Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Eastside Refugees seek 4-star shelter

1

Our house is full of refugees, and we're doing pretty well - blitz spirit and all that. We've had a few people stop over to use warm water for showers.

Being without money for a hotel or people in powered areas you can stay with must suck utterly.

Posted by Art | December 17, 2006 10:32 AM
2

But oddly, there are only 2 unofficial shelters open on the eastside, both in bellevue. We just got power back at my place in Kirkland last night. It was 42 inside, so we've been staying with generous friends in Seattle. If we were still dead this morning, we were hoping to hit one of the shelters. I guess people have been using hotels, instead.

Posted by meggo | December 17, 2006 10:49 AM
3

Seattle Public Light are listing a few more shelters.

Posted by Art | December 17, 2006 11:14 AM
4

Nothing can make me hate these people more than the comment, "It's like a rich person's Superdome."

Posted by Gitai | December 17, 2006 12:14 PM
5

I was waiting for this.

“We just want to go home,” Eastern tells me, “the quarters are really cramped here; the hotel is packed. It’s really easy to take your house for granted until you don’t have it anymore.”

Cry me a river. You're rich enough to afford the Sheraton. I don't really care if staying there puts you in any sort of discomfort.

Posted by Gomez | December 17, 2006 4:22 PM
6

Whatever, at least they're sorting it out amongst themselves and injecting some money into the hopitality industry while their at it.

Posted by Dougsf | December 17, 2006 4:32 PM
7

My self-righteous-bullshit-detector just exploded!

Posted by The Baron | December 17, 2006 5:07 PM
8

I love the snobby comments about the horrible rich eastsiders people from a bunch of Seattle yuppies living in Ballard, Wallingford, Fremont, Queen Anne, etc.

Trust me, if those parts of Seattle were without power we would have seen the same mass exodus to downtown hotels. Let's stop pretending that a neighborhood where a starter home is $400K is anything but rich, no matter what side of the lake it's on.

Posted by bobjones | December 17, 2006 6:21 PM
9

Oh, whatever, like half of us can even afford Motel 6. I'd wrap up in blankets and wait for the power to come back.

That said, I understand how fortunate I am to live in a neighborhood with strong enough infrastructure that the power rarely goes out.

Posted by Gomez | December 17, 2006 6:49 PM
10

Oh, whatever, like half of us can even afford Motel 6.

Your parents, who you live with, most likely could.

Posted by The Baron | December 17, 2006 8:53 PM
11

Nice try, dumbass. My parents live in Las Vegas.

Posted by Gomez | December 17, 2006 10:48 PM
12

They're staying in our hotels and probably shopping in our shops, too — say hello to the tax dollars.

Posted by beneluxboy | December 17, 2006 11:08 PM
13

They're staying in our hotels and probably shopping in our shops, too — say hello to the tax dollars.

Posted by beneluxboy | December 17, 2006 11:09 PM
14


This post seems really strange in its tone. It's as if there's some assumption that all the people on the Eastside are rich, Beverly Hills snobs with little dogs and idle hands. The Eastside is horrible in innumerable ways, but it's not all wealthy, not even close. (By the way, the average income in that chi-chi suburb Lakewood is $36,000. Seattle is around $72,000.) The key difference is that most Eastsiders own their own homes. That might make them middle class, but not "rich". (Medina, Clyde Hill, rich? Yes. Factoria? Juanita? Duvall? Totem Lake? Eastgate? Not by Seattle standards.)

Secondly, did Qwest Field really offer to be a shelter? I didn't hear that they did. I wouldn't call having to stay in a hotel as result of massive flooding as a "weekend getaway". Just because they're staying in a hotel, doesn't mean they can necessarily afford it.

Lastly: "well bred dogs on designer leashes". Did you know for sure they were "designer"? Did you ask the dog-owners about the breeding of their dogs? Glib lines like this drive me insane.

From the tone of this article (and especially the tone of the comments), people whose homes are either uninhabitable or too cold for sleeping in (it's 32 degrees right now) shouldn't be staying at a hotel. They should burden any friends or relatives (if they have them) with their families (and pets), sleep on the street, or stay in a freezing house that has no electricity (and probably not enough blankets). Otherwise, they're insufferable, rich, and horrible people. That's nuts.

Yes, Eastsiders can be myopic and insufferable, but they shouldn't made out as villians for staying in a hotel during a natural disaster.

Posted by lame | December 18, 2006 1:30 AM
15

I think the worst assumption is that either the Westin or Sheraton are "upscale". The Westin has been reduced to the level of a really nice Holiday Inn, and the Sheraton is just a dump. No amount of icing can help that turd.

Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay | December 18, 2006 8:57 AM
16

This post lost all its credibility when the first "Eastside refugee" it quotes is from that upscale bastion of the rich, Lakewood.

Smarmy, cheap shots from Seattle hipster wannabes gets old real fast.

Posted by BobH | December 18, 2006 9:54 AM
17

I'm thinking this is a spoof - not a great one, since hardly anybody realized it.

We spent a night at a hotel, and felt pretty damn lucky that we were able to do it - last night we were back home, with the temperature 39 degrees (in the house). God only knows when our (non-rich) part of Bellevue is going to see any power. Fortunately, we have no trees through our roof, so we can't complain!

Posted by hikitty | December 18, 2006 10:14 AM
18

I thought this post was hilarious. Thank you, Cienna, for yet another example of your wit and humor.

Posted by keshmeshi | December 18, 2006 11:56 AM
19

"Knee-Jerk Liberal Reaction"? No, it doesn't make any difference how hard you try; you can't blame the slow recovery from the storm and the power outage on the conservative fat-cats. This is a liberal Washington State problem; you are on your own. It is ironic that the only hope you have is the redneck, male, chauvinist, conservative pig in rubber boots who is busting his hind-sides to restore power to the city that is full of whining rich liberals (with "Impeach Bush" bumper stickers on their SUVs and Volvos) huddling around scented candles… So why shouldn't Bush blink? Not even the sooo coveted Global Warming will help you in your cold, dark and lonely nights.

Posted by George | December 21, 2006 1:25 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).