Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Nicole Richie's DUI | Mel Gibson is Nutballs »

Monday, December 11, 2006

What He Said

posted by on December 11 at 16:23 PM

From Atrios:

Look, it’s very simple. There are two Christmas holidays. One is the secular holiday, decreed by the federal government to be a national holiday, which is celebrated and marked with festive displays of trees, lights, fat guys with beards, and elves, along with lots of shopping and the giving of gifts. The other holiday involves a celebration of the birth of the Messiah, and is celebrated with religious rituals and displays of nativity scenes and other religious imagery.

Public displays of secular Christmas imagery? Fine.

Public displays of religious Christmas imagery? Less fine.

Christmas trees in airports? Fine.

Baby Jesus scenes in airports? Less fine.

Oh, and for the record…

I dashed off a quick post about this dumbfuck controversy this morning at Sea-Tac—half asleep, on my way to a plane—just to reemphasize the point I made yesterday: It wasn’t the dreaded secular humanists that got the freaking “holiday trees” yanked from Sea-Tac Airport. It was a religious person—what religion? who cares?—that complained about them, which prompted the Port of Seattle to yank ‘em. Does it matter that this religious person—a rabbi—just wanted to get a Menorah added to the festive clutter? And that he didn’t necessarily want the Christmas trees removed? Even if he threatened to sue if he didn’t get his way?

Sure, yeah, whatever. But so what?

RSS icon Comments

1

Why do you hate America, Dan?!!!

Posted by Tiffany | December 11, 2006 4:43 PM
2

Well, not to speak for Dan but if I had to guess I'd say he loves America very much which is why he gets so frustrated with the self-centered religious asshats that think theirs is the only view that matters and pushes that view on every other person within spitting distance.

This post seemed more like a rant against religion than against America and the whole argument is that the two aren't (and should never be) mutually exclusive.

BUT like I said, I'm just guessing.

Posted by monkey | December 11, 2006 5:08 PM
3

I was just being sarcastic.

Posted by Tiffany | December 11, 2006 5:19 PM
4

airports without christmas trees? also fine.

Posted by josh | December 11, 2006 5:27 PM
5

This allows me to draw my own conculsion. Maybee that is why Sea-tac aiport did not want to display the Manorah. Which is a scene of religious imagery. I'm just drawing an idea. Something to think about.

Posted by keya | December 11, 2006 5:28 PM
6

I object to all the red and green Christmas lights strung over traffic intersections. Turn them off right now!

Posted by Creek | December 11, 2006 5:38 PM
7

christmas trees without airports... also fine

Posted by Dave Coffman | December 11, 2006 6:07 PM
8

christmas without air? also fine.

Posted by Sean | December 11, 2006 6:11 PM
9

Tiffany, I forgot what site I was on for a second.

Dammit Dan, why do you hate America so much?

Posted by monkey | December 11, 2006 6:41 PM
10

I don't hate America. America hates me.

Posted by Dan Savage | December 11, 2006 7:49 PM
11

American oughta blame you: http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=12237

Nice. But as you say--sure, yeah, whatever.

Posted by RadMan | December 11, 2006 10:22 PM
12

Just put up a Hanukkah tree. Add a Kwanzaa tree, a Buddah tree, a Wiccan tree, and any others requested. Trees are generic symbols of life, the more the merrier. Just require that they bear no religious symbols, as Christmas trees generally do not. Usually they're decorated with candy canes, ribbons, miniature toys, etc.

Posted by cat | December 12, 2006 8:45 AM
13

jonny626

Posted by jonny520 | December 12, 2006 10:03 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).