Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Re: More Buju Than You | Bufu Banton: My Two Cents »

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Cadavers on Parade

Posted by on September 26 at 16:09 PM

bodies1.jpg
This morning I previewed Bodies: The Exhibition, which opens Saturday in the former site of the temporary downtown library (800 Pike St).
Controversy surrounds the corpses’ identitiesthe bodies are Chinese people who died unidentified or unclaimed by family members, and then were purchased legally by Dalian Medical University’s Plastination Laboratories where they were prepared for display, according to Premier Exhibitions, who now owns the specimens. Some critics speculate that the “unclaimed” could be executed prisoners whose families were not informed of their demise; some bemoan the fact that the display company does not have the consent of the deceased to publicly display their bodies. Protesters have met the exhibit in other cities and I’m sure Seattle will have its share. A similar show in San Francisco, called The Universe Within, heard similar criticisms and then had to be closed when the corpses started to leak. NPR’s All Things Considered took a close look at Bodies and other cadaver exhibits in August.
I was delighted and awed by the bodies on exhibit here and I am planning to go again. I’ve posted some detailed photos after the jump. First, though, ask yourself: If I were invited to observe the autopsy of a stranger, would I go? If the answer is no, you might want to stop reading here, and you should probably skip Bodies.

bodies-eyebrows.jpgOn some corpses where the skin has been removed, the eyebrows, nose, and lips are intact, which has the effect of re-humanizing the faces.

bodies4.jpgThis is an entire central and peripheral nervous system, with eyes and optic nerves attached. The tone of the caption card is proud: "This remarkable dissection...”

bodies6.jpgBlood vessels of the body in isolation make breathatkingly beautiful displaysI'd put one in my living room if they were for sale. (There will be a retail shop attached to the exhibit though it hasn't been installed yet.)

bodies7.jpgI had to repeatedly remind myself that the displays aren't wax models.

bodies-skin.jpgAn entire human hide lies in a heap (our skin alone weighs 11 lbs. on average).

bodies-lady.jpgWe are mostly water, meat, and bone.

Other things you will see:
Eighth-inch thick cross-sections of an entire corpse allowing a transverse view, much like a slice of a tree trunk allows you to count its growth rings.
A room of fetuses in various stages of development, and several with congenital defects (a placard outside warns you to skip this room if you you'd rather not see dead babies).
Lungs damaged by nicotine (plus an appeal for you to quit smoking on the spot, and a handy clear (and thus far empty) discard box for discarded cigarettes packs).

The show is pricey ($24.50 for adults, $16 for kids 4-12, plus a $3 service charge), but if you're at all fascinated by what you're made of, you won't regret spending the cash.

Dan Savage told me he'd never take his kid, though he heard Seattle schools are planning tours. If I were still an elementary-aged wannabe scientist, I'd be fascinated and positively affected by this display of bald truths and adamant facts.

Thanks to Kelly O for the photos!


CommentsRSS icon

Didn't this cadaver thing come out like a year ago? It's already been covered by every major newspaper.


It's stale old news. Why did you even go see it? Shouldn't you have flown to New York to see the show when it first opened?

The Bodies exhibit is a rip-off of the original Body Worlds, created by a German (?) scientist who invented plastination (the process for preserving bodies). BodyWorlds is in Vancouver right now and it seems pretty amazing that Seattle couldn't land the real thing. People donate their bodies to BodyWorlds much like they would to a local university. It's much more legit, though Bodies certainly seems to be getting some hype. I hope the Stranger will inform its readers to head North! (http://www.bodyworlds.com/en/prelude.html)

I don't care if the Seattle version is a rip off of the original. We get touring versions of B'way show here (I just saw Wicked) and they are fine.


All I want to know is what art or exhibits are currently fashionable locally. Thanks for the heads up on the cadaver show in the temporary library space. I'm bringing friends to see it.

Ah, Kimberly - will you always be the perky slave-to-fashion of today? Or will you someday develop your out autonomous sense of aesthetics?

Please keep us posted as to your progress (or lack thereof). I'm sure Slog readers will continue to be enthralled by your ongoing quest to seek out and discover all that is fashionable in Our Fair City.

"If I were invited to observe the autopsy of The Stranger, would I go?"

Sure I would!

I'd go see the autopsy of the Seattle Weekly too, but I'd bring along a barf bag.

Touring versions of Broadway shows are also true to the original Broadway version, my pretty ... so not a very good comparison to point out!

i love the bodies but why are all the eyebrows reattached to all the cadavers? that is the only unrealistic part of the show.

I think the eyebrows are added back to make them look more like us and less like meat. I'll ask the people in charge and get back to you.

Kimberly,
Mr. First Nighter declares his ignorance as loudly as he can. Don't be misled that he's some kind of representative voice. Despite his foolish refusal to actually pay attention to the world around him, there are some amazing exhibits in town right now.

First and foremost, don't miss the guerilla-installed salt sculptures that are rapidly deteriorating in Occidental Square.

Next, you have to see the Henry Darger exhibit at the Frye museum. It's not only excellent, it's FREE.

There is a new exhibit of contemporary photography at the Henry Gallery, including some Cindy Sherman pieces that I had never seen before.

There is also some great stuff being shown at the local galleries. The Grover Thurston gallery has a really special exhibit of carved wooden figures by Joe Brubaker and a charming series of paintings by local artist Joe Max Emminger.

I haven't been to the Garde Rail gallery in a few months, but that's always a good bet too. They are Seattle's only gallery to see drawings by Gregory Blackstock, who is a compelling Seattle figure.

Some snobs like Mr. FN will begrudge you your curiosity, but pay them no mind. This town is having a great moment of re-discovering our local talent. Take it all in while you can!

Thanks gurldoggie. I pick up The Stranger to find out what restaurants are hot and which ones to avoid. What's so bad about that? Everyone at work says The Stranger is the last word about what is cool in Seattle. The Stranger Staffers writing about restaurants, theatre, and music must know something more about it that the average person or else how would they have a job?.


Some people don't like The Stranger but I love it and I think only cool people read it.

It's totally immoral and disgusting to take these bodies without permission. Body Worlds is legit, people donate- even pay to have this done to them. Not here, and it's terrible.

And the high price? Revolting. If these scientists can be assholes and take bodies to do what they please without permission, people should be able to go see the show for free without permission.

Fuckers.

So if they steal these bodies from Chinese prisons is it still OK to see this show? This is a cheaper copy of the German show. I don't really care if the bodies came from Chinese prisons I just want to know if this is a cool event to go see?

"It's totally immoral and disgusting to take these bodies without permission. Body Worlds is legit, people donate- even pay to have this done to them. Not here, and it's terrible.

Other than legalities, why does it matter if the exhibit had permission? I don't understand that logic. The bodies would look the same either way.

In any case what solid evidence do you have that Body Worlds is "ligit' other than their press release?

I saw the Bodies exhibit when I was in NY, and am planning on going to see the one in Seatlte as well. IT was probably the closet 'museum' exhibit I have ever scene. The opportunity to look inside a human body is an awe inspiring opportunity. The exhibit is well done and gives you the opportunity to see just about everything. At the NY exhibit they had bodies suffering from disease as well, including cancer and other tumors.

As for an autopsy. I would in a heart beat. I have also seen bodies being cremated and that was an interesting experience as well.

*Other than legalities, why does it matter if the exhibit had permission? I don't understand that logic. The bodies would look the same either way.

In any case what solid evidence do you have that Body Worlds is "ligit' other than their press release?

Its a matter of morals and ethics. If you dont care what happens to you or your loved ones bodies after death- or maybe you're dead inside already... be my guest, knock yourself out. But being giving the right to CHOOSE is the issue. Why is that so hard to understand?

Some sites relating to body donation:
http://www.bodyworlds.com/en/bodydonation/body_donation_program.html
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/80d0499808afa010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html

A side note: These bodies come from China- it's no secret that their culture holds death, tradition and morals at a very high standard. (dont ask me, just google it) I highly doubt they as a culture would consent to this. The US would be all over the place freaking out had it happened here (it probably already has, but it's not public yet) and I bet the people supporting this show would feel it to be immoral if it was americans that had not chosen to dontate their bodies. (read: ill treatment of prisoners of war is bad- ill treatment of prisoners dead bodies OK? puh-lease...)

"Its a matter of morals and ethics. If you dont care what happens to you or your loved ones bodies after death- or maybe you're dead inside already... be my guest, knock yourself out. But being giving the right to CHOOSE is the issue. Why is that so hard to understand?

You didn't answer the question, acturally, just babbled on about "morals and ethics" as if that answers everything - then comes the name calling, a dumb attempt at further obfuscation of your weak position.

You speak of caring about the bodies of loved ones in an abstract way that makes me think you've never actually had to deal with that life situation. I have. My personal experience was that the physical body is the least important part of the death and grieving experience. Certainly I want the remains treated with respect but that's a pretty general instruction. I felt just about the same level of concern as I did for the body of a beloved pet.

Anyway what's so respectful about incinerating a body or tossing it into a box in the ground after pickling with formaldehyde?

On China, my impression is that as a government they don't hold the lives of their people in very high esteem - but then, I would have to say the same thing about our own government after the past six years.


If the bodies comr from Chinese political prisioners is it immoral to pay money to see them? Other cities have written bad reviews of this exhibit, and if Seattle people don't know or don't care that the bodies come from executed Chinese political prisioners, then it might be OK to go see the bodies here. (My co-worker from New York said this exhibit was panned there)

Kimberly/Kimblery:
Are you for real? If you don't actually care about the ethics of the exhibits, why would you care about whether other people care about them? It would seem to me that it's ok to see the exhibit wherever it goes if you a.) want to see it and b.) don't care about the moral implications, but from your tone I wonder if you're not just yanking chains up in here.

In other cities there were protests because the bodies came from Chinese political prisioners who were executed. Some people felt is was macabre and immoral to pay money to view the preserved bodies of Chinese political prisioners. (Imagine the U.S. mounting an exhibit of the bodies of executed Guantanamo Bay prisioners!)


I could care less about politics, I just like to know what's the latest cool art exhibit everyone's talking about. My New York friends told me it was not cool to pay money to this particular exhibit (the original German exhibit was where the smart money went).

But in Seattle no one knows the bodies are really executed Chinese political prisioners. So in Seattle this exhibit is the "in" thing to see. I want to check it out.

P.S. It'd be interesting to know if any of the bodies in the exhibit are Chinese bloggers who wrote bad things about the Chinese government?

Hello Ursula, what truck did you just fall off of? Kimberly/Kimblery is merely an ugly little troll. Please don't feed her.

Amy Kate,

I clearly fell off the sarcasm short bus, because I sure as heck hadn't guessed that Kimberly was anything other than a young woman sincerely looking for advice on the cool, fashionable thing to do in Seattle. Thanks for taking me under your wing.

*You didn't answer the question, acturally, just babbled on about "morals and ethics" as if that answers everything - then comes the name calling, a dumb attempt at further obfuscation of your weak position.

Name calling? Wait, when did I call anyone a name? I think I just read you call me "dumb"....hmm...

*You speak of caring about the bodies of loved ones in an abstract way that makes me think you've never actually had to deal with that life situation. I have. My personal experience was that the physical body is the least important part of the death and grieving experience. Certainly I want the remains treated with respect but that's a pretty general instruction. I felt just about the same level of concern as I did for the body of a beloved pet.

I cant control the way you think yet- dont underestimate people, either. I understand what you're saying about the phsyical body- I've been known to refer to it as a "shell" before (something we use, abuse and loose). That's totally cool. What you're not hearing is: it's not a matter of WHAT we do to our bodies after death it's a matter of what we CHOOSE to do. It's totally our right as human being to choose if we ant to donate our bodies to science or get buried, cremated, fed to wolves- what have you. But to be "bought" after death and be on display without choosing to do so is totally wrong. It just is- sorry.

It should be stated too: I fully plan on donating my body to science after my passing. I'm not against it at all. Cut me open, scramble my insides- really, it's AOK. The difference between me and the chinese prisoners displayed at Bodies is simple- I chose to, they did not. You mention "respect" and respect is by definition: deference to a right, privilege. They didnt have the "right" or even the privilege to decide.

If you're fiending for more discussion and info on the Body Worlds stuff, there's some good info here.


First of all, it would have been nice if the stranger provided a working link or even the name of the facility hosting this event :(

"A side note: These bodies come from China- it's no secret that their culture holds death, tradition and morals at a very high standard. (dont ask me, just google it) I highly doubt they as a culture would consent to this."

Maybe you haven't noticed that it isn't Chinese culture that runs the country but the gov't repsonsible for things like Tianamen Square?

That said, nonetheless at this point, the bodies are here, and they are preserved, and it's not like going to see them is going to spawn some greater industry of China exporting corpses for this purpose. How many shows like this can the world support?

Since our "World Class City" isn't world class enough to get the legit and bigger and better version of this exhibit, we will just have to make do with this.

The only thing keeping me from seeing it may be the nearly $30 price tag...

The main point of the exhibit is to make a lot of money for the stock holders of Premier Exhibitions.There are health concerns, a similar exhibit in SF had oozing body fluids, there is a lack of informed consent. It is not being sponsored by a medical institution, or even a museum. It may be cool, but it is has little "educational" or "artistic" significance. Check out the article in September 28th Seattle PI

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/lifestyle/286689_bodies28.html

Also this link

http://dignityinboston.googlepages.com/seattle

"It may be cool, but it is has little "educational" or "artistic" significance.
(!)

I'm sure you didn't see the exhibit or you woulldn't say it has no "educational significance". It is mind bending. I suspect that most visitors are humbled by the magnificent complexity of the human body as revealed in these studies.

Just about everything we see in life is educational. The "education" in this and similar exhibits comes at the cost of human dignity. There are other ways to educate people. These exhibits are about entertainment, not science, and not education. In honor of the souls they once gave home to the bodies should be treated with respect. Slicing and dicing bodies for the amusement of the public and to make money is a lousy idea. Sure, it's fascinating, but so are a lot of things. That does not it make it right.

Let me clear things up for you all a bit....

"Bodies.. The Exhibition" to which you are mostly referring to(showing in Seattle) is in no way affiliated with the "Body Worlds" exhibition that is showing in Vancouver, by the originator of the plastination technique, Gunther von Hagens. Basically, we got the cheap knock-off. It is one of many. There are some who even botch it up enough to create bodies that leak during exhibitions. Sad to say the very least.

Now, what does that mean in terms of body aquisition and the Seattle show? Let me break it down for you.

"Bodies... The Exhibition" has leased the bodies it is displaying from the Dalian Medical University in China. The director of the plastination lab there, Dr. Sui Hongjin, was, long ago, a former associate of Von Hages, the originator of plastination. This University did, in fact (and as stated by the representatives of this show) aquire this bodies by legal(Chinese law)means from the Chinese government.(meaning they bought them). ALL of the said bodies were unclaimed or unidentified. Chinese law states that deceased indeviduals may be used for study(U.S. law is similar. The differences lie in the fact that China allows this for their prisoners, political or otherwise,... most of which remain unclaimed or unidentified). The creators of the show claimed to have researched the bodies' orgins. The simple fact is... there is, was, and never has been(to us or to the originators of the show) no proof that they were prisoners. AND there is no proof that they were not. Their reassurance to themselves and to you lie in a supposed contract with the university, which does not extend to where the university recieved them- the Chinese government. The fact remains.. THEY ARE NOT DONATED BODIES... they have been bought by the afermore mentioned university without consent of either the original bodies' owners, or any family members. They became property of the Chinese government through Chinese law, and were sold by that government to the university, which in turn leased them to the "Bodies.. The Exhibiition" show. Without any other U.S. legal ban, it remains for the viewer here in Seattle to decide if they wish to go to see the display, and surmise where its contents were gathered.. if they even care. Even bought legally through Chinese Govermental Law, one has to be aware of the track record of the Chinese Government when it comes to prisoners.

NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH..

"Body Worlds" by Gunther von Hages. There is a specified and detailed Body Donation Program in conjunction with the Body Wordls exhibition. All specimens on display come from this program. There is a current registry of at least 6800 living and 400 now deceased body donors. There is a full program consisting of detailed information, history of donation, information on the Heidelburg Institute of Plastination(said Body Donation program), information on how to become a donor, what happens to the body, how plastinations are used, and a full paperwork fulfillment requirement. This includes a declaration of will. This declaration may be revoked at any time.
Furthermore, in instances where the program has gone to 'pick up' said bodies, if they or their origins are found to be questionable, they are NOT taken.

For more information specific to body donation for fully legitimate and trackable plastination, see
http://www.bodyworlds.com/en/bodydonation/body_donation_program.html

Writers note....
I have been to the original "Body Worlds" exhibition in its native country. It was absolutely fascinating and educational. However, even though I completely respect and admire von Hages work, I am in no way partial to his company. I would go to any exhibition with the same quality of enlightenment. As with anything, If it contains questionable material, I question it. I research it. What I found for "Bodies..The Exhibition" has certainly changed the chances of me going to it.

With "Body Worlds", I witnessed, with my own eyes, a partial registry of donor requests to begin the donation program. This book was absolutely full to the brim. I almost signed it right then and their, and partially regret that I did not. I intend to donate my body to science. Its just a body, and I have every right to do with it what I see fit. If I'm not burned or chopped up and fed to lions(and I don't care), I would rather some good come from my corporal remains. Education is my passion, so that seems best for me.

Research for yourself everything you claim to abhor. Research for yourself things that you get into a controversial debate about.
If it is important to you, look it up before you go running your mouths like you know what you're talking about.

"That said, nonetheless at this point, the bodies are here, and they are preserved, and it's not like going to see them is going to spawn some greater industry of China exporting corpses for this purpose. How many shows like this can the world support?"

Actually, it is a new industry. A more profitable use of cadavers than Soylent Green.

Beyond the question of the indivual consent, there is also the issue of what this does to the relationship between Western medicine and ethnic and religious communities. Local hospitals and the UW have put in a lot of effort into outreach to cultures that will find this to reaffirm their fear that Western medicine is beyond disrespectful to taking acts that interfere with the soul's afterlife: much as Medieaval authorities burned the bodies of Witches, Gays, and Heretics to ashes so that they could not participate in the Resurrection.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).