Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Today's Gay Agenda


You gotta give props for the righteous turn of a phrase in "homosexual PC puffery," though. Sounds dirty! (And possibly computer-related. I hear with Homosexual Mac Puffery there's far less chance of contracting a virus.)

Posted by flamingbanjo | January 30, 2007 9:29 AM

I'm 100% all for it... if the child/doctors/parents are sure that it's not some kind of phase or result of abuse, etc. Getting these kids on the proper hormones early will make sure they live a normal life (the junk chopping can wait).

Has there ever been a boy who identified as a girl through age 18 and then suddenly changed his mind as an adult? Ex-TG's, where are you?

Posted by jamier | January 30, 2007 10:02 AM

The perfect solution. Have your underage cock AND take it with you while you're on the go.

Posted by Matt | January 30, 2007 10:46 AM

Yeah, but neither is ok in Canada, where stoning is OUT.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 30, 2007 11:08 AM

Will this play be showing in Enumclaw?

Posted by Just Wondering | January 30, 2007 11:09 AM


You must be the only person in the world who reads press releases from Concerned Women for America.

I'm giggling picturing them feverishly huddled around their computer monitor waiting for the website counter to turn over to 0000001 when you click on the link.

And I hope they know it's you ; )

Posted by Original Andrew | January 30, 2007 11:24 AM

Is this kid's name Hedwig?

Posted by JC | January 30, 2007 11:56 AM

I thought it was feminists who want to chop off cocks.

Posted by keshmeshi | January 30, 2007 12:14 PM

I actually do think it's best to make people wait until they're 18 to have their sex change operations. The NYTimes article said that 80% grow up to be non-transgendered, so it's better safe than sorry. I certainly believe that a young child can know that he or she was born with the body parts that don't correspond with his or her identity, but a five year old also shouldn't be making a permanent choice, just in case it is a phase.

Posted by Westenera | January 30, 2007 1:34 PM

A couple of things - trans women don't "chop off" their male genitals - they reuse it to form female genitalia. Talking about chopping off penises is inaccurate and, frankly, the sort of insensitivity that is all too common from gay men. Please stop it.

The other thing is that although trans organizations may, for political reasons, not outwardly support genital surgery for a transperson before he or she reaches 18, many (if not most) of us accept that a transperson can know what he or she needs long before age 18. In time, I believe that society will accept surgeries earlier than 18.

Posted by Sachi | January 30, 2007 5:53 PM

LMAO @ flamingbanjo

Posted by Mike in MO | January 30, 2007 6:22 PM

As in their last media campaign that blamed the Barbie website for promoting the "gay agenda" and gender confusion when they offered kids check boxes marked "male", "female", or "I don't know", the Concerned Women for America once again insists on having a man speak for them...

How is this not confusing to the children?

Posted by tina_socal | January 30, 2007 9:16 PM

cveigjdqy meilfrv ehxrfbny btnwxvrku obfhpnlt rgyo rydcg

Posted by qlidxs fwiojn | February 19, 2007 7:13 PM

cveigjdqy meilfrv ehxrfbny btnwxvrku obfhpnlt rgyo rydcg

Posted by qlidxs fwiojn | February 19, 2007 7:14 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).