Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Celebrity Patents | Pedersen Clarifies »

Friday, January 5, 2007

Dead Wrong

posted by on January 5 at 16:24 PM

The NYT ran a terrific opinion piece this week about how the White House Drug Czar ignored an alarming spike in drug-induced fatalities last year, and instead gave himself a pat on the back for a marginal decline in teen drug use. Even worse, we’ve been addressing drug problems by focusing on the wrong people.

Few experts would have suspected that the biggest contributors to California’s drug abuse, death and injury toll are educated, middle-aged women living in the Central Valley and rural areas, while the fastest-declining, lowest-risk populations are urban black and Latino teenagers. Yet the index found exactly that. These are the sorts of trends we need to understand if we are to design effective policies.

The United States’ drug abuse crisis has exploded out of control. Scientifically designed strategies are urgently needed to target the manifest drug-caused damage that current policies are failing miserably to address.

And that was the end of the article. Without explaining what “effective policies” would look like, the conclusion falls somewhat flat.

If the government responds by spending more money only to locate the source of drug problems, it will simply add another line item to the budget of an already-overblown drug war that does little to mitigate drug abuse, but perpetuates repression of poor minorities.

Instead the government needs to fund programs that provide accurate drug-abuse information and treatment-on-demand in key communities (in this case, California’s rural and suburban women), and stop emphasizing the arrest, prosecution and incarceration young people-of-color in the inner city.

RSS icon Comments

1

Well said, Dominic. Unfortunately, the major media play along with the drug war far too often. In my opinion, they do it as a sort of trade-off for information. They don't attack the drug war because it angers police and prosecutors (ill-informed ones, anyway) who are seeing astronomical profits from the drug war and who do childish things like not returning phone calls, favoring one media outlet over another and denying access to public records whenever someone steps on their toes. It's no surprise to see the authorities act childish when someone threatens their golden goose, but it's sadder to see the media playing along (and becoming complicit) in a human rights travesty. I used to really believe in newspapers, but I've lost faith in the majors over the drug war. Look what the Los Angeles Times did to Gary Webb. They hung him out on a limb. Fortunately there's Dan Savage, who pulls no punches, and there are a few people like you. You are a drug-war-fighting son of a gun. It's good to read you on Slog. Together we will end the war on drugs, which hangs around like old dead Nixon's old rank fart, stinking up this, the future.

Posted by brentandrews | January 5, 2007 6:16 PM
2

Hmmm...guess I better stop watching Weeds while I'm still ahead, huh?

Posted by JAM | January 5, 2007 8:19 PM
3

Have heard the drug war called many things, but a Nixon fart, that's a new one. Let's just hope that this, too, shall pass.

Posted by Ronald Holden | January 5, 2007 9:17 PM
4

I wonder how many of those middle-aged women have sons and daughters fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'd get waisted too.

Posted by elswinger | January 6, 2007 12:15 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).