<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Sculpture Study Group, Part II</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/sculpture_study_grou</link>
<description>The sculptor Erwin Wurm asks the question—or has a fat house do it for him—can an artwork be fat? (If you haven&apos;t already, check the Wurm show at the Frye.) What about, can an artwork be dead? How do you know it&apos;s dead? In this week&apos;s In/Visible podcast, up now here, we try to determine at what point Joseph Beuys&apos;s dried-up, clamped-together fat wedges and other works like it become, well, like Terri Schiavo. What about when artists put the DNR stamp on their works, and conservators ignore it? What would be the point of making a sculpture that&apos;s destined...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:15:16 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:09:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by ALPHABETICS</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SOOOO much for the ARTDISH link. I laughed till I cried. I think you should invite a review from "Big Mouth". His (I thought it was a her at first) poorly informed, subjective rants from, of all places, Bellingham would give me reason to open The Stranger.</p>]]></description>
<author>ALPHABETICS</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/sculpture_study_grou#c587610</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/sculpture_study_grou#c587610</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:09:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>