Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Seattle Looks to Re-Devo Old I... | Anne Heche »

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Good Grief! Redesigned Section Induces Spontaneous Screaming

posted by on January 24 at 16:02 PM

You’d better be sitting down for this one: The Seattle Times just launched a new Sunday Styles section! And dig this, kids: It’s “edgy”! “Fun”! “Bold and not for everyone!” For “people living life to the fullest”! Well… “You know who you are.”

Basically, the redesign appears to be geared toward either a) septuagenarians or b) people with utter contempt for the English language. Everything’s BIG (sorry— “bold”!) and blocky, with entire “stories” contained in chunky little blocks of large-print text. (Knitting AND emo? It’s like they know me!) The “new tone” is what the sixtysomething dudes running things over on Fairview probably consider “breezy” and “conversational”; it consists mainly of inserting “ums” and rhetorical dear-reader questions (“you say there’s something different about today’s Sunday Life section?”) pretty much at random all over the place. And while I was planning to take on every single damn article in the section, my head exploded somewhere between the intro (featuring a cartoon of a “very, um, retro-looking blonde”) and a truly vomit-inducing piece on “dog parks that are worth the drive.” So we’ll have to confine ourselves to the front page.

It’s pretty clear that Fancher & Co. think what “people living life to the fullest” want is more of “quirky-Asian-girl-who’s-really-into-shopping” Pamela Sitt (nee “TV Addict”), because they’ve positioned her new column, “Girl About Town,” at the very top of the page, above the masthead. (Way to “think outside the box,” boys!) The inaugural installment takes on the topic of book clubs—specifically, book clubs for men—and proceeds apace through every hoary gender stereotype in the book. Girls don’t like to read? Yep, that’s in there: “So it was that I found myself… an auditor of someone else’s book club—ideal, as I didn’t have to do the reading.” Boys like serious stuff like politics, girls like romance? Check: While the guys were reading up on “the energy crisis, economic collapse, politics,” Sitt’s “erstwhile book club considered reading ‘The Crimson Petal and the White’ by Michael Faber because it was considered ‘steamy,’ but it was 800 pages, which is way too long even if it is educational.” Women really just want to shop and gossip? Oh, yes: “[Forming a book club] surely makes us better people, and makes up for many hours spent shopping and devouring tabloids.” Women looove to yakity-yak and never let men get a word in edgewise? You know it!: “‘Not having women in the group is important,’ said co-founder Brian Clark, ‘because I never get to talk at home.’”

I can’t wait for the next installment. Maybe she can go shopping with a male friend and write about how boys just don’t understand why girls love shoes! I mean, it practically writes itself.

RSS icon Comments

1

Boomers are fading as a viable demographic. They're going after your readers, Stranger!

Posted by Dougsf | January 24, 2007 4:00 PM
2


Wow, that's pretty ditzy. However, I felt this line was somewhat accurate:

"I get the scientific book about how the world is ending, and she gets the book about oppressed women in the Middle East."

It's true, at least in my case (me = woman)

Posted by oh boy | January 24, 2007 4:03 PM
3

Similarly appalled. Maybe she can get a little gay-boy side kick to go shopping with her. You know, that flaming-girl's-best-friend-tell-her-she's-fabulous-type. She needs to have a friend to treat like a non human accessory to add to the absurdity of this trivial creation.

Posted by moral_skeptic | January 24, 2007 4:05 PM
4

Fancher is to style what Erica C. Barnett is to journalism.

Posted by DOUG. | January 24, 2007 4:05 PM
5

NOOOOOOOOOO!

Not the Times!

oh. wait. I canceled my subscription years ago.

Never mind.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 24, 2007 5:07 PM
6

Unfortunately, if you want to read a local newspaper, you have to read the Sunday Times, even if you subscribe to the PI. You can't get a weekday PI-only, no Sunday subscription. I tried.

Posted by Fnarf | January 24, 2007 5:27 PM
7

oh, ag. what a horror. somebody please burn that wretched rag down and spare the poor trees!

Posted by adrian | January 24, 2007 5:36 PM
8

Pamela Sitt looks like quite the little hottie...maybe she could give Erica some tips on how to be less of a shrew and maybe get laid....

Posted by GoodGrief | January 24, 2007 6:34 PM
9

Erica is a goddess, a great journalist and completely, absolutely right. The Times being chummy: It feels like Dick Cheney asking if we want to hang out.

Posted by regina hackett | January 24, 2007 6:52 PM
10

Erica, I love you.

Posted by Mark Mitchell | January 25, 2007 9:35 AM
11

God, how unseemly and tiresome. Why not spend your time doing some real journalism, rather than bore us with endless cheap shots at the Weekly, the dailies, etc.

Posted by BobH | January 25, 2007 11:40 AM
12

Erica, you applied at the Times and got turned down. When you've outgrown your "edgy" little $35K-a-year Stranger gig, you'll apply again. Ha ha. Ha.

Posted by Dash RipRock | February 4, 2007 9:10 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).