The "blue line" network is total crap, having ridden on a fair number of them. Nothing like being run off the road of a city designated bike route.
And I have to tell you, a good number of the "red dashed" routes here lack a true bike lane. Think of Pike with those lame "Sharrows" rather than a true striped lane. Or the University bridge's bike lanes that abruptly stop at merging zones. I guess bicycle commuters are expected to levitate the rest of the way...
You're right, we should take a cue from New Yorkers and take ownership of this issue. Join a group. Get involved. Be part of the solution.
Seattle is preparing a Bike Master Plan that will sketch out which bike improvements are needed over the next 20 years (divided into short, medium, and long term phases). The first draft maps will be unveiled at two meetings in early December.
Put the brother's cranium back together. Chicago has NYC beat also, in part by recognizing different levels of bike usage:
1)off-road paths, like the Lakefront path (shared with pedestrians, rollerbladers etc)
2)bike-only lanes striped onto streets
3)shared use lanes, signed on the street
4)suggested bike routes, which sometimes include bike lanes, and other times are just side streets or arterials with lots of bike traffic. these routes are clearly signed (ie, To Lakefront or To Loop, or, my favorite on Archer Avenue at California, To County Jail).
See this page from the City's own bike website:
Any city should be able to do #4 very easily, at minimal cost. And you've got to start somewhere. . .
I wish Mayor McCheese would stop the lip-service and actually try to ride a bike in this town.
I forgot to say that the city's consultants will be accepting feedback and recommendations from the public at those Bike Master Plan meetings.
Did you actually read the New Yorker article? It wasn't about how a heroic group of bicycle freedom-fighters made New York a better place. It was about what a bunch of ridiculous, squabling, narcissistic, hypocrites all the people active in this "debate" are.
I've been in Manhattan for almost 6 years, and only this summer did I brave purchasing a bike. I've been very pleasantly surprised with the riches offered to the two-wheeling NY'ers. Several times, my friends and I have loaded our bikes on the subway and ridden to the end of the line in Far Rockaway or Coney Island, then ridden back into the city. Thrillseekers: I suggest trying the Queensborough Bridge bike bath. The speed you reach on the downslope into Long Island City is a trip!
I'm not even a biker--in fact I don't know how to ride a bike, but I would love to see bike lanes on every road. As a driver, it would be easier to drive knowing that the bikers had adequate room, thereby reducing my fear that I might inadvertently hit one of them.
I admit the network NYC's sporting here looks absolutely spectacular, but again, isn't NYC predominately navigated by Subway and walking anyway?
Right on Nice Driver @ 8. I commute by bicycle daily AND drive occasionally and I cannot second this comment enough. Bicycle lanes are nearly as positive for drivers as cyclists.
In my first NYC apartment my roommate was a crazed white girl bike messenger who would every day ride her messengering bike from 187th Street where we lived to her downtown office, ride messenges all day, ride back in the evening, strip naked, and ride her track bike on rollers in the highway at ultra-high speed for an hour with Madonna playing so loud on her headphones you could sing along. You couldn't see for the cloud of steam she gave off. She also had a mentally ill German Shepard who would stand in the hall with her and bark furiously (and bit the motherfucking hell out of your shoes if you tried to leave the apartment).
New York's a great city to bike in, though. Grids, baby.
Ok, you have to admit that's not entirely fair, as the two maps are shown at somewhat different scales, the Manhattan map showing a larger area than the Seattle map.
But all in all, yes, a striking illustration of this town's inability to live up to its rhetoric on bike friendliness.
Yeah, I read the article. I think whether the scene in NY is "ridiculous, squabling, narcissistic, hypocrit[ical]" or , say, vital, depends on your point of view. Why are you so down on them? What's your beef?
@ David Wright: Yes, that's why I called the article "fantastic and very funny." Advocacy groups being made up of possessed, self-righteous people is old news, but McGrath does a great job of illustrating the weirdness of this particular group of advocates—-along with the sensibility of some of their complaints, and the near-futility of others.
@12 is wrong, I believe. Central Park is 2.5 miles long, so that's about a 5 mile north/south image of Manhattan in photo #1. The similar image of Seattle shows Volunteer Park to Boeing Field. That's about 5 miles as well, maybe further.
I appreciate all the local advocacy groups do for bicycle commuters. I'm just not sure how effective they are going to be.
Honestly, I think most of the groups should take a more combative tone with the city. Things like the "bicycle master plan" seem like circular files, with no real funding or political will behind them. Just a way to corral and quiet the advocacy groups without really delivering anything.
Why didn't any groups call bullshit on the "Proposition 1 is for more better bicycling" propaganda? The non-roadway funding was a pittance, and the city has never shown an interest in integrating cyclists concerns. Look at the recent repaving and striping of the University Bridge for a classic example.
Start fighting. Start getting confrontational, and I'll give some time.
SEATTLE FUCKING SUCKS TO BIKE IN! I was hit three times when I lived there (in 2.5 years) though the drivers who hit me weren't going more than 5 mph when they hit me because they were just not looking forward when they were driving. I can't believe for a minute that Seattle would even try to label itself as bike-friendly. I'm sorry, but 1 in 20 roads (or less!) that have bike lanes? Fuck that, and the chemical burns you get from all the cars on pike/pine? Not worth it. Face it, Seattle, you like to kill bikers.
In answer to your question about Prop 1, take a look at our page on the issue. The City Council was responsive to our needs as they crafted the measure. Bike and ped projects received a generous percentage of the funding. It also ties in with our push for a Complete Streets ordinance and the Bike Master Plan.
New York isn't bad, and Boston can be a pretty good city to bike around, too. I have to say, though, that one advantage that New York has for bikers is that it's (mostly) flat.
As far as I know, the only major bridge in NYC that doesn't have a bike like is the Verrazano Narrows, and that's a car-only bridge (except for the first Sunday in November).
Having said all that, NYC is still far, far behind European cities when it comes to integrating bikes in to city transportation.
Can you see this. Do not hesitate to choose. Look
Hi guys its me again. Can you look
Please do not hesitate to choose. This
It is very important for you to click below. Trust me
Och beautifull site below too
Be so kind and click
Do not be angry please
I am looking for better life
Nice but this too
Check this places please.
Dont be angry please
Sorry for that.
If you have a minute check this.
Please dont be angry
Sorry for this
Nice but look below
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).