Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Something the Democrats Are Doing In Olympia This Session

1

Is there a companion Senate bill?

Good luck getting past Senator Margarita Prentice, Chair of the Senate Ways & Means Committee, and friend of the payday loan industry.

Posted by Sey | January 3, 2007 12:56 PM
2

About frickin time. And Margarita had better stand down, before she gets rolled over.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 3, 2007 12:57 PM
3

Is it really a good idea? I know those places are evil, but maybe they are occasionally necessary to some people, and with a fee capped at 36 percent, they may close up shop.

Plus, the other sad part of these places ithe fees they charge just to cash a check. To me, seeing someone pay a 10% fee for his own money is far worse than have someone pay 400% interest on a short-term loan. The bill should put that shit on there too.

Posted by Andrew | January 3, 2007 12:59 PM
4

Yeah right. You forget who OWNS most of those places - the very same banks that turn you down. Follow the money/ownership trail. Capping the usury at 36 percent only means they will have to play by the rules and stop trying to bankrupt us.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 3, 2007 1:15 PM
5

Rather than this draconian regulation, how about a tax with a rate proportional to the interest rate of the loan? If a company charges a higher interest rate to a customer, they are forced to pay a higher tax on their profit. That would allow market forces to curtail usury.

Posted by kyle | January 3, 2007 1:31 PM
6

I just found out from my assistant this morning that Wells Fargo charged him $5 to cash a payroll check. That too should be illegal- especially since it's coming directly from my account with them. Banking fees are way out of hand.

Posted by Dave Coffman | January 3, 2007 1:56 PM
7

Good point, Dave. Any bank that accepts social security checks should have standard accounts that charge $0 to cash a payroll check.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 3, 2007 5:11 PM
8

Did he not have an account at WF, Dave? I can see them doing that if he didn't hold an account there. If they don't have a relationship with the guy, they're on the hook if they cash the guy's check and it's a bad check.

Posted by Gomez | January 3, 2007 11:27 PM
9

Kyle 5 - No, that would also disrupt the market (like all taxes). Large loans would become unprofitable, and lenders would stop making them.

This bill is the wrong solution to a bad problem. It tries to curtail the supply of loans when we should be limiting the demand -- by educating people about money-management and helping people make ends meet.

Posted by Bacon Cheese Egg | January 4, 2007 7:50 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).