Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Burner-Reichert: It's Over

1

The P-I is running an AP story declaring Reichert the winner.

Posted by It's over(?) | November 13, 2006 8:06 PM
2


Um, why did you put it this way:

"Is Burner’s phone call going to be the traditional concession call from the loser to the victor?"

I don't understand why this question was posed this way. Why wouldn't Darcy call Reichert to concede if she doesn't have the votes to win? Is there something loser-y about that? Is she supposed to sit in her room and pout? That would be a loser thing to do.

I think a better way to put that is:

"Is Burner calling Reichert to concede the election?"

Posted by what? | November 13, 2006 8:14 PM
3

i'm with what? above. what other sort of call would she be making? is she refusing to concede? i certainly hope not.

it's disappointing that she lost but it's clearly over.

Posted by kerri harrop | November 13, 2006 8:18 PM
4

god dammit.

Posted by catnextdoor | November 13, 2006 8:41 PM
5

Praise the Lord!!

Posted by Sanity | November 13, 2006 9:27 PM
6

Stupid Eastsiders. There will be no lamer duck than Sheriff Hairdo. Enjoy the Sonics.

Posted by DOUG. | November 13, 2006 10:04 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).