Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Bitter on Yom Kippur

1

How 'bout a compromise? Mayor Gridlock can hold meetings on Yom Kippur, but cannot engage in Pork?

Posted by Napoleon XIV | October 2, 2006 9:37 AM
2

Keep in mind that Josh and Shohanna should both be in shul all day. This is a perfect time to indulge in some Israel criticism or to suggest that we may be losing the war in Iraq.

Posted by Gurldoggie | October 2, 2006 9:58 AM
3

Jews won't wear leather shoes or drive their cars today because god tells them to. Christians won't let teenagers take birth control.


All religion is for idiots.

Posted by Religion Sucks | October 2, 2006 10:14 AM
4

Help me keep track here...you are tying
A)...the holding of a meeting on a Jewish Holy Day....
B)...to the agency (SMP) that held it...
C)...to the Mayor...
D) ...who pulled support for it....
E) AFTER THEY BLEW THE PROJECT TO PIECES AND ALL HE DID WAS SAY THAT WE SHOULD VOTE ON THE CARCASS!!!

I am just a simple man from Lacey, but it sounds like a stretch.

Posted by StrangerDanger | October 2, 2006 10:23 AM
5

Josh I thought you were'nt even religious?!?


Religious holidays like Christmas make me sick. Yom Kippur is "holy" to Jews? Why aren't there stupid South Park episodes about this nonsense about not wearing leather shoes today? If we could make fun of Yom Kippur like we make fun of Easter maybe the Jews will get over themselves and religion.


America would be better if it was totally secular. Ridiculing Yom Kippur would be a good start. Lots of people work on Christmas, so Jews should be forced to work on Yom Kippur.

Posted by I hate christmas | October 2, 2006 10:30 AM
6

What's up with all the idiots commenting today? Was it the sports posting over the weekend?

Posted by ahura | October 2, 2006 11:17 AM
7

Generally, I comment every day.

Posted by Napoleon XIV | October 2, 2006 11:47 AM
8

Every day is a high holy day for me.

Why aren't any public meetings held in the open at parks? From my religious beliefs, this is essential.

So, we can see - one rule for one group, but no acknowledgement of others.

Posted by Will in Seattle | October 2, 2006 11:51 AM
9

This wouldn't happen in New York.

10

Get over it. The monorail was never going to work as you single-track minded proponents imagined it. We can't even keep our mile-long one running. The only rational that makes any sense for the Monorail in Seattle is the mindset of Seattle exceptionalism. Sure, it's not really worked anywhere else on the planet, except maybe Japan (and boy is that debateable), but we're so special and different than anywhere else on the planet, it must work for us, because, well--we're so special. The Monorail concept was broken from its inception, its costs ballooned out of control even more than Sound Transit's did, and its funding formulal was based on faulty--on might even say "sexed up" assumptions. It would have made Bush's war in Iraq seem well thought out. Let's MOVE ON and find better non-auto based transportation alternatives.

Posted by Sail | October 2, 2006 5:14 PM
11

Call me stuck in the past, Sail, but your argument stikes me as totally wrongheaded. I won't defend the management at SMP, but if we can afford a waterfront tunnel, we could have afforded to kick in a few hundred mil to put a larger downpayment on a capital investment adding functionality instead of moving traffic underground for a mile.

Seattle Monorail:


Voters Told: 1.75 billion (Ballard - WS)


Actual: 2.1 billion (Ballard - WS)


Overrun: 350 million,


Sound Transit Central Link:



Voters Told: 1.67 billion (UW-Seatac)


Actual: 2.3 (Westlake - Seatac)


PLUS $1.7 to get to the UW (Projected)


Overrun: 2.3 billion,


Iraq War:



Voters Told: Oil = Pays for itself


Actual: 330 billion +


Overrun: Infinite.

Posted by Some Jerk | October 2, 2006 6:04 PM
12

Sail,
What works best in Seattle is dithering & delay.

Posted by David Sucher | October 3, 2006 8:12 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).