<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Gay Legislators to Introduce Gay Marriage Legislation</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i</link>
<description>busy, busy getting tomorrow&apos;s paper out, but here&apos;s an exciting announcement from the five gay legislators in Olympia: Equality for all Washington families OLYMPIA — Democrats from the state Senate and the House of Representatives will unveil two separate legislative proposals designed to provide equality for all Washington families. These include a bill to extend domestic partnership benefits to same sex-couples and a bill to extend marriage equality to same-sex couples. Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, Rep. Joe McDermott, D-West Seattle, Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver, Rep. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, and Rep. Dave Upthegrove, D-Des Moines will introduce the two proposals....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:33:43 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:04:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by elswinger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This will not prevent assholes from proposing and possibly passing a constitutional amendment banning same sex relationships.</p>]]></description>
<author>elswinger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586147</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586147</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:36:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gay Bean Counter</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I count 5 gay legislators...</p>]]></description>
<author>Gay Bean Counter</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586153</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586153</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:40:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Josh Feit</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoops. 5. Thanks. Changed it. </p>]]></description>
<author>Josh Feit</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586164</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586164</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:45:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>At last! Something to be excited about.</p>

<p>Elswinger,</p>

<p>A constitutional amendment to ban marriage equality would have to be introduced and pass both the House and Senate in which the Dems have super-majorities. The Dem leadership has said that any attempt to pass such an amendment is DOA.</p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586222</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586222</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gfish</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yay! If we pass this, god will love us again and all this weird weather will stop!</p>]]></description>
<author>gfish</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586255</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586255</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Coffman</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You think Gregoire would sign it Josh?</p>]]></description>
<author>Dave Coffman</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586271</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586271</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:43:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Only one Senator? Geesh ...</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586318</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586318</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:20:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by blehpunk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>its about fucking time. i want this to pass like in california, and then the governor will have to sign it. she can't really oppose something this big if it is democrat approved in the leg.</p>]]></description>
<author>blehpunk</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586411</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586411</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by aaron jason silver</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                                          Marriage, a religious institution?<br />
	     </p>

<p>     I have difficulty trying to understand why allowing gays to use the term â€śmarriageâ€ť rather than â€śunionsâ€ť to be such a sticking point.  I have heard it often said by people that are opposed to gay marriage; say that marriage is a religious institution.  Or using the term marriage   will somehow make a mockery of traditional marriages. If marriage were indeed a religious institution, why then are heterosexual couples afforded such a wide variety of ways of getting married that have no religious affiliation whatsoever? Heterosexual atheists are allowed to marry and they certainly donâ€™t want any religious overtones to their marriages.  Straight couples can get married by the justice of the piece; they can get married by a ship captain on a cruise ship. They can be married underwater or on a mountaintop, it seems to me it just doesnâ€™t matter and that there are no restrictions.  The list goes on and on therefore, making the argument of about marriage being a religious institution absurd.                                                                                                                  <br />
  <br />
     I have also heard many opponents of gay marriage say that same sex marriage will make a mockery of traditional marriages, meaning I suppose between a man and a woman.  I think that looking closely at all of the statistics about the success of traditional marriages; they seem to be doing a damn good job of their own, making a mockery of the institution of marriage. Then when one looks at the statistics of how many straight lay men and woman who have extramarital affairs doesnâ€™t look so good either not to mention many couples of the clergy who seem also not to have the greatest track record.   So then, what do the opponents of gay marriage really mean by saying that same sex marriages would make a mockery of traditional marriage?  One doesnâ€™t have to be a sociologist or have a degree in statistics to understand that allowing gay marriages to exist would hurt no one. In fact gay marriage would likely cause gays to have longer lasting relationships. There has been a common complaint generally spouted out by the straight population, that gay relationships donâ€™t seem last very long.  Statistics do however bear out one thing in regards to marriage verses just living together as a couple, and that is that couples that are married verses couples just living together, do last longer if they are married. Perhaps this could be the answer in motivating gay couples to work harder at their relationships if they were legally bound by a legitimate contract, rather than just being able to just walk away as so often happens when they hit some rough waters as all relationships do at some point whether gay or straight.   Thank you,   Aaron Jason Silver   Saugatuck, Mi    49408    269 561 6789   www.aaronjasonsilver.com     <br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>aaron jason silver</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586916</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/01/gay_legislators_to_i#c586916</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:04:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>