Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Here Come the Republicans | While I Was Gone »

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Pay Attention, People

Posted by on September 17 at 14:53 PM

For the last 3 weeks, since The Stranger Election Control Board made its picks for this Tuesday’s primary election, we’ve been running a handy Cheat Sheet for you.

Just as important as our picks (Gerry Alexander in Supreme Court Justice position No. 8 ; Yes on Initiative No. 88, the education funding levy; Stephanie Pure in the 43rd District state house race) is this: Follow the damn directions we printed at the top of the page under the “Party Preference” choice.

As we wrote: “Voters must designate a party preference to vote in that party’s primary. You cannot vote in a Republican contest if you select Democratic.

As The Seattle Times reported in an alarming article last week about Snohomish County:

A sampling of 250 ballots collected for Tuesday’s primary shows about 20 percent of voters did not select a party, invalidating the choices they made in partisan races.

Once again: In our new “Pick-a-Party Primary” voters must select Republican or Democratic before voting in partisan races. And you can only vote in the partisan races that correspond to your party choice. For example, if you check Republican, you cannot vote in the 6-way 43rd District Democratic primary. You can only vote in the Republican primary. If you don’t check either Democratic or Republian—your vote in partisan races will not be counted. Similary, if you pick one party, but vote in both party’s primaries—or in the opposite party’s primary—your votes in partisan races will not count. If you fail to pick a party, your vote will be counted only in nonpartisan races and for ballot measures, like initiatives and the Supreme Court races.

Got it? Good. Now vote, vote, vote! And remeber: Pure, Alexander, Susan Owens, and Yes on I-88.


CommentsRSS icon

Dammit ... why'd you have to go and alert all the Republicans to this?

The number of Republicans who read the Slog is pretty small. Stoners, however, are another matter. I assume that right after this post there were hundreds of absent-minded Slog readers working feverishly at the mail slot with a coathanger trying to retrieve their incorrectly-marked ballots from the mailbox.

On the other hand, many Republicans are very old, and with poor vision, so it's entirely likely just as many of the rejected ballots will belong to them as to "stoner" lefties, and things will end up pretty much as a wash.

However, after the elections (and the inevtitable round of lawsuits from losing candidates) are over, it would be very interesting for the State Elections Office to do a count of those rejected ballots, just to see which side was paying less attention.

I am a lowly comment from a lowly commenter. Josh will soon exercise his editorial power and delete me for reasons only known to him. If the original post were written by anyone else at The Stranger, I would be allowed a long and happy life. But alas, this post is written by Josh, so I will be mercilessly erased from history, as if I never existed.

hasn't happened yet, never existed. i had the pleasure of enjoying you a half hour into your maybe-soon-to-be-terminated life.

So, too, shall you be deleted, Wags, if only because you witnessed my short life. See you in the comment afterworld.

Those are good recommendations, but I always take them with a grain of salt after you told Stranger readers to vote no on 901.
You did so because your pockets are lined with tobacco money - you're guilty of the same kind of corporate corruption you love to criticize in your newspaper.
You can read more about it in the new comic "The Adventures of Strangie" at http://tobaccoadprotest.tripod.com

Your "comic" is fucking hideous, and so is the criminally misleading popup ad it presented to me (this is a new computer, and I haven't got my adblockers installed yet). So who's unethical now?

You left out the Chambers Burrage race for Supreme Court that will be decided in the primary. This one is important. In the past, the voters have frequently voted in women justices. An early poll showed Burrage behind but with a majority of women supporting her. However, if they knew anything about her they would certainly vote for Chambers. Burrage is an unqualified, right-wing gasbag who would line up with Steve Johnson and John Groen.

Vote Chambers or you are f'ing crazy!

Burrage might well be the worst judicial candidate for any judgeship in the history of the world. Remember, this is the lady who told a female attorney that she couldn't argue a case in front of her because she was wearing pants; women in her courtroom were required to wear skirts or dresses. No, this was not in 1963.

Why is the public paying for a primary in which the Dems & GOP are selected to run in November. Mr. Reed, our Secretary of State, for the next legislative session, should submit a bill that would have the Democrats, GOP, and any other party who wants the state to hold a primary to select their candidates pay for the primary.

By the way, if the Top-2 primary is unconstitutional, then could someone please explain how Louisana is still getting away with running that system.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).