<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on And the Non-Impact of the Democrats</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1</link>
<description>The top agenda items in Olympia for Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske are closing the gun-show loophole and renewing the assault-weapons ban. This hardly constitutes a move to nullify the Second Amendment, but rather it&apos;s tailored legislation to make our city streets and our cops safer. Well, the city is complaining that despite the Democrats&apos; new 62-36 advantage in the house (a mandate if there ever was one) Speaker of the House Frank Chopp (D-43, Capitol Hill, U-District, Wallingford) is shy about moving forward on those two issues now. I asked Representative Chopp about this yesterday. Here&apos;s what he said:...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:04:20 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:16:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by elswinger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Couldn't we have a city or county ordinance regarding guns.  If I still lived in the stick I with have kept my Winchester and Colt .22 pistol for plinking.  I just don't have need for a gun in the city unless I plan on shooting myself.</p>]]></description>
<author>elswinger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556710</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556710</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:31:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Much ado about nothing - this will all go smoothly in the end.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556774</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556774</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:42:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by But Frank</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Closing the gun show loophole has nothing to do with whether anyone "oughta have a right to a gun."  It merely prevents me from exercising my right to buy a gun in a way that's completely untraceable and unaccountable.</p>]]></description>
<author>But Frank</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556809</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556809</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:48:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. X</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>But pursuing gun control could well turn some of those emerging blue counties red again in the next election (think South Snohomish/North Pierce/Spokane/etc) - make no mistake about it.  </p>

<p>Frank is not wrong on this one.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. X</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556812</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556812</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:50:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Danny D.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This specific issue is secondary to the underlying problem: Frank Chopp is a spineless wimp.</p>

<p>He's a pathetic leader for the Dems and an embarrassment to his district. What's the value of charisma, institutional knowledge, and bi-partisan savvy if you never make a touchdown for your own team?</p>

<p>"When I’m trying to get a political agenda done, which is very progressive, I need to have a unified caucus."</p>

<p>Very progressive...? I can't think of many progressive bills that Frank hasn't personally sought to quash, in the name of helping his own party, of course.</p>

<p>Right now it just looks like he is playing king of the hill with his base and hoping the GOP doesn't catch a peek. The 45th district and The Stranger ought to mobilize Frank’s ass out of the legislature and back to Tully’s, the only place he gets anything done.</p>

<p>PS – I wouldn’t normally criticize my own, but, the point is, with a 62-36 advantage we can’t lose. So grow a set, Frank!</p>]]></description>
<author>Danny D.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556846</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556846</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Danny D.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>43rd Dirstict, my typo.</p>]]></description>
<author>Danny D.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556850</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556850</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:06:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Josh Feit</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr. X,<br />
I understand Chopp's POV on this, and over-the-top gun control isn't a big issue for me. But these measures don't jar the 2nd Amendment and are serious issues for the SPD. </p>

<p>Seattle (and Seattle money) is a big reason the Democrats have such a big majority in Olympia. Kerlilowske and Seattle deserve respect on this. </p>]]></description>
<author>Josh Feit</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556852</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556852</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello?</p>

<p>What about marriage equality or civil unions?</p>

<p>My would-be hubby is gonna be sweatin'. </p>

<p>We've been together since college and it's time to make it legal.</p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556857</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556857</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:17:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gomez</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So I guess pedestrian safety isn't as high on his list and the City said it would be, huh?</p>]]></description>
<author>Gomez</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556874</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556874</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:07:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Whacky</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll translate Chopp for you, Josh:<br />
"No."</p>]]></description>
<author>Whacky</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556884</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c556884</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:49:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mrobvious</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone honestly believe either will make any difference in the crime rate?  As if someone who wants a gun and find they can't at a gun show won't go out on the street and get one within an hour?  Or that "assault weapons" (the word has no real meaning) are responsible for more than a tiny fraction of 1% of gun crimes.  I say that as a non-gun-owner who is not fond of guns. </p>

<p>But this is simply for political show purposes, to demonstrate you're on the right side of the issue, even though the issue is of no real importance.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mrobvious</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c558025</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c558025</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:21:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cascadian</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I want the Legislature to focus on anything but this. Gun control--even the more sensible proposals--is a losing issue that won't change a damn thing if it passes except losing votes to the Republicans.</p>]]></description>
<author>Cascadian</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c558473</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c558473</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:11:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by uf911</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Rep. Chopp is taking a pragmatic approach towards focusing on a specific legislative agenda, and he's even willing to go on the record about it. Kudos for honesty.</p>

<p>I've had a concealed carry permit for over a year, but haven't had a gun small enough to actually carry downtown. I'm interested in buying a small-ish pistol, but didn't realize we have a lenient gun show background verfication regime. Thanks, Stranger, for the heads up - I'll have to check out the local gun show scene.</p>

<p>j</p>]]></description>
<author>uf911</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c575254</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/12/and_the_nonimpact_of_1#c575254</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>