Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Fun with crime stats

1

We took a different tack with the same numbers. Here's the main report that shows what the PI skipped over -- total crime is actually down vs. 2005. You also look up the specific change for each category of crime in your area of the city.

Posted by j | January 2, 2007 2:36 PM
2

In other news: Ignoring the mass murders, car bombings, and civil war in Iraq, violence is in Baghdad!

Posted by John | January 2, 2007 2:50 PM
3

PI sensationalism is sorta sad these days. I wonder if it actually works to increase circulation.

Posted by wf | January 2, 2007 3:02 PM
4

If you torture them long enough, and hard enough, numbers will confess to anything.

Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me | January 2, 2007 3:37 PM
5

wow. jacksonville had 136 in 2006. ya'll are doing pretty well.

Posted by konstantConsumer | January 2, 2007 3:44 PM
6

Anyone looked at a 100 year graph of the numbers?

Face it, the trend is down - way down.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 2, 2007 3:45 PM
7

The only thing dying is the murder rate. Although I totally disagree with your "well, massacres shouldn't be included in the murder rate" argument. That's pretty lame, as if those people count for nothing?? But I do agree the PI is torturing the numbers to create a story. Fun with statistics!!

Posted by him | January 2, 2007 4:45 PM
8

It's not that massacres shouldn't count, it's that Seattle has a pretty low murder rate anyway. When the murder rate is in the low double digits, a slight uptick in one year doesn't spell disaster, especially when that uptick can be attributed to a single asshole.

Posted by keshmeshi | January 2, 2007 5:14 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).