Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on More on the Bike Program Changes

1

Nobody cares, actually. Doesn't mean anything.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 31, 2007 3:31 PM
2

Meanwhile, here's the bike coordinator for the flat, warm, road debris-free city of Los Angeles, where almost no one rides a bike (yet).

http://www.latimes.com/la-me-bicycle2jan02,0,1097586.story?page=1&coll=la-home-headlines

Posted by Grant Cogswell | January 31, 2007 3:40 PM
3

Sounds like more of Mayor McCheese's micro-managing my-way-or-the-highway (tunnel?) bullshit. He's done hardly a thing for cyclists in 5 years.

Posted by DOUG. | January 31, 2007 4:06 PM
4

Didn't we just vote in a bunch of money for bicycle transportation facilitation? I thought it was too much but I did vote for it. Sounds like someone is going against the mandate.

Posted by mirror | January 31, 2007 4:08 PM
5

It means something to me! I'm paying that damn property tax for road maintenance, you know, the one that was sold as "More bicycle lanes!"

Posted by golob | January 31, 2007 4:10 PM
6

OOOPs. Reading your linked article from Bikeseattle I see that this personnel infighting is a little more complex than you make it appear in your 2nd post on this issue. The bikeseattle makes it sound like maybe there was more of a mandate to support the master plan currently on the table and throw anyone overboard who would create more process.

But truth: I wish I hadn't commented in the first place.

Posted by mirror | January 31, 2007 4:15 PM
7

khuvpw mvukbqyt flcw vgpd cvslzg pujhrft rznvlt

Posted by kowtried ihnwjm | February 10, 2007 8:55 AM
8

khuvpw mvukbqyt flcw vgpd cvslzg pujhrft rznvlt

Posted by kowtried ihnwjm | February 10, 2007 8:55 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).