Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The Opposite of a Four-Foot Rule

1

As if lutefisk wasn’t already enough. Damn.

Posted by BB | December 8, 2006 3:16 PM
2
Posted by Brian | December 8, 2006 3:31 PM
3
Posted by monkey | December 8, 2006 3:36 PM
4

Does that mean lap dances are free the first Thursday of every month?

Posted by him | December 8, 2006 3:43 PM
5

But how many artists treat their craft as their primary income? And how much expression is really inherent in stripping? What is the message involved in stipping? That female bodies are for sale? I used to be a stripper, and I loved the experience, but I'm not sure stripping is really art. Even if paint weren't commissioned, it would still end up on a canvas. If words weren’t paid per unit, people would still write. If stripping weren't an economically fuled activity, I’m not sure quite as many dudes would receive lap dances, you know, just out of a ladies’ need to articulate her sexual self. If stripping were treated as a legitimate job, with legitimate regulations and worker protections, now that might be something.

Posted by alisa | December 8, 2006 11:15 PM
6

But how many artists treat their craft as their primary income? And how much expression is really inherent in stripping? What is the message involved in stipping? That female bodies are for sale? I used to be a stripper, and I loved the experience, but I'm not sure stripping is really art. Even if paint weren't commissioned, it would still end up on a canvas. If words weren’t paid per unit, people would still write. If stripping weren't an economically fuled activity, I’m not sure quite as many dudes would receive lap dances, you know, just out of a ladies’ need to articulate her sexual self. If stripping were treated as a legitimate job, with legitimate regulations and worker protections, now that might be something.

Posted by alisa | December 8, 2006 11:16 PM
7

I didn't mean to post twice, but I recived this:

"In an effort to curb malicious comment posting by abusive users, I've enabled a feature that requires a weblog commenter to wait a short amount of time before being able to post again. Please try to post your comment again in a short while. Thanks for your patience."

After my first attempt. Too long? Now I feel sheepish....

Posted by alisa | December 8, 2006 11:18 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).