<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on NYT Style Section does it again</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again</link>
<description>This bizarre quote from this story on why women still buy with cash to hide their spending habits from their husbands: ...the age-old practice of women disguising personal indulgences by paying in cash persists even though the majority of women today earn a salary and, in an affluent age, families have more disposable income. Which families are those? True, a group of Americans are enjoying a new gilded age. But those who are not are more numerous than before. Even though the gap between the rich and poor gets covered in the main body of the Times, the style section...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:19:34 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:32:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by intellilicious</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>Which families are those?</i></p>

<p>Why, the ones that read the NYT (and its style section in particular), of course. The standard formula of "NYT writer goes to cocktail party, notices some aspect of her friends' lives, and writes about it like it's a national trend" yet lives on.</p>]]></description>
<author>intellilicious</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589113</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589113</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:25:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by StrangerDanger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Angela, you sure got up on the wrong side of the bed!  Time for some shopping therapy.  Don't forget to hit the ATM on the way to Nordys!</p>]]></description>
<author>StrangerDanger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589115</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589115</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Boomer</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>First of all, this <i>is</i>, by any measure, an age of affluence.  Second--so what?  It's the Style Section, not the front page.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Boomer</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589119</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589119</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:38:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by catalina vel-duray</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>While I don't agree that this is an "age of affluence" (It's more like an age of credit, home equity loans and blowing your inheritance) I don't see why the fashion section of the nation's biggest newspaper (which is also one of the fashion capitols of the planet) need tow a proletarian line. </p>]]></description>
<author>catalina vel-duray</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589123</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589123</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:48:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mrobvious</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The woman doesn't want her husband to know how much she spends on expensive clothes so she pays in cash and then appears in an article in the NYT (complete with photo).  Genius!</p>]]></description>
<author>Mrobvious</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589127</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589127</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:09:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SeMe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think we can all agree that, with the exception of the rural class, the lumpenproletariat or the american underclass, are by far the best dressers.</p>]]></description>
<author>SeMe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589128</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589128</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:13:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by PDXRitchie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Toe the line.</p>

<p><br />
With your toe.  You're not bringing the line anywhere.</p>]]></description>
<author>PDXRitchie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589131</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589131</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:32:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Stephanie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"lumpenproletariat or the american underclass, are by far the best dressers": SeMe, have you been in a Wal-Mart or K-Mart lately? You've got to be kidding.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Stephanie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589132</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589132</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:32:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gloria</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think we should take the line ... shopping! </p>]]></description>
<author>Gloria</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589140</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589140</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:29:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by catalina vel-duray</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the correction, PDX. I always thought it was "tow" as in pulling the line along. </p>

<p>You learn something new everyday. </p>]]></description>
<author>catalina vel-duray</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589146</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589146</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:58:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SeMe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>the inner city lumpenproletariat do not shop at Wal Mart Steph, they shop from the truck and buy swag directly.  Granted, Seattle doesnt have that culture, but if u go to the outlet malls, or other places u see tons lumpenproletariats dropping serious cash.  The poorest of the poor are sporting real LVitton, Tommy and some other nonsense which was mos def not bought at Wal Mart.  What you see at Wal Mart is what I call the suburban-barely-working class and the rural clas. The pooorest inner city schools back east are at the vanguard of urban fashion. Sad, but true. In the end, fashionistas (sp?) are nothing but biters.</p>]]></description>
<author>SeMe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589151</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589151</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:33:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jamier</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>everyone can disagree about what is good fashion, but i think everyone can agree that people who use the word "lumpenproletariat" and think that outlet mall tommy hilfiger is top notch fashion, have got to be the worst dressers on the planet</p>]]></description>
<author>jamier</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589155</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589155</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:05:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by sniggles</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>oh burn! </p>]]></description>
<author>sniggles</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589157</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589157</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike in MO</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>totally off topic...am I missing something, or are there no more slog tip links. There was a big story in St. Louis about a missing kid being found alive after almost five years. I know it's not Seattle news, but it's still big...</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike in MO</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589161</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589161</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Amy Kate</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Mike, the Slog tip link has a permanent home at the top of the page now, to the right of SLOG.</p>]]></description>
<author>Amy Kate</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589173</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589173</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:06:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike in MO</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>thanks Amy</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike in MO</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589213</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/nyt_style_section_does_it_again#c589213</guid>
<category>Media</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:32:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>