Politics Dykin’ It Up, Madam President Style!
posted by on January 22 at 17:55 PM
The thing one must understand when discussing Hillary Clinton in any capacity is that she is probably a SECRET DYKE. Now, I am forced to admit, I am notoriously bad at spotting lesbians in general—I grew up in Montana, and all Montanan women are born with shaggy brown mullets and a lip full of SKOAL; ergo my lesbometer lies rather underdeveloped.
However.
A secret source whose word I trust just a little less than God’s (and who boasts a long and celebrated military and political career, I’ll have you know) swears by the divine diapers of little Baby Jesus that the so-called “Clinton marriage” is merely a political device, that Hillary munches carpet like a boll weevil, and that at the Clinton White House? Well, the Secret Service had to sneak Hillary’s secret lesbo lovers in and out of the place, while Bill was busy sampling cigars elsewhere. I don’t KNOW that this is true, of course, and yet still, I somehow choose to really, really believe it. (It explains OH so very too fucking much.) But. Well. I’m notoriously gullible.
Really.
Dyke, dyke, dyke.
So is your 'trusted source' a republican? Because this sounds exactly like something Karl Rove would dream up and spread around...
my dear Cusious....a republican? indeed, no. no, no, no. in fact, the term "very liberal jew" springs to mind. however, i see your point. sorry about that. i retract everything.
I didn't think it was possible for you to be more annoying than you already were. Go away somewhere.
I love Adrian! Don't leave us, Mr. Ryan. Skip his posts, Mr. Mitchell, if they annoy you so much. It's not hard to do. I've been skipping Mr. Mudede's since this blog was born.
Name your source or shut the fuck up. Let me guess, to you, every woman in a position power, who doesn't dress like a stripper must be a closet lesbian. Unless she is overty sexy, in which case, she must've whored her way up the ladder. This is classic sexism - attacking powerful women's sexuality as a way to drag them down.
As a woman who verges on ECB-style feminism, I've always gotten the lesbian vibe from Hillary too. So I don't think it's necessarily The Man trying to tear her down.
I don't have any secret source to back it up, just (as Mr. Colbert would say) my gut.
wasn't this actually the expose du jour of the National Enquirer or World News Whatever a few years back?
Let's just hope that H.C. doesn't get taken down by another "little blue dress".
Maybe she should play this song at all her campaign stops to hold off suspicion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MRWqlf_8M8&eurl=
Ha. Marry me, Mark Mitchell.
I don't often get Mr. Mudude's posts, but I generally assume that's
because he's smarter than me and he's referencing something with which I am not
familiar. His more confusing posts are usually titled in such a manner that I
expect from them only some vague (to me) musing about something I may not even
recognize, and they're often categorized under "Arts" or "Music", so I'm not
looking to them for news.
I have difficulty gleaning meaning from Mr. Ryan's posts, and I think it's not
because of my educational lacking but because he blogs like a gossip columnist
writes, so there's a lot of extra fluff to sort through. This catches me
off-guard because I'm accustomed to Slog posts that read pretty much like I
imagine the writer speaks. I've only met a few Sloggers in person, so I can't
verify this in most cases, but it's definitely the feeling I get. I hope that
Mr. Ryan will find his real voice for Slog, and not be offended by my saying so
if this happens to be his real voice. I also hope that random bullshit about
his best friend's sister's guesses about legislators' sexual orientation is
categorized uner "I saw U" instead of "Politics" from now on.
It's a shame there weren't blogs back in 1992, because -- well, no, this would have been a pathetic, wanting-to-be-snide-but-failing comment then too.
Personally, I hate second-guessing any relationship, let alone a prominent political marriage.
FDR & Eleanor, JFK & Jackie - probably even George & Martha had their secrets, and their reasons for being together. Secrets and reasons that we have no inkling of. That's appropriate, because it's none of our business. We hate the political class intruding on our relationships, why should we intrude on theirs?
I don't care if Hillary is a lesbian. Just as I don't care if Bill got a blowjob. It's as tacky of a conversation as anything the Lewinsky/Goldberg/Tripp conspiracy every conjured up.
Darling Adrian - Stick to the real celeberities, won't you?
Adrian, you make me rock hard, baby.
adrian, i love you.
and the folks at the Stranger wonder why the rag is not taken seriously
the right wing has invested great effort to taint the Clintons, weekly rumors of the lurking lesbian affairs of Ms. Clinton would be standard fare scandal monger fare
of course, they offered bullets to Dr. King and two Kennedys
death by media lynching is more standard in the 1990's - and the Stranger just joined the gang
Adrain, you silly drunken crack head twit - this sfuff is so old and so hack - secret source - jeez - it has been printed on hundreds of right wing blogs and in the scandal sheet monthly for ten years ... what a secret source you have
trash beyond trash, and very homophobic, duh, playing the right wing's game for them
duh - and some blog will now quote the impeccable sources at the fag driven Stranger
hey faggot, wake up
does the secret source remember the right wing rumor that Mrs. Clinton was fucking close friend Vince Foster (not very lesbian) and somehow had to have him killed
Adrian, seriously, this is such crazed drivel
the only truth is -- admit it, in your conversations about the secret service guys, you and you buddy would enjoy fucking and sucking them all in a giant White house pig pile - at least, so the rumor goes ....
Whoa. Devo.
Oh Adrian, my love, it would appear that you have spoken ill of a Sacred Cow. Surely your penance must be awful. The vengeful wrath of ECB and Chuckles Mededededede will without doubt fall on you for this blasphemy.
Ardrian's pittance/pennace is his trival career as a writer - god folks, this is so, so below second rate
"a Sacred Cow" - how quaint. Lots of Montana rubes here at slow day slog
And more than a few sexist shit heads, fag or not.
Ever met Senator Clinton/the Former First Lady, Kate? Or is the gut feeling based solely on her public interviews? In which case, make it clear that your feeling is based on absolutely nothing and you have no proof or substantiation whatsoever. Meanwhile, Adrian, and you, should lay off the character assassination.
Adrian -- how many peoples' pants have you peed in this town? Oh, the outrage. They're lining up here, pretending they never met you on that one night every six to eight months that they stay out till past last call, forget how they got home, and have to use a sick day on the second day of the two-day hangover. Damn you, rapscallion.
I just find it fascinating that “pro gay” Leftists assume that all speculation regarding sexuality is by its nature a slur against its subject. Such internalized homophobia is a disturbing sign of a deeper sickness in the Liberal community. Remember, these are the same people who tried to exploit Mary Cheny’s sexuality for political purposes. In fact, strangely enough, nearly all of the most recent political hit jobs on gays have come from the “pro gay” left. I find it hard to believe that a party that is willing to exploit homophobia on an individual level is telling me the truth when they say they support gay rights. At least the right is honest about their disdain for gay people.
sigh...i love the idea of 'adrian ryan' but the excecution of the idea just doesn't work for me...it's just not that funny...or original...
it's kind of like the 'strangers with candy' movie from last year...it should have been funny; it could have been funny; but...it wasn't funny...
Dewsterling: As I (thought I) made clear in my post, I have no sources to back it up. It's a vibe. I really don't give a damn if she is a lesbian.
Stating my opinion about whether or not Hillary likes women is not character assassination.
Saying that I heard from a person who heard from a friend that she molests kittens, would be.
Kate:
Defending Adrian's post by saying that you also think that she is a lesbian is lending validation to an otherwise unvalidated assertion. Because you feel she is a lesbian, it must be okay to call her one in print, right? You think it, too, so there must be some truth to the accusation.
Saying that a person's is gay when they are in a heterosexual marriage is, in effect, calling them an adulteror and a liar. That is character assassination.
Furthermore, none of the male candidates' sexuality has been called into question (though a question was once posited about one of Obama's suits). Your contributors aren't inquiring about the sexual practises of McCain or Obama and their wives. Do they [munch] carpet like a boll weevil? Does it matter? Yet Senator Clinton doesn't deserve the same respect. Why?
for Sir - you - gotta -
Such silly blather - so as a community we are supposed to applaud the right wing because some liberals don't score 100 per cent???
Foolish thinking.
The right wing scores 0 per cent.... few choices in life, and esp. politics are of perfect and only slightly less than perfect.
Get a clue.
Those right wingers you admire for their honesty would lock you up in a camp and use electricity on your dick to change you if they could.
Say a prayer of thanks to the imperfect liberals.
Go, Clinton - Obama, what a ticket.
Yeah, I see your point. I mean, last time we went with a Clinton at least we got Don't Ask Don't Tell and DOMA!
hspivmaxn zdgrfwiq bhjmyxtzg oshzrive bhqdxwke bjfwnze rgkwazcq
hspivmaxn zdgrfwiq bhjmyxtzg oshzrive bhqdxwke bjfwnze rgkwazcq
hspivmaxn zdgrfwiq bhjmyxtzg oshzrive bhqdxwke bjfwnze rgkwazcq
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).