Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Cuckolding Confusion

1

Nice job, Satadru. It takes a history teacher to make kinky sex boring and pedantic.

Posted by J.R. | January 15, 2007 5:00 PM
2

I don't think that either the question OR your answer were racist, Dan. Webster defines racism as, "1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race; 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination." How was CUCK's fantasy fit within that definition?

You have often (correctly) criticized people for using the word "rape" to describe situations that are not, by definition, really rape. Using the word carelessly to describe anything less is offensive and irresponsible to people who have survived real rape.

I would argue this situation is similar. CUCK's fantasy might offend some people, but just because he's turned on by the idea of having somebody of another race involved in his encounter doesn't make it racist. He isn't saying that he believes that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities, or that racial differences produce an inherent superiority. Nor does his fantasy involved prejudice or discrimination toward the black man.

I understand that many people won't be turned on by CUCK's fantasy (indeed, many will be turned off), and some people will certainly be offended by it. But I don't think it's accurate to call him, or you, racist.

I know there are people into BDSM who are also turned on by the idea of either being dominated by, or submitting to, somebody of another race. Is that also racist? Is it is wrong for anybody to engage in ANY sexual encounter with a partner of another race, if the racial difference is in any way a turn on for either participant? What... should we all claim to be color blind when it comes to our fantasies and turn ons? Deny that race ever plays a factor in our attractions and fantasies? Frankly I think that's even more offensive than openly admitting what's going on inside our kinky heads.

I agree that this is about consent. If CUCK and his wife are both turned on by this idea, and they can find a black man who's turned on by it too, and all three are willing participants in a scene that they all enjoy, then end of story. No racism here. Just good clean consensual fun.

Posted by oh come on | January 15, 2007 5:03 PM
3

Just as it's not anti-feminist or mysogynistic (sp?) for a lovingly sadistic man to beat the bejeezus out of a willing woman, it's not racist for a consenting threesome of a white man, a black man, and a white woman to have sex in whatever combination and for whatever consensual reasons they want.

Posted by L | January 15, 2007 9:18 PM
4

Isee a new column--Fuck an Uptight Seattleite....

Posted by NapoleonXIV | January 16, 2007 9:44 AM
5

"At least in some situations, the white man who fantasizes/worries about “his” woman being fucked/raped by black men is actually transfering to the white woman his own unacknowledged lust for black men. The giant glistening black cocks are for him, not her."

The subdued racism of cuckold fantasies aside for a moment, does anyone honestly actually believe shit like this? Or is it just put out there to fill pages in masters' theses?

Posted by tsm | January 16, 2007 1:57 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).