Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The Contenders: Mitt Romney

1

he's the next rick santorum

Posted by blehpunk | January 5, 2007 4:32 PM
2

Apropos name -- his face looks like a catcher's mitt.

Posted by DOUG. | January 5, 2007 4:37 PM
3

we're all in trouble if people are willing to buy into McCain as a "moderate".

Posted by josh | January 5, 2007 4:37 PM
4

Agreed--Mc Cain is not now a moderate, and has never been one. By most measures of Congressional votes he is firmly far right. He just talks nice...

Posted by CJA | January 5, 2007 5:07 PM
5

Mitt is a great man who will make a great President, if the politics of religious hatred and bigotry can pull its head out of its collective butts, and vote for an honest, decent, successful man who will truly make a difference ... he will LEAD, rather than follow.

Posted by BigAl | January 5, 2007 7:01 PM
6

You say "He finds Roe v. Wade regrettable and is firmly pro-life."

You might want to correct that to "firmly against abortion, with the exception of rape, incest, or the mother's health."

Posted by dell | January 5, 2007 8:01 PM
7

Mitt Romney's gift that keeps giving was to slash $25 million in human services funding on the way out.

Nothing to do with religious hatred, my friend, it's just that, well, he sucks. If he's so damn religous shouldn't he be helping the poor and not crushing them?

Posted by M-Ass | January 5, 2007 8:03 PM
8

I live in Massachusetts. He. Is. Awful. I mean I would take another case of herpes infected syphilis, which I got from Dan, before I would EVER live in a state ruled by him again.

Posted by StrangerDanger | January 5, 2007 8:30 PM
9

There isn't anyone on the D side with his charisma, track record, or fiscal experience. Obama is too new, Edwards is a slimy, poverty exploiting trial lawyer, and Clinton is too vague. The limp-wristed socialist left underestimates this man at their own peril.

Posted by ektachrome | January 5, 2007 9:01 PM
10

You people are pathetic when you cry about Romney's cuts to the bloated, billions of $$ out-of-balance MASS budget (which Romney balanced without raising taxes I might add). Improving the job environment (thousands of jobs GAINED) granting health care to hundreds of thousands of low income families, and doing it with the outright antagonism of the legislature is more than any bleeding heart lib ever did as governor. Look at your beloved Hillary in NY: fewer jobs than when she carpet bagged her way in, a budget that's ludicrously out of whack and not a single major accomplishment to speak of (ala health care). If you think Romney was so bad, pray tell who was the Democratic governor that balanced a 3 billion dollar budget without raising taxes? You never had it so good, and you don't have the good sense to thank heaven that a man named Mitt Romney reigned in your out of control legislature.

But I guess knocks on Romney and the herpes that you carry around from your gay romps make you feel better.

Posted by George McGurkin | January 5, 2007 9:10 PM
11

Paradoxically, it was liberal tolerant Massachussetts that could elect a Mormon.

The Christian Right barely exists there. In the USA however they are important in the R nomination process, and asking that bunch to vote for a Mormon is like asking Iraqi Shiites to vote for a Sunni.

They'd sooner vote for a black dude. At least Obama is Christian.

Posted by Not From The Lost Tribe | January 5, 2007 10:48 PM
12

When I first discovered Romney, I thought he didn't have a prayer because he was Mormon. But, over the last few weeks I've looked at his record and speeches and found that he's a powerful leader. He has great potential to lead our country forward and past many problems we face today. I could care less whether he is Mormon or not. My only hope through this campaign is that he will be classified as "Romney the leader" instead of "Romney the Mormon."

Posted by David | January 5, 2007 11:14 PM
13

"Romney the leader"?

How about "Romney the fucking hypocrite"? Yeah, I like that better. Santorum was an asshat, but at least he was consistent. I disagreed with him on nearly any conceivable position, but at least he was honest about his beliefs, and acted on them (much to my dismay, most of the time). Romney's previous support of gay rights, and his recent 180 to now hating on teh gays pisses me off to no end. Caving in to the religious right and gay bashing to score points with the wackos is not my idea of leadership. It's my idea of pandering.

Piss off Romney.

Posted by SDA in SEA | January 6, 2007 12:26 AM
14

William the Conquerer used to be called William the Bastard. Anyone want to guess how he got himself re-named? Ignore Romney at your peril.

Posted by Munga | January 6, 2007 8:17 AM
15

But we've already had a President who's a Moron. What's the big deal?

Posted by Fnarf | January 6, 2007 10:17 AM
16

AS IF ANY REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT IS CLINGING TO SUPPORT POTENTIAL FROM THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF SEATTLE......

SOME NEED FOR POSTERS HERE TO DETACH FROM ALL THE ANGST AND ANSWER THE QUESTION, MIGHT HE BE NOMINATED ??

FROM WHAT I SEE, HE IS THEIR BEST CHANCE ..... CORRUPTION FREE. NATIONAL NAME. TEN STATES ON BOARD TO START.

HE IS A BETTER SPEAKER THAN CLINTON. PERFECT CRAGGY MALE LOOKS FOR TV.

OH, I FORGOT, RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY IS THE DECIDING FACTOR. CALL THE GHOST OF JFK FOR COMMENT ON THAT OLD CANARD.

Posted by sidney | January 6, 2007 11:22 AM
17

FWIW in his departure, the good people of MA voted in an unabashed leftist, after years of mind-numbing Republican recidivism (Weld, to Celluci, to Swift (gah, hack, cough, spit, sorry about that)).

Posted by Keith T. | January 11, 2007 1:36 AM
18

And remember: A New England Republican plays like a pinko hippie freak in Utah.

Posted by K | January 11, 2007 1:38 AM
19

What in general programs exist for the help family with low income? WBR LeoP

Posted by Health Pharmacy | January 21, 2007 4:50 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).