News Live from DC: Cantwell Votes Nay on Military Detainees Bill, Inslee Busts Nickels, and I Visit My Hero’s Office
posted by September 28 at 16:51 PM
onI’m on Capitol Hill, the one in Washington, D.C., which isn’t such a great neighborhood for wi-fi—and so, I haven’t been able to Slog much. Which is a drag because there’s a lot to report. (I’m here on assignment for the paper, writing about Sen. Maria Cantwell. You’d think the office of our high tech Senator would have wi-fi, but no such luck.) And I certainly thought the Senate press gallery—where I’ve been hunkered down for the past few days with an awesome temporary press pass—would come equipped with wi-fi. But again, no such luck. (I guess The Stranger has to pay for a connection.)
Although, bonus: the cool press pass lets me walk around like a big shot and go anywhere I want—including on the legendary private subway that connects the Capitol to the Senate offices. It looks very 1960s…as in, 2001 the movie.
Anyway, I was here for today’s ugly, historic vote: 51-48 against an amendment to Bush’s Military Tribunals bill. The smart amendment (proposed by Arlen Specter) would have restored the fundamental right of habeas corpus… a fancy term that means people have the right to challenge their arrest and detainment. Cantwell voted for the amendment.
Fortuitously, last week, I scheduled a sit-down interview with Cantwell for today, and so, I got to talk with her at length just minutes after her vote. “We have to stand up for the rule of law,” she said. “That’s what’s important in the United States. The fact that people could be detained and not have access to counsel to know why they were detained? I’ve been to Guantanamo Bay and saw the circumstances there. Certainly there are people who have been there for several years without being charged. Now to offer these rewards for people turning in other individuals…you can imagine, you know, ‘Oh, my neighbor is a terrorist’ and the next thing you know, you’re in Guantanemo Bay. You need to have a process and habeas corpus to say, ‘Hey, why am I being detained?’”
Given her strong objections to the bill (and her nightmares about a dystopian future), I asked Cantwell how she would vote on the bill itself later in the day. She wouldn’t say, which made me a little nervous. (Remember the whole filibuster on the Patriot act, but then her vote for the Patriot Act?) But late in the day—after she voted for three other failed amendments (one that would have required quarterly reports from the CIA on detainee interrogations; one that mandated a five year sunset for the law; and one that would have specifically forbidden the US from using torture methods that are outlawed by the Geneva Conventions (the bill leaves that up to Bush’s interpretation)—Cantwell voted nay.
The bill passed 65-34. …which heightens the cool factor of Cantwell’s dissent. The losing amendments had netted votes in the high forties…meaning they pretty much split along party lines. But in the final passage, a lot of Democrats were obvioulsy peeled off. Not Cantwell.
I’ll have a lot more to report on Cantwell in next week’s Stranger, but I do want to report on two unrelated things from my visit to Capitol Hill. One is this: Late in the day on Wednesday, I was sitting on the steps of one of the House office buildings, and who should walk by but the coolest member of Washington’s house delegation, Rep. Jay Inslee (D-1). I flagged him down, and he told me about his plans for next session, when, in his not so humble opinion, it’s a foregone conclusion that the Democrats are going to take over.
He also bitched me (the media) out for not reporting that the majority of his Democratic colleagues in the House, including him, voted against the war four years ago. “Everyone thinks the Democrats rolled over on that,” he said. “And that’s just not true. We voted against it.” Anyway, he ended up talking about his Apollo Initiative—a green bill to promote alternative energy, tighten environmental standards and reduce green house gas emissions. This gave me an opening to do a little lobbying while I was on Capitol Hill. I asked him what he thought about Mayor Greg Nickels’s tunnel option—you know, the freeway thru downtown that will cost $5 billion plus now to accommodate our addiction to cars. And to my surprise, Inslee had heard all about the People’s Waterfront Coalition streets and transit option. (He didn’t outright endorse it…) but he sure seemed interested in it. He chastised Nickels for “missing an opportunity” to make a major break with our old way of thinking and said Nickels needed to think more seriously about the surface option—especially since, Inslee surmised, the mayor would be coming to people like Inslee for federal money.
The other thing I want to report about is this! … my visit to Rep. John Lewis’s office. Lewis is the Rep. from Altanta. He’s also my hero. Lewis was the 23-year-old star of the Civil Rights movement in the early ’60s. On Wednesday afternoon, I went over to his office.
“Can I help you?” the woman behind the desk asked.
“Yes. I’m a reporter in town from Seattle working on a story about the Senator from Washington state, but I wanted to stop in here and see…well, you probably get this about once every few months or so, but you know, you guys work for a living legend… and, well, he’s my hero anyway, and….”
The woman broke into a beautiful, friendly smile. “Unfortunately, the Representative is out of town this week…”
I’m sure I looked crestfallen because she got up from her desk and said… “Come on, follow me.” Next thing I know, I’m in Lewis’s office and she’s showing me all this amazing memorobilia. Basically, Lewis has a civil rights era musuem in his office—including rare and stunning photos from the early ’60s of Lewis and other civil rights kids making history.
I was in a grand mood.
Alas. Civil rights, shmivel rights. The next day, I hung out in the Senate and watched them shelve habeas corpus.
Comments
Great post Josh. Too many people are afraid to display their hero worship. And you picked a great hero.
Oh. My. God.
WE ARE ALREADY BUILDING DETENTION CAMPS:
02-09-2006
Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps
By Peter Dale Scott
A Halliburton subsidiary has just received a $385 million contract from the Department of Homeland Security to provide "temporary detention and processing capabilities."
To date, some newspapers have worried that open-ended provisions in the contract could lead to cost overruns, such as have occurred with KBR in Iraq. A Homeland Security spokesperson has responded that this is a “contingency contract” and that conceivably no centers might be built. But almost no paper so far has discussed the possibility that detention centers could be used to detain American citizens if the Bush administration were to declare martial law.
Google it.
I don't mean to sound paranoid, but shouldn't we be looking into this whole detention center thing now that Congress has legalized torture and indefinite imprisonment?
Maybe we should start practicing our confessions...
Great. Super.
Now all I need is some right-wing whack job who hates fags to take a disliking to me, call homeland security, and accuse me of being a terrorist. I'm an immigrant, so I'll be packed off without trial, without the right to an attorney, or the right to question why I'm being detained. They can hold me... well, basically forever. My partner and my family might not even know where I've been taken: Gitmo, Syria, or some other unnamed country? I would have no right to question any of it, nor any redress. They can interrogate me and try to get me to confess to being a terrorist by waterboarding, sleep depravation, and hypothermia (none of which Bush considers to be torture). Even if 20 years from now, or 40 years from now, they decide it was all a terrible mistake, and release me, I won't be able to sue anyone, because everyone involved will be immune from prosecution. In that time, my elderly parents will probably have died, and my partner will have moved on (I might not even be able to find him), and I will have been financially ruined. Oops. So sorry. Too bad. All done to protect us in the war on terra'. Move along now.
Sound crazy? Paranoid even? Well, according to the bill the Senate passed today, every part of the above scenario will be completely legal. Welcome to Amerika, land of the formerly free.
god damn you spineless democrats. I don't give a shit if a bill is "destined" to pass. you just don't fucking "peel off" and pass this shit.
FUCK YOU ALL.
I don't know. I bet Halliburton will take the $385 million and run off with it.
Please don't ignore global warming! If you bring organic snacks on the airplane it will help. Also request a biodiesel fueled jetliner for you flight. It can prevent lots of global warming.
The Stranger staff flies around a lot and you have to make sure to eat organic and use only biodiesel. The republicans are trying to ruin the earth.
In case you thought Mc Gavick to be a moderate ---Cantwell voted against it.
McGavick said he would have supported it.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).