<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on In/Visible, Art BS, Art Slog</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/invisible_art_bs_art_slog</link>
<description>This week&apos;s art podcast is about—what else?—sculpture, with Eric Fredericksen. You even get a pretty picture of the guy. And Tyler Green is calling BS on Johanna Burton&apos;s proposal (mentioned yesterday on Slog) that the difference between installation and sculpture is that one needs you, while the other doesn&apos;t. He says all art is equally needy--or at least from Henry Moore to Thomas Hirshhorn. But doesn&apos;t some art want you more than other art? Thomas Hirshhorn desperately wants you, it seems to me. Jasper Johns could care less about you. This doesn&apos;t exist? Hey, also, I want to announce: for...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:22:37 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:19:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Tyler Green</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>But I didn't suggest that all art was equally needy. I said I didn't know what the flying fig that ridiculous phrase means. I created no range between Moore and Hirschhorn. The whole conversation is a gigantic waste of time -- the only reason to discuss the pseudo-thoughts of a pseudo-thinker is to expose them. Which is all I was trying to do in my post.</p>]]></description>
<author>Tyler Green</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/invisible_art_bs_art_slog#c592702</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/invisible_art_bs_art_slog#c592702</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:19:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>