Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The Countdown; or, Help Us, Yo... | If I Were a Betting Man... »

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

As We Wait for This Morning’s Big Decision…

Posted by on July 26 at 7:11 AM

Yesterday David Postman said this

But maybe it has taken so long for the court to rule that the issue of gay marriage is losing steam. A column up on the Governing magazine site says “Gay marriage may soon run out of steam as a political issue in the states.” Marriage is so last year. The big fight now is gay parenting.

Yes, the fight is increasingly about gay parents—as I wrote in the Stranger’s 2006 Queer Issue. But it is a debate that we’re in a much better position to win. Governing writes, “if the choice is seen as being between gay parents and no parents, gay rights advocates may gain the advantage,” and that’s an excellent point. But there’s also this: Gay and lesbian parents, unlike gay and lesbian married couples, already exist in huge numbers all over the country, not just in one blue state. Gay families are a fact on the ground, not a scary hypothetical that the American Taliban can demagogue about quite so easily—not when we’re showing up at White House Easter Egg Rolls and PTA meetings. Gay marriage can be presented as a terrifying “what if?”, but gay parents can not.

Same-sex couples are adopting or having children through artificial insemination or surrogacy every day; we may hear less about gay baby boom today than we did back in, oh, 1998, when I adopted, but it hasn’t slowed one bit. If anything it’s picked up pace. Every year for the last four years my family has trekked to Michigan for Gay Family Week in Saugatuck, and there are more same-sex couples there every year—this year I met tons of male couples who had just adopted infants.

Gay parents: We’re here, we’re queer, we’re just as exhausted as straight parents—and if you try and take our kids from us, we’ll kill ya.


CommentsRSS icon

Gay marriage can be presented as a terrifying “what if?”, but gay parents can not.

That's wrong. Gay marriage exists already just as surely as gay parents exist. The court is debating whether or not to recognize those families, not whether the state should "allow" them to exist. The state does not get to decide who is married and who is not: only who receives equal status in the eyes of the law.

Know-nothing middle America continues to think of gay parents as a terrifying "what if," even though they already exist. Just like they do with gay married couples who already exist.

I agree, parenting is, strategically speaking, a much better gay rights issue than marriage. Winning the parenting issue would also undermine the major argument behind DOMA and similar anti-marriage laws.

Knock the first domino down, and the rest will fall.

Gay parenting has existed for a long, long time. I was brought up by gay parents back in the early 60s. It was just that they could never admit it then - they had to be "roommates," because otherwise they risked losing their jobs, their homes, custody of me - even their lives.

We've made some progress, and that's what is so frightening to the backlashers. They don't want progress, they don't want change, they want that bridge to the 15th century. But two steps forward and one step back still carries us gradually forward.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).