Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Local Boy in The New Yorker

1


That is a great image. It is interesting how both of their faces are obscured.

Posted by nice | January 15, 2007 12:29 PM
2

Yeah, because there aren't any expressive young women sitting around Seattle dreaming of one day being in The New Yorker...

Posted by Joe | January 15, 2007 12:48 PM
3

oh for fuck's sake #2 - if Eli was talking about a woman photographer, he probably would have said "How many expressive young women are sitting around Seattle dreaming of one day being in The New Yorker?"

jebus. why is it always a fucking argument with you people?

Posted by rubyred | January 15, 2007 12:57 PM
4

I'm pretty sure Andrew Miksys didn't get his work into the New Yorker by sitting around dreaming.

Posted by Fnarf | January 15, 2007 3:42 PM
5

Score! The holy grail of print... and I thought Remnick was a little stuffy...

Posted by jonathan | January 15, 2007 4:13 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).