<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on What&apos;s Left? Dry Humping?</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi</link>
<description>Fundamentalists have long argued that many methods of contraception, including IUDs, the Pill, and emergency contraception (Plan B), cause abortion (embryonic death) by blocking the implantation of a conceived embryo in the uterus. By that standard, the Journal of Medical Ethics reports, the &quot;rhythm method&quot; is a veritable embryonic genocide. Now suppose that we were to learn that the success of the rhythm method is actually due, not to the fact that conception does not happen—sperm and ova are much more long lived than we previously thought—but rather because the viability of conceived ova outside the [heightened fertility] period is...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:17:40 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 04:16:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by seattl98104</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>it's called the crazy, and they've got it.</p>]]></description>
<author>seattl98104</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448875</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448875</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Biff</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What'll they think of next? A period = abortion?</p>

<p>After all, that unfertilized egg was a potential person.</p>

<p>I can see if now: woman buys tampon, protestors howl "baby killer!"</p>]]></description>
<author>Biff</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448884</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448884</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:27:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Straight curious</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Being gay, I'm pretty ignorant of straight sexual terminology. Will someone tell me what the â€˜rhythm methodâ€™ is, Iâ€™d goggle it but Iâ€™m at work right now</p>]]></description>
<author>Straight curious</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448886</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448886</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:31:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Soupytwist</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The "rhythm method" often refers to the practice of "natural contraception" which involves charting a woman's menstrual cycle, vaginal secretions, body temperature, etc. in order to know which days are her most- and least-likely-to-be fertile days.</p>

<p>Don't confuse it with "withdrawal" aka the "French rhythm method."</p>

<p>Both are very popular amongst the Europeans and some Asian cultures.</p>]]></description>
<author>Soupytwist</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448893</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448893</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:40:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"What's next", of course, is not trying to prevent pregnancy at all, but encouraging it. Every sex act should result in a pregnancy, and any sex act that is undertaken with pregnancy as its goal is a moral crime, as is, naturally, any sex act undertaken when pregnancy is not possible (the rhythm method, sex after menopause, sex DURING pregnancy, sex with a known-infertile person). If you think that's crazy and extreme, you're just not getting where these people are coming from.<br /><br />
"Anti-sex" isn't just a slogan, you know.<br /><br />
The saddest part is that it is all based on a total factual error by the Catholic Church heirarchy 150 years ago: that sperm is sufficient in itself to make a human; there are no "eggs", just places to keep the baby warm. Add in a large helping of Calvinist hatred of any kind of pleasure or happiness, and Bob's your uncle: sexual perversion as official policy.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448897</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448897</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:47:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ben</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>just to be clear, this is a philosophical argument in a journal of professional philosophy (eg, medical ethics). the author L Bovens (LSE Dept of Philosophy)  is not arguing that the rhythm method is murder, only that consistently would require certain pro-lifers to believe such given their anti-choice arguments. </p>

<p>perhaps this is clear to everybody but the tone of ECB's post and some of comments here made me wonder. </p>]]></description>
<author>ben</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448904</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448904</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:06:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by religion is for idiots</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Christians won't let women get abortions, and Jews believe god wants Rabbis to suck the blood of baby cocks. All religion is a farce.</p>

<p>
But even New York Public health can't stop religious idiots -
<a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/std/std-bris.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/std/std-bris.shtml</a></p>]]></description>
<author>religion is for idiots</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448913</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448913</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:17:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sara Weisman</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Just some terminology clarification:</p>

<p>It is unclear from the article what the author means by "the rhythm method."<br />
The traditional rhythm method is calendar-based and assumes a regular 28-day cycle with ovulation on day 14.  Because cycle lengths and the date of ovulation vary, the calendar method is very ineffective.</p>

<p>More commonly used now is the sympto-thermal method, which charts waking temperature, cervical mucus, and changes in the cervix to determine whether a woman is fertile on a given day.  This method is pretty effective.</p>

<p>For more information, see<br />
<a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/medicalinfo/birthcontrol/pub-fertility-chart.xml" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/medicalinfo/birthcontrol/pub-fertility-chart.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/medicalinfo/birthcontrol/pub-fertility-chart.xml</a></a></p>

<p>Of course, from the point of ethics, all these methods do the same thing: help a woman determine when she is fertile so she can avoid sex or have sex, depending on whether or not she desires children.  And that control over childbearing is what is so scary to the conservatives.</p>]]></description>
<author>Sara Weisman</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448953</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448953</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:16:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by him</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Heck, rhythm method?  You can't even let your seed fall to the ground, or the LORD will smite you.  Plus it can be hard to get out of the carpet.</p>]]></description>
<author>him</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448954</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448954</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Xtina</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Spot Bovens' mistake:<br /><br />
<i>Randy Alcorn calculates that "even an infinitesimally low portion (say one hundredth of one per cent) of 780 million pill cycles per year globally could represent tens of thousands of unborn children lost to this form of chemical abortion annually".<br /><br />
...<br /><br />
If all of Alcornâ€™s 780 million pill users were to switch to the rhythm method, then these converts would be causing, in his own words, the deaths not of tens of thousands, but of millions of unborn children.</i><br /><br />
780 million pill cycles does not translate to 780 million pill users, but rather to 65 million women taking 12 monthly pill cycles a year.</p>]]></description>
<author>Xtina</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448967</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448967</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:50:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cardinal Biggles</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>every sperm is sacred!!</p>

<p>masterbators and other perverts (ie anyone engaging in any sex that does not result in at least 1 child per act of sexual congress) will be punished by the inquisition!</p>]]></description>
<author>Cardinal Biggles</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448976</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448976</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Napoleon XIV</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Inquisition?  I didn't expect *that*. . .</p>]]></description>
<author>Napoleon XIV</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448979</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c448979</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:02:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Too late, Nappie! Noone expects it!</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449029</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449029</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:49:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Davida</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The other problem with the rhythm method is that if the embryos don't die, then they have a much higher chance of becoming deformed in some way, which can lead to a whole slew of genetic disorders. (Especially Spina Bifida or Down Syndrome.)</p>]]></description>
<author>Davida</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449101</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449101</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:27:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Arturo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of terminology errors here.</p>

<p>Conception is equal to implantation, not fertilization as it is being used here.</p>]]></description>
<author>Arturo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449120</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449120</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:54:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Horace</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think that's the point. Since what gets called 'abortifacients' -- the morning-after pill, intrauterine devices, etc -- don't prevent fertilization, just implantation.</p>

<p>So since the rhythm method prevents implantation of the fertilized ovum, it should be as opposed as stridently as the other methods.</p>

<p>I think this is probably a priorities issue, rather than hypocrisy. Because, after all, no one's suggesting the rhythm method as the only pious alternative to contraception; just abstinence. Sex that doesn't lead to procreation is sinful; sex outside of marriage is sinful. The rhythm method, since it attempts to thwart God's will, is no less sinful than anything else.</p>

<p>Which seems like a pretty weeny God, if he's blocked by something so tenuous as a sliver of latex.</p>]]></description>
<author>Horace</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449132</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449132</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:36:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gomez</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So they're inferring there's nothing wrong with Logic Genocide?  Because that's exactly what they've spent 2000 years committing.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gomez</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449147</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449147</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Spooger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What method is it where her face cream prevents implantation?</p>]]></description>
<author>Spooger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449156</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c449156</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:53:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by erosive-esophagitis</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>&lt;a href=http://erosive-esophagitis.net&gt;erosive esophagitis&lt;/a&gt; all about</p>]]></description>
<author>erosive-esophagitis</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c455231</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/08/whats_left_dry_humpi#c455231</guid>
<category>Sex</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 04:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>