appear to be half black. Debbie Rowe was white, but she wasn't that white. These kids look more like Madonna's children than Michael Jackson's.

Posted by Aislinn | February 2, 2007 4:03 PM
5

No, David need to look at a standard definition of cruel and crude and rude - ie, mocking little kids is frankly weird.

Posted by sidney | February 2, 2007 4:05 PM
6


Aislinn - remember plantation fucking the Nigra women mode.


a

Posted by Andrezel | February 2, 2007 4:09 PM
7

They have such adorable, tiny noses.

Posted by JC | February 2, 2007 4:17 PM
8

It would be so awesome to be six and have the whole world make fun of you just because you were born.

this is very sad....

Posted by m | February 2, 2007 4:18 PM
9

Poor kids. Could be worse. Their last name could be Cheney-Poe.

Posted by monkey | February 2, 2007 4:23 PM
10

I feel sorry for those kids, not because Wacko is their "father", but if you read into the TMZ post, these pictures were taken at CIRCUS CIRCUS CASINO in Las Vegas. Has anyone BEEN to Circus Circus lately? That casino is HELL on earth....

Posted by KELLY O | February 2, 2007 4:43 PM
11

How can I become a paparazzi? Looks like a fun gig.

Posted by frederick r | February 2, 2007 4:46 PM
12

Seriously, why does anyone still give a fuck about this douche bag?

Posted by Mike in MO | February 2, 2007 4:57 PM
13

These are not a black man's children.

Posted by Sam | February 2, 2007 5:44 PM
14

Mike, the proper term is paparazzo. Which is paparazzi, but singular.

Posted by Vivian McKechnie | February 2, 2007 6:12 PM
15

I thought the stranger would draw a line at exploiting children.
I am wrong.

Posted by Zander | February 2, 2007 10:35 PM
16

No David, Sammy needs some grammer. Probably a nap too.

Vivian, Mike didn't say anything about the paparazzi. Who the fuck cares what the proper term is? They make sportscasters seem important.

Posted by PDXRitchie | February 3, 2007 2:39 AM
17

I have always wondered who's the real father or fathers of those kids and if when they get older they will be curious themselves.

Posted by Brian | February 3, 2007 10:57 AM
18

#16 - just above

Your grammer is the sweet and fawning old lady who gave birth to your mother or father.

Grammar, the correct spelling, has to do with language syntax.

Exploiting kids frosts me, be they from any well know family. Cheap, rude, unkind, not needed and very bad tawdry journalism.

David needs to stick with snippets from the Times and PI which have already been read by most.

Posted by Sammy | February 3, 2007 2:18 PM
19

bitch

Posted by pimpin | February 14, 2007 6:20 AM
20

yall are such ass-holes!!!!!!!

Posted by pimpet | February 14, 2007 6:21 AM
21

Those Kids are 100% White.
no black man can Have three white kids.
Blanket needs a hair cut BAD!!!

Posted by A.E. | February 14, 2007 2:59 PM
22

cqdkymg zmoikn zauxioe nsfuia ilsuat eukaoyrbm lawxmph

Posted by wsmunjv ywmnsqhzg | February 17, 2007 9:24 AM
23

lophuzbi qxld lgxtduzw vksl ktynauhm obmtcglk ntobh http://www.buvetryd.uirszq.com

Posted by koiyc zpnyv | February 17, 2007 9:25 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).