Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Greg Nickels Cares What People... | Farewell, Crappy Slogan »

Monday, October 16, 2006

Bodies: the Exploitation?

posted by on October 16 at 13:14 PM

The directors of the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries (“a paranormal science museum with exhibits, library, and cultural center exploring legends, lore, UFO history, bigfoot, ghosts… “) have been complaining, in long email missives, about Bodies: the Exhibition, presented by Premier Exhibitions.

That the cadavers haven’t consented. That their origins—in a big Chinese hospital—are suspect. That the glass cases they are in might leak and cause health problems. Et cetera. (And yes, it is a little bit funny that MotM, which hosts ghost tours, is getting exercised about Premier’s “exploitation of the dead,” but there is a difference.)

Now they’ve up and done something about it by filing a federal complain against Premier. The long email missive describing the move follows the jump. An excerpt:

A Minute Order issued by [U.S. District Court] Judge John C. Coughenour did not approve a request for an emergency injunction to stop the exhibit is the movant did not demonstrated “immediate and irreparable harm” but the doctors were informed the complaint will be forwarded to a magistrate and is on permanent file with the courts.

It seems improbable to me that the bodies are murdered Falun Gong members—if I were running a totalitarian state that practiced political assassination, I would do anything with my victims before I would hand them over to doctors from other countries for examination and display. Nevertheless, cheers to the Museum of the Mysteries for keeping the pressure on. There’s no evidence that Premier obtained these bodies illegally or unethically—but then, they haven’t provided any evidence to the contrary.

Press Release
10/14/06
For Immediate Release
Federal Complaint regarding Seattle Cadaver Exhibit filed against Premier Exhibitions.

The Directors of the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries, Charlette LeFevre and Philip Lipson have filed a federal complaint Case No. 06-1490 in U.S. District Court Western District of Washington at Seattle on Oct. 13, 2006 against Premiere Exhibitions of Atlanta, Georgia regarding their exhibit of unconsenting cadavers. The complaint is based on the issue that the exhibitors do not have consent papers and the museum Directors feel the exhibitors are violating the U.S. Anatomical Gift Act which explicitly prohibits the sale of human tissue. The complaint cited a statement by Dr. Lynn Romrell Ph.D. Executive Director of the Anatomical Board of the State of Florida in which he states the board rejected the same exhibit last year based on no consent papers were obtained from the deceased and the city of San Francisco's ordinance prohibiting the display of human remains without authorization or consent after a similar type of exhibit was shown in San Francisco last year and enraged the Chinese community.

The Directors also stated they feel Premier Exhibitions is misleading the public by not stating in their advertisement the bodies are all unconsenting Chinese cadavers. The Directors believe visitors have the right to know the facts to decide for themselves as they believe the public would think twice about purchasing a ticket in which they would be viewing unconsenting bodies and furthering this type of trade of human body parts. Premier Exhibitions is a for profit company and is not a medical or educational institution.

The Directors assert that no U.S. physician has endorsed this exhibit. Dr. Roy Glover who is listed as ³Chief Medical Advisor² for ³Bodies: The Exhibition² is a retired professor of Anatomy from the Univ. of Michigan and is not a physician.

The complaint requested an emergency injunction to close the exhibit ³until as such time as consent documents are produced for the cadavers as well as the identity of each cadaver for review by any medical institution and requesting parties and verified.² Also a stoppage of all advertisements showing cadavers and to initiate a full inquiry into the legality of this exhibit. A Minute Order issued by Judge John C. Coughenour did not approve a request for an emergency injunction to stop the exhibit as the movant did not demonstrate ³immediate and irreparable harm² but the directors were informed the complaint will be forwarded to a magistrate and is on permanent file with the courts. Charlette LeFevre states she did not file the complaint on her behalf but rather the 21 cadavers now on display . As the cadaver¹s identities are not known and requests for documents verifying their identities have been denied, it is impossible at this time to assess the harm and damage to themselves or their families. But given their country of origin - China and their customs of burying the body whole or they spiritually believe their souls will wander the earth it is reasonable to believe these Chinese cadavers would not have wanted to have been displayed to the public and this would be hugely offensive to the families of the deceased.

The Directors of the Museum believe a formal complaint will encourage other institutions and persons to responsibly review this exhibit and speak out on their position regarding the cadaver exhibit . The Directors encourage anyone who has already seen the show and if they were not informed of the lack of consent of the cadavers in the exhibit¹s advertisement and felt they were misled, to ask for a refund.

For more information contact:
Charlette LeFevre or Philip Lipson
Directors, Seattle Museum of the Mysteries
623 Broadway E Seattle, WA 98012
www.seattlechatclub.org

RSS icon Comments

1

I don't think it even matters if Premier can somehow prove that none of the bodies were of murdered political prisoners. Those individuals and their families didn't consent to the cadavers' use. That makes it exploitative.

Posted by keshmeshi | October 16, 2006 1:36 PM
2

The Health Department sent out an inspector to look at the claims that the bodies might be dangerous or leak.
The report stated that the claims are without merit.

Posted by whatever | October 16, 2006 1:51 PM
3

They came from China. They are almost certainly prisoners. Political prisoners or not, I can't say, but certainly prisoners.

Posted by Fnarf | October 16, 2006 2:40 PM
4

Eh. They're dead. I rather dislike our concept that bodies should be hermetically sealed in a box in the ground, separated from the universe until Judgement Day. Gimme a leaky pine box so I can rot properly and feed the worms, or barring that, preserve me and put me on display.

Posted by Gitai | October 16, 2006 2:42 PM
5

"There’s no evidence that Premier obtained these bodies illegally or unethically—but then, they haven’t provided any evidence to the contrary."

This is the U.S., where you are innocent until your accuser proves you are guilty. You are not guilty until you prove your own innocence, Brendan.

I think the lawsuit is the pinnacle of irony. A museum whose mission is to explore various mysteries and claims to be educational is suing to stop an exhibit that explores life's mysteries (the function and building blocks of the human machine) and most definitely is educational.

Posted by SB | October 16, 2006 3:55 PM
6

Premier must prove that the bodies *aren't* prisoners? Pretty difficult to prove a negative, especially a dead negative.

By the way, does anyone know what is done with the bodies of the executed in the US? Some are donated to science by consent. If not, where are they buried or cremated and who pays for that expense? It has to be the government, no? Does the government "own" the bodies of prisoners just like they owned the living prisoner? It brings up a some interesting legal paradoxes.

Posted by Orson | October 16, 2006 3:55 PM
7

These new plastinate anatomy exhibitions are amazing. The one on display in Boston was one of the more powerful experiences of myself as a mortal and material creature that I have had. But the huge demand for these exhibits seems to have had some perverse effects on the supply.

Compare this frank discussion in the FAQ page of Gunther von Hagens' BODY WORLDS 2:

The BODY WORLDS exhibitions rely on the generosity of body donors, individuals who bequeathed that upon their death, their bodies could be used for educational purposes in the exhibition. All of the full body plastinates and the majority of the specimens are from these body donors; some specific specimens including the fetal development display, and those that show unusual conditions come from old anatomical collections.

Gunther von Hagens doesn't list the names and ages of his subjects, but neither does he mince words about how they ended up on display. Humans have a long history of honoring the dead by treating their remains with some degree of reverence. Asking a person's permission to turn them into a curiosity show is the least you can do, especially since these groups are making a profit off of human remains. If Premier Exhibitions is running as clean a program as von Hagens, they should act like the educational institution they claim to be and educate the public about how a once-living person shows up on display as part of a commercial venture.

Posted by Jon | October 16, 2006 6:48 PM
8

"I think the lawsuit is the pinnacle of irony. A museum whose mission is to explore various mysteries and claims to be educational is suing to stop an exhibit that explores life's mysteries (the function and building blocks of the human machine) and most definitely is
educational."

The Seattle Museum of The Mysteries does explore mysteries and have ghost tours, but they do not have naked,skinned, bodies of unconsenting people. We are totally in favor of "exploring life's mysteries" but there is no reason or purpose to do it with naked Chinese unconsenting cadavers, except to attract people who enjoy the "gross-out" factor and pride themselves on getting sick to their stomach, and therefore having the exhibit rake in tons of money. Premier Exhibitions is not a museum, medical institution, or even an educational facility. Its major purpose is to make money for its stockholders.

Posted by Philip Lipson | October 17, 2006 12:36 AM
9

Von Hagen clean? Who do you think developed the processing plant in Dalian China where these cadavers are made?

"I can't prove the bodies weren't executed, but I believe they weren't" - Gunther von Hagens (real name Liebchen), BBC News Jan. 22, 2004

How convenient.

Posted by Speaking up for the dead | October 17, 2006 1:16 AM
10

"This is the U.S., where you are innocent until your accuser proves you are guilty. You are not guilty until you prove your own innocence, Brendan."
-SB

WOW. Are you one of those people who still believes in the US and The Federal Judiciary? wow.

but aside from that...
I think it's a complete exploitation. I also find it suspicious that in all this debate they've stayed undercover and havent hardly said a word about it all. hmm....

Posted by jjj | October 17, 2006 2:51 PM
11

Did Hitler ever go to trial?

I think Seattle is figuring out you can't side step the truth.
I also hope the cadavers haunt the exhibitors. We'll probably read about some ancient Chinese curse that comes to people who defile the bodies of the weak and poor.

Posted by Dancing Dead | October 17, 2006 11:42 PM
12

This exhibition is already banned from several states, countries and cities.

Posted by catnextdoor | October 18, 2006 7:44 AM
13

mortgage georgia

Posted by mortgage georgia | November 6, 2006 11:17 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).