<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Seattle Times: No Boners, Please, We&apos;re Skittish</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon</link>
<description>The Seattle Times is on a roll: They&apos;ve endorsed Reichert, McMorris, McGavick, and Johnson. And today they urged readers to vote &quot;Yes&quot; on the ridiculous &quot;four foot rule,&quot; which will make Seattle a lap-dance-free zone. Their four-foot-rule endorsement is, at least, a touch more honest than their &quot;Golly! We just like Mike!&quot; McGavick endorsement. They refuse to admit the real reason they endorsed McGavick—and Reichert and McMorris, for that matter: Frank wants his estate tax cut. Period. But they do admit to wanting their real reason for backing the four-foot rule: They want to shut down Seattle&apos;s strip clubs: Something...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:11:30 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:46:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't know what exactly the staff at the Times is getting out of these insane endorsements, but their credibility is now zero.</p>

<p>They don't even read their own damn paper.</p>

<p>Frak them!</p>]]></description>
<author>Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482593</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482593</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:25:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Levislade</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm pretty sure the P-I endorsed this as well.</p>]]></description>
<author>Levislade</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482600</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482600</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by makarune</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>They endorsed MCMORRIS?!?!?!?! Are you kidding me??</p>]]></description>
<author>makarune</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482611</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482611</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:49:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by charles</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I've got a raging clue.</p>]]></description>
<author>charles</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482616</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482616</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:51:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Red Times</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I wish the times was more metronatural.</p>]]></description>
<author>The Red Times</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482624</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482624</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:01:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DOUG.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Sonics will take The Times to Oklahoma City.</p>]]></description>
<author>DOUG.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482634</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482634</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:10:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Catalina Vel-DuRay</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For a town that was founded on the availability of hookers, and was sustained for decades by the taxes paid by "seamstresses", and eventually beat out the corporately-prefered Tacoma as the "Queen City" because of our prostitutes, I find this pretty damn embarrassing.</p>

<p>Let the boys see some titties up close and personal. Let them have a lap dance if they want. And let them have a drink while doing it. </p>

<p>Lou Graham and John Pinnell are spining in their graves. </p>]]></description>
<author>Catalina Vel-DuRay</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482644</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482644</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:25:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sean</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The staff at the Times is clearly in need of an extra long, extra close lap dance. Perhaps The Stranger and club owners could spring for a few dancers to pay them a visit.</p>]]></description>
<author>Sean</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482647</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482647</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lark Hawk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap, I want that cop's job! Man, I've heard of some great careers - video game tester, those guys who made robots and then battled them on TV, beer taster - but getting paid by the city to enjoy $10,000 worth of lap dances? Nothing comes close.</p>]]></description>
<author>Lark Hawk</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482648</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482648</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:31:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Micky</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of lap dances, anyone here ever been to The Sands in Ballard? Is that place any good?</p>]]></description>
<author>Micky</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482649</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482649</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Grant Cogswell</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Did the cop beat off or have sex before each time he got lap-dances so as not to Â´reactÂ´ to the dances? Would a Â´reactionÂ´ be a kind of entrapment of the dancer? Was he paid for the time he had sex/beat off prior to the visits or was that on personal time? Maybe the cop was a woman in disguise or wore special equipment to conceal possible engorgement.<br />
 <br />
These are the kind of ridiculous and inappropriate questions that are begged by the government butting in where they have no fucking business. Electeds of Seattle: Do something for poor kids or address global warming or something, ya morons.</p>]]></description>
<author>Grant Cogswell</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482982</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482982</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by catalina vel-duray</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, a good amount of the blame for this is to be laid at the feet of Seattle's Neo-Liberals.</p>

<p>I remember listening to a show on KUOW a few years back when Strippergate happened. They interviewed one of the reporters from the Stranger (maybe Eli?) who was taking a somewhat moderate, normal person's stand, when a shrieking harpie called in and went on a tangent about the strip clubs, and how can't she drive her daughter past one (the implied message being that a girl sees a strip club, a girl becomes a stripper) and ended the call with her shrieking that the reporter and the KUOW person should be ashamed of themselves. </p>

<p>Crap. Pure crap. She's probably one of those people who would bore you to death with storied about her trip to Amsterdam. </p>]]></description>
<author>catalina vel-duray</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482993</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c482993</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:29:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Arturo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Neo-liberals? Damn those free markets!</p>]]></description>
<author>Arturo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c483054</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c483054</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by rodrigo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Times should worry less about the difference between lap dancing and prostitution, and more about the difference between journalism and prostitution.</p>]]></description>
<author>rodrigo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c483061</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/seattle_times_no_bon#c483061</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>