Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Just When You Thought the Brok... | Worst Thai Barbecue Ever »

Wednesday, August 2, 2006

Frank Blethen’s Estate Tax Lobbying (And His New Gay Agenda)

Posted by on August 2 at 12:21 PM

A lot of people, myself included, have been wondering whether estate tax foe and Seattle Times publisher Frank Blethen is now putting pressure on Washington Sen. Maria Cantwell to vote in favor of the federal estate tax repeal (a measure that’s currently being pushed by Republicans in Congress).

With Cantwell in a potentially tight re-election race, any lobbying from Blethen could carry the implicit suggestion that the endorsement of this state’s largest newspaper is contingent on Cantwell voting for the estate tax repeal. Today David Postman took the ballsy step of ringing up the Times’ über-boss and putting the question directly to him:

He told me, “This is the whole issue, is Maria responsive to D.C. Democratic party bosses or is she responsive to the people of the state of Washington?”

Blethen said he and his lobbyist, Jill Mackie, have lobbied Cantwell as well as Patty Murray and the state’s House delegation. He also lobbies the congressional delegation from Maine, where the family owns newspapers.

Blethen said he knows that people in the newsroom are uncomfortable with his political activity on the estate tax. He said editor Mike Fancher has made it clear on many occasions and said former Managing Editor Alex MacLeod was “far less subtle. He just looked me in the eye and said, ‘You shouldn’t be doing this.’ And I’d say, ‘Your job is to make sure we don’t affect anything you do.’ “

Does it pose a conflict to lobby a senator who will soon be looking for an endorsement from the paper’s editorial board?

“No, it doesn’t. All of our endorsements are based on a whole range of public policy issues and their philosophies on them, as well as their past behaviors on them.”

Uh-huh.

And it gets even more interesting:

Blethen has a new angle on lobbying for repeal of the estate tax. He wants to enlist gays and lesbians in the campaign for repeal.

He said that especially with last weeks’ state Supreme Court decision upholding a gay marriage ban, same-sex couples should be concerned about what the estate tax hit would be. If they could marry, even under the current law, there would be a partial exemption on an inheritance. Now in Washington state there’s no chance of that.

“If you’re a couple and you’re trying to preserve assets for a surviving spouse and children you get a 100 percent hit.”

Blethen said the estate tax has not been a primary concern for gays and lesbians. But now that the gay marriage fight has ended, for now at least, he said there could be increased interest in the issue. Log Cabin Republicans, the organization of gay Republicans, supports repeal of the tax.


CommentsRSS icon

As RELIGION SUCKS can be expected to chime in on every thread with the same repetitive sentiment, I thought it would help to simply get it out of the way up front for every thread.

"Religion sucks. Religious people suck. Wipe your ass with the Torah and piss on Christ. Religion is a farce."

There you have it. Isn't he a witty and insightful 13-year-old? What a bright boy!

I call bullshit on the "whole range of public policy issues" statement. Re-read the joke of an endorsement that was Bush 2000.

But kudos to his creative spin in trying to enlist the gay community in the estate tax fight. Kind of reminds me of Bush trying to get African Americans to back Social Security privitization, pointing out that their community doesn't live as long as white Americans.

"Ignore the real issues... you're getting screwed!"

Blethen seems to believe that everyone owns a newspaper, and is worried about their children not having complete control of the newspaper after they die.

If his kids are as out of touch as he is with the real world, I can only hope he fails to bequeath control of the newspaper.

Nothing like having a one-time employee of said publisher weighing in with a story on "objectivity" huh Eli?

oh come on, even the Stranger endorsed Bush in 2000.

To those opposed to the repeal of the "Death" estate tax: Nothing is more heartbreaking than a family business or farm being sold to pay for taxes. It's not just newspapers and big corporations Christopher. So these formerly middle class farms and ranches end up getting sold to big conglomerates instead. How does that make you feel?

oh mapleleaf, get real. i've actually paid estate taxes, and if you have to pay much, you're either a. incompetent or b. stupid.

didn't say I had to pay much though.

now, let's get back to discussing why there's noone left at the Seattle Weekly who doesn't live in Arizona.

Another thing - the estate tax is double taxation on the same asset. If the dems want to start winning elections in Western red states, they should champion its repeal.

FUCK - just blew my cover. Better come up with a different handle... :-)

Here are some quick facts about the current WA estate tax, which, contrary to what right-wingers want you to believe, doesn't mean you have to sell your farm or small business:

* Family farms are completely exempt, if at least 50% of the value is actually being used for farming. The estate tax does not force small businesses and family farms to liquidate their assets or go into bankruptcy, despite what anti-tax zealots would like you to think.

* The revenue generated by the estate tax will all go to the Education Legacy Trust. It will fund: [a] Initiative 728, which voters overwhelmingly approved to help keep class sizes in our schools manageable; [b] 7,900 higher education enrollments; [c] financial aid for higher education (increasing the State Need Grant to 65% of the state median income from 55%); and [d] Other education needs (increased Learning Assistance Program – LAP spending).

* The revenue generated will come from only about 250 estates a year - and it's money that has not been taxed before. While most other states without the estate tax have an income tax or a capital gains tax, Washington State does not.

http://www.washingtondefense.org/

"Another thing - the estate tax is double taxation on the same asset. If the dems want to start winning elections in Western red states, they should champion its repeal."

Bruce? Not lifetime member Bruce?

Anyway, it's not double taxation - we have a SALES tax in WA, not an INCOME tax, so unless you spent it - in which case it can't be taxed cause you spent it and it can't be inherited - it's never been taxed.

Ever.

At least not by us.

Besides, if you don't have a good accountant and lawyer, how is that our fault? Average taxation of millionaires is 8 percent actual, far lower than actual taxation of middle class people.

I don't find it heartbreaking at all. Why should you get ownership of anything just because of who your parents are? Why shouldn't someone else get a shot at owning the business?

Back in school, years before GW BUSH, the Estate Tax was discussed as supporting the founding IDEA/CONCEPT behind the USofA and constitution. That idea was no kings, no aristocracy at all. That is the reason for the tax to exist... it is meant to be a FUCK YOU at the mega-rich... as a way to prevent, over the generations, from wealth and wealth's political power being concentrated, over the generations, in the hands of a few family (hence: an aristocracy from being formed).

If family farms are exempt, how does that make ALL small businesses exempt? Personally, I'd like to see the exemption raised a little more, especially for the federal estate tax. $1 million doesn't go as far as it used to.

Gay spouses also don't get social security benefits --hmmmmm...maybe we SHOULD vote to replace ss w/ private retirement accounts. I would not really, but I think our straight friends owe us on these issues that they benefit from while we are denied.

Phenics:

If that were the intention of the Framers, certainly they would have instituted the death tax themselves, which they did not.

Furthermore, if that were the (publicly acknowledged) intent of the death tax (I don't debate that it is its actual intent) then certainly its supporters should stand by their principals and call for the abolition of all inheritance period. Why should you get ownership of anything just because of who your parents are or who you married?

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).