<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on As Promised...</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised</link>
<description>... a very smart discussion of the NJ gay marriage decision from Dale Carpenter. Some money quotes: New Jersey does not follow what the court calls the &quot;rigid” three-tiered scrutiny of the federal equal protection cases: &quot;strict scrutiny” for race classifications, &quot;intermediate” scrutiny for sex/gender classifications, and &quot;rational basis” for almost every other kind of classification. [ . . . ] Instead, the state courts have adopted a &quot;flexible” test that calls for distinctions between &quot;similarly situated people” to be justified by &quot;a substantial relationship to a legitimate governmental purpose.” [ . . . ] This discussion of a gap...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:24:41 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:27:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by him</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Supreme Court shouldn't have even been addressing rational basis.  Justice Madsen's contorted logic  put gay couples in the "not discriminated against" camp (ie, Murray's gay civil rights bill + gay elected officials mean that gays arene't discriminated against. Hmm, I guess that means blacks aren't discriminated gainst now, eh?).  The Court should've used a higher standard.  But I don't think our Court could say "hey Legislature, do something within 180 days."  It's either constitutional or it's not.</p>]]></description>
<author>him</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised#c482274</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised#c482274</guid>
<category>Homo</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:16:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jack</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>mr carpender is a gay libertarian republican type - has been tryinfg to crash gay issues for years</p>

<p>funny you people are citing him as an expert - he hates gay progressive stuff with a passion, much more than he dislikes homophobia</p>]]></description>
<author>Jack</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised#c482285</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised#c482285</guid>
<category>Homo</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by annie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Carpenter on the record supporting gay marriage; he just prefers that it be instituted through the legislature. (An incremental approach was the most popular option in the gay community until about five years ago, if you'll recall.) He's probably libertarian, possibly Republican, perhaps gay—but he's also wicked smart.</p>]]></description>
<author>annie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised#c482453</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/10/as_promised#c482453</guid>
<category>Homo</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:27:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>