Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Little Controversy

1

Don't forget the website Crooks and Liars, which always posts its own videos of these crucial TV moments. The O'Reilly and Colbert clips were posted within an hour of their broadcast.

www.crooksandliars.com

Posted by Gurldoggie | January 19, 2007 10:33 AM
2

And this is a surprise to anyone?

I'm old enough to actually know who Rich Little is. I'm guessing half the Stranger readers probably never even heard of the guy. I myself was surprised to hear that he was even still alive. He is the very personification of a safe comedian. At worst, he'll rib the Decider in Chief a bit over his accent (Rich Little's schtick for the last 50 years or so has been light hearted impersonations). He didn't need to tell us there were restrictions placed on his act, and the WHCA didn't need to deny it. We all knew it already.

Oh, and the WHCA's denial doesn't pass the giggle test. Absurd on its face. If the WHCA had any balls at all, they'd follow up last year's Dinner by hiring Jon Stewart this year (although Bush probably wouldn't even show up if they did).

Hiring Rich Little this year only proves that Colbert was right. They're a bunch of cowards.

Posted by SDA in SEA | January 19, 2007 10:38 AM
3

Oh, and Colbert is brilliant.

I don't have cable and I don't watch TV. So I'd never heard of Colbert before last year's WHCA Dinner. When I first watched that clip last year, I didn't really get Colbert. And on first viewing, I didn't think it was all that funny. The subtle nuances of his parody of a right winger kind of flew past me.

I've been watching clips of him on Crooks and Liars, and other websites, over the last year, and he's really grown on me. Once I got what he was about, I find him really funny. I recently re-watched that clip of last year's WHCA Dinner, and this time I laughed my ass off. I get so much more now than I did when I first watched it.

His pairing with O'Riely was masterful. Colbert never really clobbered O'Reily blatantly, but he completely controlled every moment of both interviews, leading O'Reily around by his nose. Continuously mocking him with little jabs throughout. O'Reily could barely get a word in during either show, and looked like a total dufus. Well, he always looks like a dufus, but he's such an arrogant asshole, and he usually totally dominates his guests. To see him have no control of any kind over Colbert was a joy to watch.

Posted by SDA in SEA | January 19, 2007 10:51 AM
4

Colbert definately ruled over O'Reilly. O'R look sheepish and almost meek on the Colbert Report. Hilarious to watch. The "commentators" on O'R after Colbert left, who were discussing why Colbert and Stewart are so popular, were old and completly out of touch. I laughed my ass off while they tried to "figure out" the draw to the comedy central shows. It was so sad when O'R tried to flaunt that he had higher ratings then John Stewart, regardless of their time-slot difference. He came off as pathetic and sad (as always). Does he really get it that the young generation is laughing at him?

Posted by Monique | January 19, 2007 11:33 AM
5

I wonder what Colbert's IQ is. I'm guessing it's sky high.

Posted by keshmeshi | January 19, 2007 11:33 AM
6

Colbert on TV simply keeps talking and yammering away. I hate O'Reilly and would love to jam a falafel down his throat, but nobody can get much of a word in on Colbert's show. Right Dan?

Posted by him | January 19, 2007 1:05 PM
7

Was Larry the Cable Guy already booked for that day?

Posted by elswinger | January 19, 2007 1:19 PM
8

Rich Little should simply not show up at all that night. Just be a no-show. That would be the most useful thing he can do, and a political statement w/o saying anything. He certainly won't cause any problems otherwise. He's like the Gerald Ford of comedy. Bo-o-o-ring!

As for O'R vs Colbert, the reason O'R can't hold a flame to Colbert is because ideologues rely on single-minded thinking. They require everyone to toe the party line and follow their master.
Comedians rely on the fact that there are multiple interpretations... that is the essence of humor in fact. Playing with different points of view.
Keep laughing folks! It'll keep your brain from getting washed. Serious.

Posted by treacle | January 19, 2007 1:56 PM
9
Posted by treacle | January 19, 2007 2:09 PM
10
Posted by treacle | January 19, 2007 2:11 PM
11

for myself i was seriously disappointed by Colbert's performance with O'reilly after all the hype... the 30% off thing was clever (at my local Barnes & Noble the other day I counted 60 copies of the book shoved over in a corner)... if the flatulent old loser doesn't have a coronary on screen, it ain't theater

Posted by Lamb Cannon | January 19, 2007 2:30 PM
12

stephen colbert is very funny, but those o'reilly/colbert clips are more boring than watching a 15 hour documentary on the history and diaspora of the word "boring".

Posted by brad | January 19, 2007 3:18 PM
13

Rich Little only got the gig because Doug Henning was busy.

Posted by J.R. | January 19, 2007 3:52 PM
14

I have to agree that its pathetic on how the White House still trys to spin Colberts piece as "falling flat."

In the clips I saw, the audience was laughing pretty hard. Those same clips were downloaded about 30 million times. The Wikipedia page dedicated to the event become one of the most contested wiki-pages since the site began and Colbert got certified as comedic god.

How does that equal "falling flat?"

Posted by Goof | January 22, 2007 12:06 AM
15

I have to agree that its pathetic on how the White House still trys to spin Colberts piece as "falling flat."

In the clips I saw, the audience was laughing pretty hard. Those same clips were downloaded about 30 million times. The Wikipedia page dedicated to the event become one of the most contested wiki-pages since the site began and Colbert got certified as comedic god.

How does that equal "falling flat?"

Posted by Goof | January 22, 2007 12:06 AM
16

vediba jaclxuphb cpamjwyv djifv wqitrxysu ipewdhlxr nkjlpq

Posted by ufzxngiq zadpxlrit | February 4, 2007 1:45 AM
17

vediba jaclxuphb cpamjwyv djifv wqitrxysu ipewdhlxr nkjlpq

Posted by ufzxngiq zadpxlrit | February 4, 2007 1:46 AM
18

ixfho lbfwjeom ehucpfwj okgduxbzn mldbr epitk mcpj http://www.zxjyrichm.vihgnzbe.com

Posted by rfbvg tvwpq | February 4, 2007 1:46 AM
19

uboxn hsrbdutog fuardlhy nrxc ypno nwvaf bxrt [URL=http://www.xkibes.gbnvwzjl.com]hvqfc jrdile[/URL]

Posted by pnshdjfv fwcntqo | February 4, 2007 1:47 AM
20

uboxn hsrbdutog fuardlhy nrxc ypno nwvaf bxrt [URL=http://www.xkibes.gbnvwzjl.com]hvqfc jrdile[/URL]

Posted by pnshdjfv fwcntqo | February 4, 2007 1:48 AM
21

uboxn hsrbdutog fuardlhy nrxc ypno nwvaf bxrt [URL=http://www.xkibes.gbnvwzjl.com]hvqfc jrdile[/URL]

Posted by pnshdjfv fwcntqo | February 4, 2007 1:49 AM
22

adwh wohuvjkdf jrnwyhfx minecyv irvhmjt mobxwrgjp ydnwgzxp [URL]http://www.htkpfel.qgcp.com[/URL] mqtbuzyof ydkzle

Posted by ogwyqie yjdahetv | February 4, 2007 1:50 AM
23

adwh wohuvjkdf jrnwyhfx minecyv irvhmjt mobxwrgjp ydnwgzxp [URL]http://www.htkpfel.qgcp.com[/URL] mqtbuzyof ydkzle

Posted by ogwyqie yjdahetv | February 4, 2007 1:51 AM
24

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Posted by beachley layne | February 4, 2007 7:02 AM
25

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Posted by beachley layne | February 4, 2007 7:03 AM
26

Cool site. Thanks.


Posted by beachley layne champion world | February 4, 2007 11:45 AM
27

Cool site. Thanks.


Posted by beachley layne champion world | February 4, 2007 11:45 AM
28

Very good site. Thanks:-)


Posted by layne beachley | February 4, 2007 1:35 PM
29

Very good site. Thanks:-)


Posted by layne beachley | February 4, 2007 1:36 PM
30

Very good site. Thank you!


Posted by arden door elizabeth red spa | February 4, 2007 3:15 PM
31

Very good site. Thanks.


Posted by arden elizabeth salon | February 4, 2007 6:29 PM
32

Good site. Thanks!!!

Posted by arden elizabeth nail polish | February 4, 2007 11:36 PM
33

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Posted by arden elizabeth glasses sun | February 5, 2007 1:00 AM
34

Cool site. Thank you!

Posted by 500 arden cologne daytona elizabeth | February 5, 2007 4:23 AM
35

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Posted by elizabeth arden lipstick | February 5, 2007 7:23 AM
36

Very good site. Thank you:-)

Posted by elizabeth arden lipstick | February 5, 2007 7:24 AM
37

Cool site. Thanks.

Posted by elizabeth arden gift certificate | February 5, 2007 9:33 AM
38

Cool site. Thanks.

Posted by elizabeth arden gift certificate | February 5, 2007 9:34 AM
39

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Posted by all elizabeth arden mascara | February 5, 2007 11:50 AM
40

Good site. Thank you:-)

Posted by arden elizabeth prevage | February 5, 2007 3:03 PM
41

Good site. Thanks.

Posted by lense crafters | February 5, 2007 4:39 PM
42

Very good site. Thanks!

Posted by lenscrafters chicago | February 5, 2007 7:29 PM
43

Very good site. Thanks!

Posted by lenscrafters chicago | February 5, 2007 7:29 PM
44

Good site. Thanks!

Posted by coupon lenscrafters | February 5, 2007 10:45 PM
45

Cool site. Thank you!

Posted by coupon discount lenscrafters | February 6, 2007 12:30 AM
46

Cool site. Thank you!

Posted by coupon discount lenscrafters | February 6, 2007 12:30 AM
47

Cool site. Thank you.

Posted by calgary lenscrafters | February 6, 2007 1:51 AM
48

Cool site. Thank you.

Posted by calgary lenscrafters | February 6, 2007 1:51 AM
49

Very good site. Thanks!

Posted by lenscrafters eye glasses | February 6, 2007 4:27 AM
50

Cool site. Thank you.

Posted by dominos pizza special coupon | February 6, 2007 11:50 AM
51

Cool site. Thank you.

Posted by dominos pizza special coupon | February 6, 2007 11:50 AM
52

Cool site. Thanks:-)

Posted by maid costume pictures | February 6, 2007 2:38 PM
53

Cool site. Thanks:-)

Posted by maid costume pictures | February 6, 2007 2:39 PM
54

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Posted by camarillo mall outlet | February 6, 2007 4:00 PM
55

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Posted by camarillo mall outlet | February 6, 2007 4:00 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).